• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末关怀政策:它们在实践中有区别吗?

End of life care policies: do they make a difference in practice?

机构信息

University of Saskatchewan, College of Nursing, Room 423 Ellis Hall, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5E5.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1166-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.019
PMID:20163901
Abstract

Although institutional policies related to care at the end of life (EOL) are a common feature of hospitals, there has been little examination of the ways in which these policies shape the focus and provision of care. The question asked in this study was "What effect do institutional policies relating to care at the EOL have on practice?" Data were drawn from health record reviews of 310 adults who had died in 3 acute care facilities in a major urban centre of a Western Canadian health region. Medical orders relating to care at the end of life were written for the majority of decedents, highlighting the value providers placed on care planning during this time. Relatively few providers, however, followed policy directives regarding use of care plans, terminology or documentation of discussions with patients and families about treatment plans. The findings of this study demonstrate a significant gap between institutional EOL care policies and practice in this health region, challenging institutional decision makers and front-line providers to collaborate more effectively to devise clinically relevant policies that enhance patient care at a particularly vulnerable time of life.

摘要

尽管与终末关怀相关的机构政策是医院的一个常见特征,但很少有人研究这些政策如何影响关怀的重点和提供方式。本研究提出的问题是“与终末关怀相关的机构政策对实践有什么影响?”数据来自于对在加拿大西部一个主要城市地区的 3 家急症护理机构去世的 310 名成年人的健康记录审查。为大多数死者书写了终末关怀医疗医嘱,这突显了提供者在此期间对护理计划的重视。然而,相对较少的提供者遵循关于使用护理计划、术语或记录与患者和家属讨论治疗计划的政策指令。这项研究的结果表明,在该卫生区域,机构的终末关怀政策与实践之间存在显著差距,这对机构决策者和一线提供者提出了挑战,需要他们更有效地合作,制定更具临床相关性的政策,在生命特别脆弱的时刻提高患者护理水平。

相似文献

1
End of life care policies: do they make a difference in practice?终末关怀政策:它们在实践中有区别吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1166-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
2
Quality of end-of-life care between medical oncologists and other physician specialists for Taiwanese cancer decedents, 2001-2006.2001-2006 年台湾癌症死亡患者的肿瘤内科医生与其他专科医生临终关怀质量比较。
Oncologist. 2009 Dec;14(12):1232-41. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0095. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
3
Am I doing the right thing? Provider perspectives on improving palliative care in the emergency department.我做得对吗?医疗服务提供者对改善急诊科姑息治疗的看法。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;54(1):86-93, 93.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
4
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
5
Patients' and healthcare providers' understandings of life-sustaining treatment: are perceptions of goals shared or divergent?患者与医疗服务提供者对维持生命治疗的理解:目标认知是一致还是存在分歧?
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(1):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.023. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
6
Hospital policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada.加拿大医院关于维持生命治疗和预先指示的政策。
CMAJ. 1994 Apr 15;150(8):1265-70.
7
End of life decision-making for cancer patients.癌症患者的临终决策。
Prim Care. 2009 Dec;36(4):811-23; table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.07.006.
8
How physicians approach advance care planning in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.医生如何对轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病患者进行预立医疗计划。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002 Oct;102(10):541-4.
9
End-of-life in adults with congenital heart disease: a call for early communication.成人先天性心脏病的临终关怀:呼吁尽早沟通。
Int J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 22;155(3):383-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.050. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
10
Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia.医生、护士及亲属对患有痴呆症的疗养院患者临终决策的态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.016. Epub 2005 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional Objection to Voluntary Assisted Dying in Victoria, Australia: An Analysis of Publicly Available Policies.澳大利亚维多利亚州对自愿协助死亡的制度性反对:对公开政策的分析。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Sep;20(3):467-484. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10271-6. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Better Regulation of End-Of-Life Care: A Call For A Holistic Approach.优化终末期关怀监管:呼吁采取整体方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Dec;19(4):683-693. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10213-8. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Late decisions about treatment limitation in patients with cancer: empirical analysis of end-of-life practices in a haematology and oncology unit at a German university hospital.
癌症患者治疗限制的晚期决策:德国大学医院血液学和肿瘤学科室临终实践的实证分析
ESMO Open. 2020 Oct;5(5):e000950. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000950.
4
Examining the Gaps and Issues of End-of-Life Care among Older Population through the Lens of Socioecological Model-A Multi-Method Qualitative Study of Hong Kong.通过社会生态模型审视老年人口临终关怀的差距和问题:香港的一项多方法定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):5072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145072.
5
Diagnosing Gaps in the Development of Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.诊断姑息治疗和临终关怀发展中的差距:一项定性探索性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 24;17(1):151. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010151.
6
End-of-Life Care in Critical Condition.危重症临终关怀
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jan;105(1):58-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302189.
7
Is it recorded in the notes? Documentation of end-of-life care and preferred place to die discussions in the final weeks of life.是否有记录在案?记录生命末期最后几周的临终关怀和首选死亡地点讨论。
BMC Palliat Care. 2011 Nov 4;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-10-18.