Centre for Health, Exercise & Sports Medicine, Melbourne Physiotherapy School, University of Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Feb 17;11:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-36.
BACKGROUND: This randomised, single-blind controlled pilot trial aimed to determine the effectiveness of a physiotherapy program, including exercise and manual therapy, in reducing impairments and improving physical function and health-related quality of life in people with a history of painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture. METHODS: 20 participants were randomly allocated to an intervention (n = 11) or control (n = 9) group. The intervention group attended individual sessions with an experienced clinician once a week for 10 weeks and performed daily home exercises with adherence monitored by a self-report diary. The control group received no treatment. Blinded assessment was conducted at baseline and 11 weeks. Questionnaires assessed self-reported changes in back pain, physical function, and health-related quality of life. Objective measures of thoracic kyphosis, back and shoulder muscle endurance (Timed Loaded Standing Test), and function (Timed Up and Go test) were also taken. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significant reductions in pain during movement (mean difference (95% CI) -1.8 (-3.5 to -0.1)) and at rest (-2.0 (-3.8 to -0.2)) and significantly greater improvements in Qualeffo physical function (-4.8 (-9.2 to -0.5)) and the Timed Loaded Standing test (46.7 (16.1 to 77.3) secs). For the perceived change in back pain over the 10 weeks, 9/11 (82%) participants in the intervention group rated their pain as 'much better' compared with only 1/9 (11%) participants in the control group. CONCLUSION: Despite the modest sample size, these results support the benefits of exercise and manual therapy in the clinical management of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but need to be confirmed in a larger sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00638768.
背景:本随机、单盲对照试验旨在探讨运动疗法和手法治疗对缓解疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的功能障碍、提高躯体功能和健康相关生活质量的效果。
方法:20 名患者被随机分为干预组(n=11)和对照组(n=9)。干预组每周接受一次由经验丰富的临床医生提供的个体化治疗,持续 10 周,并在家中每天进行锻炼,通过自我报告日记来监测依从性。对照组不接受任何治疗。在基线和 11 周时进行盲法评估。使用问卷评估腰痛、躯体功能和健康相关生活质量的自我报告变化。还进行了胸椎后凸、背部和肩部肌肉耐力(计时起立行走测试)和功能(计时起立行走测试)的客观测量。
结果:与对照组相比,干预组在运动时(平均差值(95%置信区间)-1.8(-3.5 至-0.1))和休息时(-2.0(-3.8 至-0.2))的疼痛显著减轻,在 Qualeffo 躯体功能(-4.8(-9.2 至-0.5))和计时起立行走测试(46.7(16.1 至 77.3)秒)方面有显著改善。在 10 周的时间里,11 名(91%)干预组患者认为腰痛有“明显改善”,而对照组只有 1 名(11%)患者认为腰痛有“明显改善”。
结论:尽管样本量较小,但这些结果支持运动疗法和手法治疗对骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的临床管理有益,但其结果需要在更大的样本中得到证实。
试验注册:NCT00638768。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-4-30
Mult Scler. 2016-10
Healthcare (Basel). 2025-7-18
Osteoporos Int. 2008-7
Phys Ther. 2007-5
Osteoporos Int. 2007-5
Eur Spine J. 2007-8
Eur Spine J. 2006-12