• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舌下免疫疗法在日常医疗实践中的应用:不同治疗方案的疗效 - IPD 荟萃分析。

Sublingual immunotherapy in daily medical practice: effectiveness of different treatment schedules - IPD meta-analysis.

机构信息

Stallergènes GmbH, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):925-32. doi: 10.1185/03007991003659483.

DOI:10.1185/03007991003659483
PMID:20163297
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of perennial and co-seasonal high-dose sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) treatments as well as ultra-rush and classical titrations in a real-world setting for pollen allergens.

METHODS

An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed of three open, prospective observational studies on high-dose SLIT using IR-standardised allergen extracts in patients with allergic rhinitis with and without asthma.

RESULTS

In total, 1052 patients aged 24.9 years (mean) were treated with SLIT and included in this IPD meta-analysis. Individual studies and total data pool analyses revealed consistent improvements in rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores. Stratified analyses revealed consistent improvements in symptomatic score and medication score regardless of the type of sensitisation and type of treatment. Ultra-rush titration resulted in considerably more pronounced improvement in symptom scores than classical titration, possibly due to better compliance of patients receiving that supervised titration. Adverse events occurred in 24% of patients during titration and in 18% of patients during maintenance treatment. The vast majority of events (89% and 87%) were mild-to-moderate, predominantly local symptoms in the oral cavity. There were no differences detected between the study titration or treatment schedules. No serious adverse reactions were reported. Nearly all patients (88%) decided to continue SLIT after completion of the studies.

CONCLUSION

High-dose SLIT with seasonal allergens given as co-seasonal or perennial treatment appears to be effective and well-tolerated in daily medical practice. Improved compliance under ultra-rush titration and seasonal SLIT treatment may further enhance effectiveness. Randomised controlled trials are requested for the further evaluation of these findings.

摘要

目的

比较常年和季节性高剂量舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)治疗以及花粉过敏原超快速和经典滴定法在真实环境中的疗效。

方法

对 3 项使用标准化过敏原提取物进行高剂量 SLIT 的开放、前瞻性观察性研究进行个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,纳入有或无哮喘的变应性鼻炎患者。

结果

共有 1052 名年龄为 24.9 岁(平均)的患者接受 SLIT 治疗,并纳入本 IPD 荟萃分析。个体研究和总数据池分析均显示出鼻结膜炎症状评分的一致改善。分层分析显示,无论致敏类型和治疗类型如何,症状评分和药物评分均有一致改善。超快速滴定法导致症状评分的改善明显更为显著,可能是因为接受该监督滴定法的患者具有更好的依从性。在滴定过程中有 24%的患者发生不良事件,在维持治疗中有 18%的患者发生不良事件。绝大多数事件(89%和 87%)为轻至中度,主要为口腔局部症状。在研究滴定或治疗方案之间未发现差异。未报告严重不良反应。几乎所有患者(88%)在完成研究后决定继续 SLIT。

结论

季节性过敏原的高剂量 SLIT 作为季节性或常年治疗似乎在日常医疗实践中是有效且耐受良好的。超快速滴定和季节性 SLIT 治疗下的依从性提高可能进一步增强疗效。需要进行随机对照试验以进一步评估这些发现。

