Suppr超能文献

比较评分系统预测急诊科短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中风险的预后性能。

Comparison of prognostic performance of scores to predict risk of stroke in ED patients with transient ischaemic attack.

机构信息

Victoria University, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(6):346-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328337b1c6.

Abstract

To compare the performance of three risk scores (ABCD, ABCD2 and California) in identification of short-term stroke risk in patients with emergency department (ED) diagnosis of transient ischaemic attack. In the retrospective cohort study, information collected included features of clinical risk scores, demographic, clinical and outcome data. The outcome of interest was new stroke occurrence at 2, 7 and 30 days. Data underwent receiver operating curve analyses. Of 326 patients, 17 patients experienced a new stroke within 30 days (4.9%, 95% confidence interval: 2.9-8.0%). C-statistic for high-stroke risk was not significantly different between scores at 2, 7 or 30 days. Using cutoffs of defined risk score cutoffs, the negative predictive values for stroke within 30 days were 97.4% (California), 99.1% (ABCD) and 98.9% (ABCD2), respectively. All three risk scores predict short-term risk of stroke in patients with an ED diagnosis of transient ischaemic attack and could be an effective tool to guide clinical decision making.

摘要

比较三种风险评分(ABCD、ABCD2 和加利福尼亚)在识别急诊科(ED)诊断为短暂性脑缺血发作患者短期卒中风险中的表现。在回顾性队列研究中,收集的信息包括临床风险评分的特征、人口统计学、临床和结局数据。感兴趣的结局是 2、7 和 30 天内发生新的卒中。数据进行了接收器工作特征曲线分析。在 326 名患者中,17 名患者在 30 天内发生新的卒中(4.9%,95%置信区间:2.9-8.0%)。在 2、7 或 30 天时,高卒中风险评分的 C 统计量没有显著差异。使用定义的风险评分切点,30 天内卒中的阴性预测值分别为 97.4%(加利福尼亚)、99.1%(ABCD)和 98.9%(ABCD2)。这三种风险评分均能预测急诊科诊断为短暂性脑缺血发作患者的短期卒中风险,可作为指导临床决策的有效工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验