Suppr超能文献

新型大块充填碱硅玻璃陶瓷与传统修复材料的力学和物理性能比较评估

Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials.

作者信息

Naz Fariha, Samad Khan Abdul, Kader Mohammed Abdul, Al Gelban Lamis Omar Saad, Mousa Nada Mohammed Ali, Asiri Raghad Saeed Hader, Hakeem Abbas Saeed

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62521, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2021 Nov;33(7):666-673. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite.

METHODOLOGY

Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

RESULTS

For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.

摘要

目的

将一种新商业化的牙科修复材料(碱式硅酸铝)的物理和机械性能与玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)和纳米混合复合材料进行比较。

方法

使用人类拔除的前磨牙来研究剪切粘结强度。将修复材料放置在牙本质表面,并在去离子水中老化14天。在咀嚼模拟循环(50,000次)前后评估三维表面粗糙度。使用咀嚼模拟器对样品进行机械疲劳测试,并用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行研究。

结果

对于剪切粘结强度,碱式硅酸铝的值显著高于GIC,而碱式硅酸铝与纳米混合复合材料之间未观察到显著差异。咀嚼模拟(50,000次循环)后,GIC和纳米混合复合材料之间未发现显著差异,其中GIC的表面粗糙度值最高,碱式硅酸铝的最低。

结论

新开发的修复材料(碱式硅酸铝)比现有修复材料表现出更好的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc7/8589597/0c12ef9387e8/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验