Suppr超能文献

丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药比低剂量吸入性糖皮质激素加孟鲁司特能更有效地控制哮喘。

Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination provides more effective asthma control than low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus montelukast.

作者信息

Nelson H S, Busse W W, Kerwin E, Church N, Emmett A, Rickard K, Knobil K

机构信息

National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO 80206, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Dec;106(6):1088-95. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.110920.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a disease of chronic inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) provide important anti-inflammatory treatment but may not provide optimal control of asthma when taken alone. Two therapeutic alternatives for enhanced asthma control are to substitute the combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (FP/Salm Combo) through the Diskus inhaler or to add montelukast to existing ICS therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacy and safety of FP/Salm Combo through the Diskus inhaler versus montelukast added to FP (FP + montelukast) in patients whose symptoms were suboptimally controlled with ICS therapy.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week study in 447 patients with asthma who were symptomatic at baseline while receiving low-dose FP. Patients were treated for 12 weeks with one of the following: (1) combination of FP 100 microg plus salmeterol 50 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler, or (2) FP 100 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler plus oral montelukast 10 mg once daily.

RESULTS

FP/Salm Combo treatment provided better overall asthma control than FP + montelukast with significantly greater improvements in morning peak expiratory flow (+24.9 L/min vs +13.0 L/min, P <.001), evening peak expiratory flow (+18.9 L/min vs +9.6 L/min, P <.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (+0.34 L vs +0.20 L, P <.001), as well as a change in the percentage of days with no albuterol use (+26.3% vs +19.1%, P =.032) and the shortness of breath symptom score (-0.56 vs -0.40, P =.017). The groups had comparable improvements in chest tightness, wheeze, and overall symptom scores. Asthma exacerbation rates were significantly lower (P =.031) in the FP/Salm Combo group (4 patients, 2%) than in the FP + montelukast group (13 patients, 6%). Adverse event profiles were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic patients on low-dose ICS therapy had significantly greater improvement in asthma control when switched to the FP/Salm Combo than when montelukast was added to ICS therapy.

摘要

背景

哮喘是一种慢性炎症和支气管收缩性疾病。吸入性糖皮质激素(ICSs)提供重要的抗炎治疗,但单独使用时可能无法提供最佳的哮喘控制。两种增强哮喘控制的治疗选择是通过都保吸入器使用丙酸氟替卡松(FP)和沙美特罗的联合制剂(FP/沙美特罗联合制剂),或在现有的ICS治疗基础上加用孟鲁司特。

目的

我们比较了通过都保吸入器使用FP/沙美特罗联合制剂与在FP基础上加用孟鲁司特(FP+孟鲁司特)对ICS治疗症状控制不佳的患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们对447例哮喘患者进行了一项多中心、双盲、双模拟、平行组、为期12周的研究,这些患者在基线时接受低剂量FP治疗且有症状。患者接受以下一种治疗,为期12周:(1)通过都保吸入器每日两次吸入100μg FP加50μg沙美特罗的联合制剂,或(2)通过都保吸入器每日两次吸入100μg FP加每日一次口服10mg孟鲁司特。

结果

与FP+孟鲁司特相比,FP/沙美特罗联合制剂治疗在总体哮喘控制方面更好,在早晨呼气峰流速(+24.9L/分钟对+13.0L/分钟,P<.001)、晚上呼气峰流速(+18.9L/分钟对+9.6L/分钟,P<.001)和第1秒用力呼气容积(+0.34L对+0.20L,P<.001)方面有显著更大的改善,以及在无需使用沙丁胺醇的天数百分比变化(+26.3%对+19.1%,P=.032)和气短症状评分方面(-0.56对-0.40,P=.017)。两组在胸闷、喘息和总体症状评分方面有相当的改善。FP/沙美特罗联合制剂组的哮喘加重率(4例患者,2%)显著低于FP+孟鲁司特组(13例患者,6%)(P=.031)。不良事件情况相当。

结论

低剂量ICS治疗的有症状患者转用FP/沙美特罗联合制剂时,在哮喘控制方面的改善显著大于在ICS治疗基础上加用孟鲁司特时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验