Victoria University, Australia.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(6):346-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328337b1c6.
To compare the performance of three risk scores (ABCD, ABCD2 and California) in identification of short-term stroke risk in patients with emergency department (ED) diagnosis of transient ischaemic attack. In the retrospective cohort study, information collected included features of clinical risk scores, demographic, clinical and outcome data. The outcome of interest was new stroke occurrence at 2, 7 and 30 days. Data underwent receiver operating curve analyses. Of 326 patients, 17 patients experienced a new stroke within 30 days (4.9%, 95% confidence interval: 2.9-8.0%). C-statistic for high-stroke risk was not significantly different between scores at 2, 7 or 30 days. Using cutoffs of defined risk score cutoffs, the negative predictive values for stroke within 30 days were 97.4% (California), 99.1% (ABCD) and 98.9% (ABCD2), respectively. All three risk scores predict short-term risk of stroke in patients with an ED diagnosis of transient ischaemic attack and could be an effective tool to guide clinical decision making.
比较三种风险评分(ABCD、ABCD2 和加利福尼亚)在识别急诊科(ED)诊断为短暂性脑缺血发作患者短期卒中风险中的表现。在回顾性队列研究中,收集的信息包括临床风险评分的特征、人口统计学、临床和结局数据。感兴趣的结局是 2、7 和 30 天内发生新的卒中。数据进行了接收器工作特征曲线分析。在 326 名患者中,17 名患者在 30 天内发生新的卒中(4.9%,95%置信区间:2.9-8.0%)。在 2、7 或 30 天时,高卒中风险评分的 C 统计量没有显著差异。使用定义的风险评分切点,30 天内卒中的阴性预测值分别为 97.4%(加利福尼亚)、99.1%(ABCD)和 98.9%(ABCD2)。这三种风险评分均能预测急诊科诊断为短暂性脑缺血发作患者的短期卒中风险,可作为指导临床决策的有效工具。