用作血糖自我监测辅助手段的连续血糖监测仪的警报特征

Alarm characterization for continuous glucose monitors used as adjuncts to self-monitoring of blood glucose.

作者信息

McGarraugh Geoffrey

机构信息

Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, California, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):41-8. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400106.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices available in the United States are approved for use as adjuncts to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Alarm evaluation in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline for CGM does not specifically address devices that employ both CGM and SMBG. In this report, an alarm evaluation method is proposed for these devices.

METHOD

The proposed method builds on the CLSI method using data from an in-clinic study of subjects with type 1 diabetes. CGM was used to detect glycemic events, and SMBG was used to determine treatment. To optimize detection of a single glucose level, such as 70 mg/dl, a range of alarm threshold settings was evaluated. The alarm characterization provides a choice of alarm settings that trade off detection and false alarms. Detection of a range of high glucose levels was similarly evaluated.

RESULTS

Using low glucose alarms, detection of 70 mg/dl within 30 minutes increased from 64 to 97% as alarm settings increased from 70 to 100 mg/dl, and alarms that did not require treatment (SMBG >85 mg/dl) increased from 18 to 52%. Using high glucose alarms, detection of 180 mg/dl within 30 minutes increased from 87 to 96% as alarm settings decreased from 180 to 165 mg/dl, and alarms that did not require treatment (SMBG <180 mg/dl) increased from 24 to 42%.

CONCLUSION

The proposed alarm evaluation method provides information for choosing appropriate alarm thresholds and reflects the clinical utility of CGM alarms.

摘要

背景

美国现有的持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)设备被批准用作血糖自我监测(SMBG)的辅助手段。临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)关于CGM的指南中的警报评估并未专门涉及同时使用CGM和SMBG的设备。在本报告中,针对这些设备提出了一种警报评估方法。

方法

所提出的方法基于CLSI方法,使用来自1型糖尿病患者临床研究的数据。CGM用于检测血糖事件,SMBG用于确定治疗方案。为了优化对单一葡萄糖水平(如70mg/dl)的检测,评估了一系列警报阈值设置。警报特征提供了在检测和误报之间进行权衡的警报设置选择。对一系列高血糖水平的检测也进行了类似评估。

结果

使用低血糖警报时,随着警报设置从70mg/dl增加到100mg/dl,30分钟内检测到70mg/dl的比例从64%增加到97%,不需要治疗的警报(SMBG>85mg/dl)从18%增加到52%。使用高血糖警报时,随着警报设置从180mg/dl降低到165mg/dl,30分钟内检测到180mg/dl的比例从87%增加到96%,不需要治疗的警报(SMBG<180mg/dl)从24%增加到42%。

结论

所提出的警报评估方法为选择合适的警报阈值提供了信息,并反映了CGM警报的临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索