Orzack S H, Parker E D, Gladstone J
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Genetics. 1991 Mar;127(3):583-99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.3.583.
Using genetic markers, we tracked the sex ratio behavior of individual females of the parasitic wasp, Nasonia vitripennis, in foundress groups of size 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16. Comparison of 12 isofemale strains extracted from a natural population reveals significant between-strain heterogeneity of sex ratios produced in all sizes of foundress group. Under simple assumptions about population structure, this heterogeneity results in heterogeneity of fitnesses. The strains differ in their conditional sex ratio behavior (the sex ratio response of a female to foundress groups of different sizes). Females of some strains produce more males as foundress group size increases (up to size eight). Females of another strain produce more males when not alone but do not respond differentially to group size otherwise. Females of two other strains show no conditional sex ratio behavior. Females of only two strains behave differently in foundress groups of size 8 and 16. Correlation and regression analyses indicate that the strains differ significantly in their fit to the predictions of an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) model of conditional sex ratio behavior. Such heterogeneity contradicts the notion that females of this species possess conditonal sex ratio behavior that is optimal in the ESS sense. The results imply that this ESS model is useful but not sufficient for understanding the causal basis of the evolution of this behavior in this species. This is the first report on the sex ratio behavior of individual females in multiple foundress groups in any species of parasitic wasp. Data of this type (and not foundress group or "patch" sex ratios) are essential for testing evolutionary models that predict the sex ratio behaviors of individuals. We suggest that a test for an ESS model include the answers to two important questions: 1) is the model quantitatively accurate? and 2) is there reasonable evidence to indicate that natural selection has caused individuals to manifest the ESS behavior?
我们利用遗传标记追踪了寄生蜂丽蝇蛹集金小蜂单个雌蜂在由1、2、4、8和16只雌蜂组成的建巢群体中的性别比行为。从一个自然种群中提取的12个单雌系的比较表明,在所有规模的建巢群体中产生的性别比存在显著的品系间异质性。在关于种群结构的简单假设下,这种异质性导致了适合度的异质性。这些品系在其条件性性别比行为(雌蜂对不同规模建巢群体的性别比反应)上存在差异。一些品系的雌蜂在建巢群体规模增加时(直至规模为八)会产生更多雄蜂。另一个品系的雌蜂在非单独存在时会产生更多雄蜂,但对群体规模没有差异反应。另外两个品系的雌蜂没有表现出条件性性别比行为。只有两个品系的雌蜂在规模为8和16的建巢群体中的行为不同。相关性和回归分析表明,这些品系在符合条件性性别比行为的进化稳定策略(ESS)模型预测方面存在显著差异。这种异质性与该物种的雌蜂具有在ESS意义上最优的条件性性别比行为这一观点相矛盾。结果表明,这个ESS模型对于理解该物种这种行为进化的因果基础是有用的,但并不充分。这是关于任何寄生蜂物种中多个建巢群体中单个雌蜂性别比行为的首次报告。这类数据(而非建巢群体或“斑块”性别比)对于检验预测个体性别比行为的进化模型至关重要。我们建议对ESS模型的检验应包括对两个重要问题的回答:1)该模型在数量上是否准确?2)是否有合理证据表明自然选择导致个体表现出ESS行为?