评估连续血糖监测警报效用的方法。

Methods of evaluating the utility of continuous glucose monitor alerts.

作者信息

Kamath Apurv, Mahalingam Aarthi, Brauker James

机构信息

DexCom Inc., San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):57-66. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400108.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) alert performance should reflect patient use in real time. By evaluating alerts as real-time events, their ability to both detect and predict low and high blood glucose (BG) events can be examined.

METHOD

True alerts (TA) were defined as a CGM alert occurring within +/- 30 minutes from the beginning of a low or a high BG event. The TA time to detection was calculated as [time of CGM alert] - [beginning of event]. False alerts (FA) were defined as a BG event outside of the alert zone within +/- 30 minutes from a CGM alert. Analysis was performed comparing DexCom SEVEN PLUS CGM data to BG measured with a laboratory analyzer.

RESULTS

Of 49 low glucose events (BG < or =70 mg/dl), with the CGM alert set to 90 mg/dl, the TA rate was 91.8%. For 50% of TAs, the CGM alert preceded the event by at least 21 minutes. The FA rate was 25.0%. Similar results were found for high alerts.

CONCLUSION

Continuous glucose monitor alerts are capable of both detecting and predicting low and high BG events. The setting of alerts entails a trade-off between predictive ability and FA rate. Realistic analysis of this trade-off will guide patients in the effective utilization of CGM.

摘要

背景

连续血糖监测(CGM)警报性能的评估应反映患者的实时使用情况。通过将警报评估为实时事件,可以检查其检测和预测低血糖和高血糖(BG)事件的能力。

方法

真警报(TA)定义为在低血糖或高血糖事件开始后的+/- 30分钟内发生的CGM警报。TA检测时间计算为[CGM警报时间]-[事件开始时间]。假警报(FA)定义为在CGM警报后的+/- 30分钟内处于警报区域之外的BG事件。进行分析以比较德康SEVEN PLUS CGM数据与实验室分析仪测量的BG。

结果

在49次低血糖事件(BG≤70mg/dl)中,将CGM警报设置为90mg/dl时,TA率为91.8%。对于50%的TA,CGM警报比事件提前至少21分钟。FA率为25.0%。高警报也发现了类似结果。

结论

连续血糖监测警报能够检测和预测低血糖和高血糖事件。警报设置需要在预测能力和FA率之间进行权衡。对这种权衡进行现实分析将指导患者有效利用CGM。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索