Baskent University, School of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):50-7. doi: 10.2341/09-051-L.
To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a nano-composite, a flowable nano-composite and a nano glass ionomer to dentin in vitro.
Sixty human molars were ground flat, exposing the dentin surfaces, and they were randomly divided into five groups according to the restorative materials and adhesive systems used (n = 12/group). The restoratives were applied to all dentin surfaces according to the manufacturer's instructions, using a special jig (Ultradent) in the following manner: Group 1: a nano-composite (NC) (Filtek Supreme XT-3M ESPE) was applied with a two-step self-etch adhesive (SE) (Adper SE Plus-3M ESPE); Group 2: NC was applied with an etch&rinse adhesive (SB) (Adper Single Bond 2-3M ESPE); Group 3: a flowable nano-composite (FNC, Filtek Supreme XT Flow-3M ESPE) was applied with SE; Group 4: FNC was applied with SB and Group 5: a nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer (Ketac N100-3M ESPE) was applied with Ketac Nano Primer (3M ESPE). The bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37 degrees C, 24 hours) and tested for SBS in a universal testing machine (1 mm/minute). Two specimens from each group were subjected to SEM evaluations of the adhesive interfaces. Failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope. The mean SBS values were calculated and the data were analyzed with the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests (p < 0.05).
Mean SBS values (MPa) for the groups were 13.64; 7.83; 11.20; 4.12 and 0.64 for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Group 1 exhibited a significantly higher value than all the other groups; whereas, Group 5 had the lowest value (p < 0.05). The SE adhesive yielded higher bond values than the SB adhesive with NC and FNC restorative materials. Failure modes in all the groups were primarily adhesive.
The results demonstrate the capacity of the current two-step self-etch adhesive to outperform the etch&rinse adhesive in conjunction with the two nano-restoratives tested.
评估一种纳米复合树脂、一种流动性纳米复合树脂和一种纳米玻璃离子体在体外对牙本质的剪切结合强度(SBS)。
将 60 颗人磨牙磨平,暴露牙本质表面,然后根据使用的修复材料和粘接系统随机分为 5 组(每组 n = 12)。按照制造商的说明,使用特殊夹具(Ultradent)将修复材料应用于所有牙本质表面:第 1 组:应用纳米复合树脂(Filtek Supreme XT-3M ESPE)和两步自酸蚀粘接剂(SE)(Adper SE Plus-3M ESPE);第 2 组:应用酸蚀-冲洗粘接剂(SB)(Adper Single Bond 2-3M ESPE);第 3 组:应用流动性纳米复合树脂(FNC,Filtek Supreme XT Flow-3M ESPE)和 SE;第 4 组:应用 FNC 和 SB;第 5 组:应用纳米填充树脂改性玻璃离子体(Ketac N100-3M ESPE)和 Ketac Nano Primer(3M ESPE)。将粘结标本在蒸馏水中(37 度,24 小时)储存,并在万能试验机上以 1mm/min 的速度测试 SBS。每组取 2 个标本进行粘接界面的 SEM 评价。使用立体显微镜确定失效模式。计算平均 SBS 值,并使用 Kruskal Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney-U 检验进行数据分析(p < 0.05)。
各组的平均 SBS 值(MPa)分别为 13.64;7.83;11.20;4.12 和 0.64,依次为第 1、2、3、4 和 5 组。第 1 组的数值明显高于其他各组,而第 5 组的数值最低(p < 0.05)。SE 粘接剂与 NC 和 FNC 修复材料结合时,产生的粘结值高于 SB 粘接剂。所有组的失效模式均主要为粘结性失效。
结果表明,目前的两步自酸蚀粘接剂能够优于结合两种测试纳米修复体的酸蚀-冲洗粘接剂。