新的国家比较效果研究计划的五个后续步骤。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research.

作者信息

VanLare Jordan M, Conway Patrick H, Sox Harold C

机构信息

Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):970-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1000096. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMp1000096

PMID:20164480

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research.新的国家比较效果研究计划的五个后续步骤。

N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):970-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1000096. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report.比较疗效研究：进展报告。

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 5;153(7):469-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-7-201010050-00269. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Comparative effectiveness research in radiology: patients, physicians and policy makers.放射学中的比较效果研究：患者、医生和政策制定者。

Acad Radiol. 2011 Sep;18(9):1067-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

IOM task impossible: set the agenda for neurological comparative effectiveness research.医学研究所在做不可能的事：设定神经学比较效果研究议程。

Ann Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(5):A4-6. doi: 10.1002/ana.21913.

Identifying child health priorities for comparative effectiveness research from the IOM's Report.

Acad Pediatr. 2010 May-Jun;10(3):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 15.

Letter from North America: The United States government's comparative effectiveness research program.来自北美的信：美国政府的比较效果研究计划。

Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):342-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00364.x.

Science and the stiumulus. Medicine under the microscope.科学与刺激。显微镜下的医学。

Science. 2009 Nov 27;326(5957):1183-5. doi: 10.1126/science.326.5957.1183.

How a unique provision in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act set a foundation for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.《美国复苏与再投资法案》中的一项独特条款如何为以患者为中心的结果研究协会奠定了基础。

J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):565-6. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.59.

Comparative effectiveness. An idea whose time has finally come.比较效果。一个时机终于成熟的理念。

Manag Care. 2009 Apr;18(4):14-6, 19-21.

The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act investment in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned and implications for future investments.《美国复苏与再投资法案》对比较效果研究的投资：经验教训及对未来投资的启示。

J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):559. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.75.

引用本文的文献

Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE).健康研究优先排序报告指南（REPRISE）。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 28;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3.

Vasopressin versus norepinephrine in septic shock: a propensity score matched efficiency retrospective cohort study in the VASST coordinating center hospital.血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素治疗感染性休克的疗效比较：在VASST协调中心医院进行的一项倾向评分匹配的有效性回顾性队列研究

J Intensive Care. 2018 Nov 16;6:73. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0344-2. eCollection 2018.

Consulting patients in setting priorities in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.) research: findings from a national on-line survey.就肌痛性脑脊髓炎（ME）研究的优先事项咨询患者：一项全国在线调查的结果

Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Sep 28;1:11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0011-x. eCollection 2015.

General practitioners in Styria - who is willing to take part in research projects and why? : A survey by the Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research.施蒂利亚州的全科医生——谁愿意参与研究项目，以及为什么？：综合实践与健康服务研究所的一项调查。

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;129(21-22):823-834. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1244-5. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.近期关于比较效果研究调查的争议：挑战、机遇与陷阱。

Semin Perinatol. 2016 Oct;40(6):341-347. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

Investigation of comparative effectiveness research in Asia, Europe, and North America.亚洲、欧洲和北美的比较效果研究调查。

Indian J Pharmacol. 2015 Nov-Dec;47(6):585-93. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.169592.

Prothrombin Time and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study in a Million-Patient Sample.凝血酶原时间和活化部分凝血活酶时间检测：一项针对百万患者样本的比较有效性研究。

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0133317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133317. eCollection 2015.

What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation.有效促进公众参与医疗保健改善和政策决策的关键要素有哪些？一项随机试验的过程评估。

Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):319-50. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12060.

Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial.让患者参与医疗保健改进的优先级设定：一项集群随机试验。

Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 20;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-24.

High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research.高患病率但互补与替代医学证据有限：未来研究的指导方针。

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Feb 6;14:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-46.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验