Suppr超能文献

我做得对吗?医疗服务提供者对改善急诊科姑息治疗的看法。

Am I doing the right thing? Provider perspectives on improving palliative care in the emergency department.

作者信息

Smith Alexander K, Fisher Jonathan, Schonberg Mara A, Pallin Daniel J, Block Susan D, Forrow Lachlan, Phillips Russell S, McCarthy Ellen P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;54(1):86-93, 93.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 18.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Although the focus of emergency care is on the diagnosis and treatment of acute illnesses and injuries or the stabilization of patients for ongoing treatment, some patients may benefit from a palliative approach. Little is known about delivering palliative care in the emergency department (ED). We explore the attitudes, experiences, and beliefs of emergency providers about palliative care in the ED, using structured qualitative methods.

METHODS

We studied 3 focus groups with 26 providers, including 14 physicians (10 residents, 4 attending physicians), 6 nurses, 2 social workers, and 4 technicians, working in 2 academic EDs in Boston. We used a grounded theory approach to code responses, resolving discrepancies by consensus.

RESULTS

Six distinct themes emerged: (1) participants equated palliative care with end-of-life care; (2) participants disagreed about the feasibility and desirability of providing palliative care in the ED; (3) patients for whom a palliative approach has been established often visit the ED because family members are distressed by end-of-life symptoms; (4) lack of communication between outpatient and ED providers leads to undesirable outcomes (eg, resuscitation of patients with a do-not-resuscitate order); (5) conflict around withholding life-prolonging treatment is common (eg, between patient's family and written advance directives); and (6) training in pain management is inadequate.

CONCLUSION

Providers ranked improved communication and documentation from outpatient providers as their highest priority for improvement. Attitudinal and structural barriers may need to be overcome to improve palliative care in the ED. Despite targeted recruitment, attending physician participation was low.

摘要

研究目的

尽管急诊护理的重点是急性疾病和损伤的诊断与治疗,或使患者病情稳定以便进行后续治疗,但有些患者可能会从姑息治疗方法中受益。对于在急诊科提供姑息治疗,我们了解得还很少。我们采用结构化定性方法,探讨急诊医护人员对急诊科姑息治疗的态度、经验和看法。

方法

我们对26名医护人员进行了3个焦点小组研究,其中包括在波士顿两家学术性急诊科工作的14名医生(10名住院医生、4名主治医生)、6名护士、2名社会工作者和4名技术人员。我们采用扎根理论方法对回答进行编码,通过共识解决分歧。

结果

出现了六个不同的主题:(1)参与者将姑息治疗等同于临终关怀;(2)参与者对在急诊科提供姑息治疗的可行性和可取性存在分歧;(3)已确立姑息治疗方法的患者经常前往急诊科,因为家庭成员因临终症状而痛苦;(4)门诊和急诊科医护人员之间缺乏沟通会导致不良后果(例如,对有“不要复苏”医嘱的患者进行复苏);(5)在停止延长生命治疗方面存在冲突很常见(例如,患者家属与书面预先指示之间);(6)疼痛管理培训不足。

结论

医护人员将改善门诊医护人员的沟通和记录列为最需要改进的方面。可能需要克服态度和结构上的障碍,以改善急诊科的姑息治疗。尽管有针对性地进行了招募,但主治医生的参与度较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验