相似文献

1
Sublingual immunotherapy in daily medical practice: effectiveness of different treatment schedules - IPD meta-analysis.舌下免疫疗法在日常医疗实践中的应用:不同治疗方案的疗效 - IPD 荟萃分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):925-32. doi: 10.1185/03007991003659483.
2
Efficacy of grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy for three consecutive seasons and after cessation of treatment: the ECRIT study.连续三个季节及停止治疗后草花粉舌下免疫疗法的疗效:ECRIT研究
Allergy. 2009 Jan;64(1):179-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01875.x. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
3
Efficacy and safety of high-doses sublingual immunotherapy in ultra-rush scheme in children allergic to grass pollen.高剂量舌下免疫疗法超快速方案治疗草花粉过敏儿童的疗效与安全性
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Mar;39(3):401-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03159.x. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
4
Sublingual immunotherapy with once-daily grass allergen tablets: a randomized controlled trial in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.每日一次舌下含服草花粉变应原片剂免疫疗法:季节性变应性鼻结膜炎的一项随机对照试验
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Apr;117(4):802-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1358.
5
Sublingual-oral administration of standardized allergenic extracts: phase 1 safety and dosing results.标准化变应原提取物的舌下-口服给药:1期安全性和剂量结果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 May;100(5):475-81. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60474-7.
6
Specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis to grass and tree pollens in daily medical practice-symptom load with sublingual immunotherapy compared to subcutaneous immunotherapy.在日常医疗实践中针对草花粉和树花粉过敏症的特异性免疫疗法-舌下免疫疗法与皮下免疫疗法相比的症状负荷。
Ann Med. 2011;43(6):418-24. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2011.595426. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
7
Efficacy of sublingual swallow immunotherapy in children with severe grass pollen allergic symptoms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.舌下含服吞咽免疫疗法治疗重度草花粉过敏症状儿童的疗效:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Allergy. 2004 May;59(5):498-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00457.x.
8
Rush sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria allergic patients.对墙草属过敏患者进行速发型舌下免疫疗法。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 Jul-Aug;24(4):146-51.
9
Efficacy of sublingual specific immunotherapy in intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis in children: an observational case-control study on 171 patients. The EFESO-children multicenter trial.舌下特异性免疫治疗对儿童间歇性和持续性变应性鼻炎的疗效:171 例患者的观察性病例对照研究。EFESO-儿童多中心试验。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009 Nov;20(7):660-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2009.00860.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
10
Efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy with grass allergens for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis-based comparison.皮下和舌下免疫疗法治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效:基于荟萃分析的比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Nov;130(5):1097-1107.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Coseasonal initiation of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy in children and adult patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.在患有变应性鼻结膜炎的儿童和成人患者中,同时开始青蒿舌下免疫疗法。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):843-850. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09088-9. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Clinical Practice Guideline: Immunotherapy for Inhalant Allergy.临床实践指南:变应原吸入性免疫疗法。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Mar;170 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-S42. doi: 10.1002/ohn.648.
3
Shortened up-dosing with sublingual immunotherapy drops containing tree allergens is well tolerated and elicits dose-dependent clinical effects during the first pollen season.
含有树木过敏原的舌下免疫治疗滴剂缩短给药方案耐受性良好,并在第一个花粉季节引发剂量依赖性临床效果。
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Mar 8;12(2):100012. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100012. eCollection 2019.
4
Management of Grass Pollen Allergy with 5-Grass Pollen Tablet: Results of a 2-Year Real-Life Study.使用五草花粉片治疗草花粉过敏:一项为期两年的真实生活研究结果
Adv Ther. 2017 Jun;34(6):1382-1397. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0535-6. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
Sublingual Immunotherapy with a Five-Grass Pollen Tablet in Adult Patients with Allergic Rhinitis: An Open, Prospective, Noninterventional, Multicenter Study.成人过敏性鼻炎患者使用五草花粉片进行舌下免疫治疗:一项开放、前瞻性、非干预性、多中心研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:584291. doi: 10.1155/2015/584291. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
6
"The value of pre- and co-seasonal sublingual immunotherapy in pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis".花粉诱导的变应性鼻结膜炎中季前和共季节舌下免疫疗法的价值
Clin Transl Allergy. 2015 May 4;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0061-z. eCollection 2015.
7
Sublingual immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.舌下免疫疗法治疗变应性鼻结膜炎患者。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011 Apr;11(2):131-8. doi: 10.1007/s11882-011-0176-9.
8
Immunotherapy for allergies and asthma: present and future.过敏和哮喘的免疫疗法:现状与未来。
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010 Jun;10(3):276-88. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 21.