Suppr超能文献

用于替代传统血糖监测的连续血糖监测仪的警报特征描述。

Alarm characterization for a continuous glucose monitor that replaces traditional blood glucose monitoring.

作者信息

McGarraugh Geoffrey

机构信息

Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):49-56. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400107.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices available in the United States are approved for use as adjuncts to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG); all CGM alarms require SMBG confirmation before treatment. In this report, an analysis method is proposed to determine the CGM threshold alarm accuracy required to eliminate SMBG confirmation.

METHOD

The proposed method builds on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline for evaluating CGM threshold alarms using data from an in-clinic study of subjects with type 1 diabetes. The CLSI method proposes a maximum time limit of +/-30 minutes for the detection of hypo- and hyperglycemic events but does not include limits for glucose measurement accuracy. The International Standards Organization (ISO) standard for SMBG glucose measurement accuracy (ISO 15197) is +/-15 mg/dl for glucose <75 mg/dl and +/-20% for glucose > or = 75 mg/dl. This standard was combined with the CLSI method to more completely characterize the accuracy of CGM alarms.

RESULTS

Incorporating the ISO 15197 accuracy margins, FreeStyle Navigator CGM system alarms detected 70 mg/dl hypoglycemia within 30 minutes at a rate of 70.3%, with a false alarm rate of 11.4%. The device detected high glucose in the range of 140-300 mg/dl within 30 minutes at an average rate of 99.2%, with a false alarm rate of 2.1%.

CONCLUSION

Self-monitoring of blood glucose confirmation is necessary for detecting and treating hypoglycemia with the FreeStyle Navigator CGM system, but at high glucose levels, SMBG confirmation adds little incremental value to CGM alarms.

摘要

背景

美国现有的连续血糖监测(CGM)设备被批准用作血糖自我监测(SMBG)的辅助手段;所有CGM警报在治疗前都需要SMBG确认。在本报告中,提出了一种分析方法,以确定消除SMBG确认所需的CGM阈值警报准确性。

方法

所提出的方法基于临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指南,该指南使用来自1型糖尿病患者门诊研究的数据来评估CGM阈值警报。CLSI方法提出了检测低血糖和高血糖事件的最长时间限制为±30分钟,但不包括血糖测量准确性的限制。国际标准化组织(ISO)关于SMBG血糖测量准确性的标准(ISO 15197)对于血糖<75mg/dl为±15mg/dl,对于血糖≥75mg/dl为±20%。该标准与CLSI方法相结合,以更全面地描述CGM警报的准确性。

结果

纳入ISO 15197准确性容差后,FreeStyle Navigator CGM系统警报在30分钟内检测到70mg/dl低血糖的速率为70.3%,误报率为11.4%。该设备在30分钟内检测到140 - 300mg/dl范围内高血糖的平均速率为99.2%,误报率为2.1%。

结论

使用FreeStyle Navigator CGM系统检测和治疗低血糖时,血糖自我监测确认是必要的,但在高血糖水平时,SMBG确认对CGM警报几乎没有增加额外价值。

相似文献

8
Hypoglycemia alarm enhancement using data fusion.利用数据融合增强低血糖警报
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):34-40. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400105.
9
10
Hypo- and Hyperglycemic Alarms: Devices and Algorithms.低血糖和高血糖警报:设备与算法
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 30;9(5):1126-37. doi: 10.1177/1932296815583507.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验