• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑改善饮食的政策干预措施?它会有效吗?它会发生吗?它会造成伤害吗?

Prioritizing policy interventions to improve diets? Will it work, can it happen, will it do harm?

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria 3122, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2010 Mar;25(1):123-33. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq003.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daq003
PMID:20167827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2824602/
Abstract

Policies from non-health sectors have considerable impacts on the food environment and in turn on population nutrition. Health impact assessment (HIA) methods have been developed to identify the potential health effects of non-health policies; however, they are underused both within and outside the health sector. HIA and other assessment methods and tools can be used more extensively in health promotion to assist with the identification of the best policy options to pursue to improve and protect health. A participatory process is presented in this paper which combines HIAs with feasibility and effectiveness assessments. The intention is to enable health promoters to more accurately identify which policy change options would be most likely to improve diets, considering both impact and likelihood of implementation. The process was successfully used in Fiji and Tonga and provided a more systematic way of understanding which policy interventions showed the most promise.

摘要

非卫生部门的政策对食品环境有重大影响,进而对人口营养产生影响。已经开发了健康影响评估 (HIA) 方法来确定非卫生政策的潜在健康影响;然而,它们在卫生部门内外都未得到充分利用。可以在更广泛的健康促进中使用 HIA 和其他评估方法和工具,以帮助确定最佳政策选择,以改善和保护健康。本文提出了一个参与式过程,将 HIA 与可行性和效果评估相结合。其目的是使健康促进者能够更准确地确定哪些政策变化选择最有可能改善饮食,同时考虑影响和实施的可能性。该过程在斐济和汤加成功使用,并提供了一种更系统的方法来了解哪些政策干预措施最有希望。

相似文献

1
Prioritizing policy interventions to improve diets? Will it work, can it happen, will it do harm?优先考虑改善饮食的政策干预措施?它会有效吗?它会发生吗?它会造成伤害吗?
Health Promot Int. 2010 Mar;25(1):123-33. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq003.
2
Evidence-informed process to identify policies that will promote a healthy food environment in the Pacific Islands.基于证据的过程,以确定将促进太平洋岛屿健康食品环境的政策。
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jun;13(6):886-92. doi: 10.1017/S136898001000011X. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
3
The role of policy in improving diets: experiences from the Pacific Obesity Prevention in Communities food policy project.政策在改善饮食中的作用:太平洋肥胖预防社区食品政策项目的经验。
Obes Rev. 2011 Nov;12 Suppl 2:68-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00910.x.
4
Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments: A Synthesis of Data From Five Impact Evaluation Reports.健康影响评估的有效性:来自五份影响评估报告的数据综合
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 30;13:E84. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150559.
5
The effectiveness of health impact assessment in influencing decision-making in Australia and New Zealand 2005-2009.2005-2009 年,健康影响评估在影响澳大利亚和新西兰决策方面的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 17;13:1188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1188.
6
Assessing the unintended health impacts of road transport policies and interventions: translating research evidence for use in policy and practice.评估道路运输政策与干预措施对健康的意外影响:将研究证据转化为政策与实践应用。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 30;8:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-339.
7
Systematic Literature Review of Health Impact Assessments in Low and Middle-Income Countries.系统文献综述:中低收入国家的健康影响评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 6;16(11):2018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112018.
8
Health impact assessment of agriculture and food policies: lessons learnt from the Republic of Slovenia.农业与食品政策的健康影响评估:斯洛文尼亚共和国的经验教训
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(6):391-8. Epub 2003 Jul 25.
9
Accounting for health in climate change policies: a case study of Fiji.气候变化政策中的健康考量:以斐济为例。
Glob Health Action. 2014 May 15;7:23550. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23550. eCollection 2014.
10
Health Impact Assessments in Spain: Have They Been Effective?西班牙的健康影响评估:它们是否有效?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082959.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-Promoting Food Pricing Policies and Decision-Making in Very Remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Stores in Australia.促进健康食品定价政策与澳大利亚偏远原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区商店的决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 19;15(12):2908. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122908.
2
Factors affecting evidence-use in food policy-making processes in health and agriculture in Fiji.影响斐济健康与农业领域食品政策制定过程中证据使用的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3944-6.
3
Perspectives of Fijian Policymakers on the Obesity Prevention Policy Landscape.斐济政策制定者对肥胖预防政策格局的看法。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:926159. doi: 10.1155/2015/926159. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Aligning food-processing policies to promote healthier fat consumption in India.调整食品加工政策以促进印度更健康的脂肪消费。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):595-605. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat094. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
Reformulating partially hydrogenated vegetable oils to maximise health gains in India: is it feasible and will it meet consumer demand?将部分氢化植物油重新配方以最大限度地提高印度的健康收益:这是否可行,是否符合消费者需求?
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 5;13:1139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1139.
6
Perceived impact and feasibility of strategies to improve access to healthy foods in Washington State, USA.美国华盛顿州改善健康食品可及性策略的感知影响和可行性。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2178-87. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002085. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Developing national obesity policy in middle-income countries: a case study from North Africa.中等收入国家制定国家肥胖政策:来自北非的一个案例研究
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Dec;28(8):858-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs125. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
8
Feasibility of multi-sector policy measures that create activity-friendly environments for children: results of a Delphi study.多部门政策措施创造有利于儿童活动的环境的可行性:德尔菲研究的结果。
Implement Sci. 2011 Dec 15;6:128. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-128.

本文引用的文献

1
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.消除一代人之间的差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.
2
HIA forecast: cloudy with sunny spells later?HIA预测:随后局部多云转晴?
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Oct;18(5):436-8; discussion 438-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn086.
3
Problem and solution trees: a practical approach for identifying potential interventions to improve population nutrition.问题与解决方案树:一种识别潜在干预措施以改善人群营养状况的实用方法。
Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):345-53. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan027. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
4
Health metrics and evaluation: strengthening the science.健康指标与评估:强化科学
Lancet. 2008 Apr 5;371(9619):1191-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60526-7.
5
Scaling up interventions for chronic disease prevention: the evidence.扩大慢性病预防干预措施:证据
Lancet. 2007 Dec 8;370(9603):1939-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61697-3.
6
Validity of predictions in health impact assessment.健康影响评估中预测的有效性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Apr;61(4):362-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.047480.
7
Methodology for obtaining stakeholder assessments of obesity policy options in the PorGrow project.在PorGrow项目中获取利益相关者对肥胖政策选项评估的方法。
Obes Rev. 2007 May;8 Suppl 2:17-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00355.x.
8
Overcoming policy cacophony on obesity: an ecological public health framework for policymakers.克服肥胖问题上的政策杂音:为政策制定者构建的生态公共卫生框架
Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8 Suppl 1:165-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00338.x.
9
Health impact assessment: a tool to help policy makers understand health beyond health care.健康影响评估:一种帮助政策制定者超越医疗保健范畴理解健康的工具。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:393-412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.083006.131942.
10
A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project.一种评估儿童和青少年肥胖干预措施健康效益的新方法:肥胖症项目中的成本效益评估
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Oct;30(10):1463-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803469.