Stirling A, Lobstein T, Millstone E
SPRU--Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
Obes Rev. 2007 May;8 Suppl 2:17-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00355.x.
The Policy Options for Responding to the Growing Challenge of Obesity Research Project (PorGrow) study provided a unique opportunity to develop a large-scale application of a semi-quantitative technique for exploring interviewees' views on options to tackle obesity, using multi-criteria mapping. This 'heuristic' approach utilizes the advantages of a structured interviews framework by predefining a set of options for appraisal, while leaving interviewees free to select their own criteria for making their judgements. Additional information can be gleaned from the interview transcripts and related materials to set the appraisals in their policy context, and allowing interviewees to express their views on the options presented and their own appraisals. The PorGrow study team agreed a predefined set of 20 options for appraisal, and interviewed sets of stakeholders representing more than 20 aspects of policy development in each of the nine participating countries. The details of the methodology adopted are set out in this paper.
应对肥胖研究项目日益增长的挑战的政策选项(PorGrow)研究提供了一个独特的机会,可利用多标准映射法大规模应用一种半定量技术,以探究受访者对解决肥胖问题的选项的看法。这种“启发式”方法利用结构化访谈框架的优势,预先定义一组待评估的选项,同时让受访者自由选择自己进行判断的标准。可以从访谈记录和相关材料中收集更多信息,以便将评估置于政策背景中,并让受访者就所提出的选项及其自身评估表达看法。PorGrow研究团队商定了一组预先定义的20个待评估选项,并对代表九个参与国政策制定20多个方面的利益相关者群体进行了访谈。本文阐述了所采用方法的详细情况。