新的国家比较效果研究计划的五个后续步骤。 - Suppr

Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research.

作者信息

VanLare Jordan M, Conway Patrick H, Sox Harold C

机构信息

Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):970-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1000096. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMp1000096

PMID:20164480

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research.

N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):970-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1000096. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report.

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 5;153(7):469-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-7-201010050-00269. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Comparative effectiveness research in radiology: patients, physicians and policy makers.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Sep;18(9):1067-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

IOM task impossible: set the agenda for neurological comparative effectiveness research.

Ann Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(5):A4-6. doi: 10.1002/ana.21913.

Identifying child health priorities for comparative effectiveness research from the IOM's Report.

Acad Pediatr. 2010 May-Jun;10(3):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 15.

Letter from North America: The United States government's comparative effectiveness research program.

Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):342-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00364.x.

Science and the stiumulus. Medicine under the microscope.

Science. 2009 Nov 27;326(5957):1183-5. doi: 10.1126/science.326.5957.1183.

How a unique provision in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act set a foundation for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):565-6. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.59.

Comparative effectiveness. An idea whose time has finally come.

Manag Care. 2009 Apr;18(4):14-6, 19-21.

The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act investment in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned and implications for future investments.

J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):559. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.75.

引用本文的文献

Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE).

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 28;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3.

Vasopressin versus norepinephrine in septic shock: a propensity score matched efficiency retrospective cohort study in the VASST coordinating center hospital.

J Intensive Care. 2018 Nov 16;6:73. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0344-2. eCollection 2018.

Consulting patients in setting priorities in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.) research: findings from a national on-line survey.

Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Sep 28;1:11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0011-x. eCollection 2015.

General practitioners in Styria - who is willing to take part in research projects and why? : A survey by the Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research.

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Nov;129(21-22):823-834. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1244-5. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.

Semin Perinatol. 2016 Oct;40(6):341-347. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

Investigation of comparative effectiveness research in Asia, Europe, and North America.

Indian J Pharmacol. 2015 Nov-Dec;47(6):585-93. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.169592.

Prothrombin Time and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study in a Million-Patient Sample.

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0133317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133317. eCollection 2015.

What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation.

Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):319-50. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12060.

Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial.

Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 20;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-24.

High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research.

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Feb 6;14:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-46.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献