Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):20-5. doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3307.
Increases in body mass index (BMI) are reported to influence asthma severity and response to treatment. This analysis was designed to explore whether increasing BMI altered the comparative response to treatment with either fluticasone propionate (FP) or montelukast. Two double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trials of 12-weeks duration comparing FP, 88 micrograms, twice daily or montelukast, 10 mg, daily were evaluated. Subjects with mild-moderate persistent asthma were retrospectively stratified by BMI of <20 kg/m(2) (underweight), 20-24.9 kg/m(2) (normal weight), 25-29.9 kg/m(2) (overweight), and > or =30 kg/m(2) (obese). Outcomes included mean changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and morning peak flow, daily albuterol use, and daily symptom scores. There were 1052 subjects evenly distributed between FP and montelukast by baseline parameters, including BMI. FP was statistically superior to montelukast for all BMI categories of normal, overweight, and obese subjects for FEV(1) (p < 0.008), morning peak flow (p < 0.002), albuterol use (p < 0.02), and symptom scores (p < 0.05). FP produced a significantly greater clinical response for normal, overweight, and obese subjects compared with montelukast. Irrespective of BMI, FP appears to be the more effective asthma controller therapy.
体重指数(BMI)的增加据报道会影响哮喘的严重程度和治疗反应。本分析旨在探讨 BMI 的增加是否改变了氟替卡松丙酸酯(FP)或孟鲁司特治疗的相对疗效。对两项为期 12 周的双盲、随机、平行组试验进行了评估,比较了 FP(88 微克,每日 2 次)或孟鲁司特(10 毫克,每日 1 次)。回顾性地按 BMI 将轻度至中度持续哮喘患者分层为<20 kg/m2(体重不足)、20-24.9 kg/m2(正常体重)、25-29.9 kg/m2(超重)和>或=30 kg/m2(肥胖)。结果包括 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和晨峰值流速、每日沙丁胺醇使用量和每日症状评分的平均变化。根据基线参数(包括 BMI),FP 和孟鲁司特组各有 1052 名患者均匀分布。对于所有正常、超重和肥胖 BMI 类别,FP 在 FEV1(p < 0.008)、晨峰值流速(p < 0.002)、沙丁胺醇使用量(p < 0.02)和症状评分(p < 0.05)方面均优于孟鲁司特。与孟鲁司特相比,FP 对正常、超重和肥胖患者产生了更显著的临床疗效。无论 BMI 如何,FP 似乎都是更有效的哮喘控制治疗药物。