Childs Nicola, Robinson Lisa, Chowdhury Sonya, Ogden Clare, Newton Julia L
Clinical Academic Office, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK.
Action for M.E, 42 Temple Street, Keynsham, BS31 1EH UK.
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Sep 28;1:11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0011-x. eCollection 2015.
Myalgic encephalitis (M.E.) is a common condition, the cause of which is not known and there are no treatments available. In this study the national patient support group Action for M.E. sought the opinions of their members via an online survey as to what they felt should be future priorities for M.E.
Respondents were asked what they considered first, second and third research priorities to be from a list of 13 pre-defined options. Individuals were invited to provide additional free text comments about Action for M.E.'s research priorities in general. Of the 1144 respondents: 822 had M.E.; 94 were a supporting a member of Action for M.E. ; 66 were carers for someone with M.E.; 26 were professionals with an interest in M.E.; 136 had a family member or colleague with M.E. Individuals selected more than one category as applicable. The top five research priorities identified were: disease processes to achieve a better understanding of the causes of M.E.; more effective treatments; faster and more accurate diagnosis; clinical course of M.E.; outcomes and natural history; and severely affected patients. Least popular priorities were: sleep; economic research towards identifying the cost of ME; and psychological aspects. Much of the free text comments emphasised the importance of funding biomedical research into disease processes to achieve a better understanding of the causes of M.E. Three themes were identified in relation to this topic: accurate diagnosis and awareness; risk factors and causes; drug development and curative therapies. In conclusion; individuals affected by M.E. have clear views regarding priorities for research investment. These have informed Action for M.E.'s ongoing research strategy and ultimately will inform national and international research priorities.
肌痛性脑脊髓炎(M.E.)是一种常见病症,其病因不明且尚无可用的治疗方法。在本研究中,全国患者支持组织“肌痛性脑脊髓炎行动”通过在线调查征求其成员对于肌痛性脑脊髓炎未来研究重点的看法。
受访者被要求从13个预先定义的选项列表中指出他们认为的首要、次要和第三研究重点。邀请个人就“肌痛性脑脊髓炎行动”的研究重点总体提供额外的自由文本评论。在1144名受访者中:822人患有肌痛性脑脊髓炎;94人是“肌痛性脑脊髓炎行动”的支持者;66人是肌痛性脑脊髓炎患者的护理人员;26人是对肌痛性脑脊髓炎感兴趣的专业人员;136人有家庭成员或同事患有肌痛性脑脊髓炎。个人根据适用情况选择了多个类别。确定的前五项研究重点是:疾病过程,以更好地了解肌痛性脑脊髓炎的病因;更有效的治疗方法;更快、更准确的诊断;肌痛性脑脊髓炎的临床病程;结局和自然史;以及重症患者。最不受欢迎的重点是:睡眠;确定肌痛性脑脊髓炎成本的经济学研究;以及心理方面。大部分自由文本评论强调了为疾病过程的生物医学研究提供资金以更好地了解肌痛性脑脊髓炎病因的重要性。关于该主题确定了三个主题:准确诊断和认知;风险因素和病因;药物开发和治疗性疗法。总之,受肌痛性脑脊髓炎影响的个人对研究投资重点有明确的看法。这些看法为“肌痛性脑脊髓炎行动”正在进行的研究战略提供了参考,最终也将为国家和国际研究重点提供参考。