Gubhaju Bina, De Jong Gordon F
Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore,
Int Migr. 2009 Mar 1;47(1):31-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00496.x.
This research tests the thesis that the neoclassical micro-economic and the new household economic theoretical assumptions on migration decision-making rules are segmented by gender, marital status, and time frame of intention to migrate. Comparative tests of both theories within the same study design are relatively rare. Utilizing data from the Causes of Migration in South Africa national migration survey, we analyze how individually held "own-future" versus alternative "household well-being" migration decision rules effect the intentions to migrate of male and female adults in South Africa. Results from the gender and marital status specific logistic regressions models show consistent support for the different gender-marital status decision rule thesis. Specifically, the "maximizing one's own future" neoclassical microeconomic theory proposition is more applicable for never married men and women, the "maximizing household income" proposition for married men with short-term migration intentions, and the "reduce household risk" proposition for longer time horizon migration intentions of married men and women. Results provide new evidence on the way household strategies and individual goals jointly affect intentions to move or stay.
新古典微观经济学和新家庭经济学关于移民决策规则的理论假设,会因性别、婚姻状况以及移民意向的时间框架而有所不同。在同一研究设计中对这两种理论进行比较检验的情况相对较少。利用南非全国移民调查“移民原因”的数据,我们分析了个人持有的“自身未来”与替代性“家庭福祉”移民决策规则如何影响南非成年男女的移民意向。针对性别和婚姻状况的特定逻辑回归模型结果,一致支持了不同性别 - 婚姻状况决策规则的论点。具体而言,“最大化自身未来”的新古典微观经济理论命题,更适用于从未结婚的男性和女性;“最大化家庭收入”命题适用于有短期移民意向的已婚男性;“降低家庭风险”命题适用于有较长时间跨度移民意向的已婚男性和女性。研究结果为家庭策略和个人目标共同影响迁移或留驻意向的方式提供了新证据。