• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙的健康影响评估:它们是否有效?

Health Impact Assessments in Spain: Have They Been Effective?

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain.

OPIK-Research Group for Social Determinants of Health and Demographic Change, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082959.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17082959
PMID:32344776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health impact assessment (HIA) has scarcely been developed in Spain, in comparison with other European countries. Moreover, little is known about the effectiveness of HIA, taking into account direct impacts-changes on the decision-making process-as well as indirect impacts or those related to the process outcomes. From this broad perspective of HIA usefulness, the purpose was to assess the effectiveness of five HIAs carried out in Spain at the local level, and the role played by context and process factors on these impacts.

METHODS

We carried out a qualitative study based on 14 interviews to HIAs participants from different sectors. A documentary review and nonparticipant observation techniques were implemented for an in depth understanding.

RESULTS

The direct effectiveness of the HIAs was partial, but they had indirect effectiveness in all cases. The institutional and socio-political context, however, was not favorable to effectiveness. The elements of the process were largely determined by the context, although their influence, mediated by the role of proactive individuals, favored the effectiveness of the HIAs.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessing HIA effectiveness, it is important to take into account a broad perspective on the nature of impacts and those factors influencing direct and indirect effectiveness. In Spain, the institutional and sociopolitical context was less favorable to HIA effectiveness than process-related factors. In order to implement the Health in All Policies strategy, will be necessary to improve context-related factors, such as institutional facilitators for HIA and democratic quality.

摘要

背景

与其他欧洲国家相比,健康影响评估(HIA)在西班牙的发展甚少。此外,考虑到直接影响(决策过程的变化)以及间接影响或与过程结果相关的影响,HIA 的有效性知之甚少。从 HIA 有用性的这个广泛角度来看,目的是评估在地方一级进行的五项 HIA 的有效性,以及背景和过程因素对这些影响的作用。

方法

我们进行了一项基于对来自不同领域的 HIA 参与者的 14 次访谈的定性研究。为了深入了解情况,我们采用了文献回顾和非参与观察技术。

结果

HIA 的直接效果是局部的,但在所有情况下都具有间接效果。然而,制度和社会政治背景不利于有效性。尽管通过积极主动的个人的作用来介导,但过程要素在很大程度上取决于背景,有利于 HIA 的有效性。

结论

在评估 HIA 的有效性时,重要的是要考虑到影响的性质和影响直接和间接有效性的因素的广泛观点。在西班牙,制度和社会政治背景不如与过程相关的因素有利于 HIA 的有效性。为了实施“所有政策皆健康”战略,有必要改善与制度相关的因素,例如 HIA 的机构促进因素和民主质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e5f/7216190/3fc4394cb6f5/ijerph-17-02959-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e5f/7216190/3fc4394cb6f5/ijerph-17-02959-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e5f/7216190/3fc4394cb6f5/ijerph-17-02959-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Impact Assessments in Spain: Have They Been Effective?西班牙的健康影响评估:它们是否有效?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082959.
2
The effectiveness of health impact assessment in influencing decision-making in Australia and New Zealand 2005-2009.2005-2009 年,健康影响评估在影响澳大利亚和新西兰决策方面的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 17;13:1188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1188.
3
Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments: A Synthesis of Data From Five Impact Evaluation Reports.健康影响评估的有效性:来自五份影响评估报告的数据综合
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 30;13:E84. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150559.
4
What makes health impact assessments successful? Factors contributing to effectiveness in Australia and New Zealand.是什么让健康影响评估取得成功?澳大利亚和新西兰影响其有效性的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 3;15:1009. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2319-8.
5
Framework for Participatory Quantitative Health Impact Assessment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.参与式定量健康影响评估在中低收入国家的框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207688.
6
Health impact assessment of an urban regeneration project: opportunities and challenges in the context of a southern European city.城市再生项目的健康影响评估:南欧城市背景下的机遇与挑战。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):950-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.091256. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
7
Systematic Literature Review of Health Impact Assessments in Low and Middle-Income Countries.系统文献综述:中低收入国家的健康影响评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 6;16(11):2018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112018.
8
Evaluation of the effects of health impact assessment practice at the local level in Monteregie.蒙特利尔地区地方层面健康影响评估实践效果评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jan 27;14:7. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0076-5.
9
Avenues of Influence: the Relationship between Health Impact Assessment and Determinants of Health and Health Equity.影响途径:健康影响评估与健康决定因素和健康公平性的关系。
J Urban Health. 2018 Oct;95(5):754-764. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0263-5.
10
An evaluation of health impact assessments in the United States, 2011-2014.2011 - 2014年美国健康影响评估情况评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Feb 19;12:E23. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140376.

引用本文的文献

1
Routemap for health impact assessment implementation: scoping review using the consolidated framework for implementation research.健康影响评估实施路线图:使用实施研究综合框架的范围综述
Health Promot Int. 2025 May 13;40(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf080.
2
Optimizing emergency response systems in urban health crises: A project management approach to public health preparedness and response.优化城市卫生危机中的应急系统:一种公共卫生防范与应对的项目管理方法。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 17;104(3):e41279. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041279.
3
A New Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Health Impact Assessment: Capitalising on a French Case Study with the Literature in Evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.英国的健康公平:十年后的《马尔莫特审查报告》
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m693.
2
A scoping review of the implementation of health in all policies at the local level.地方层面实施全健康政策的范围综述
Health Policy. 2018 Mar;122(3):284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
Social determinants of health and local government: understanding and uptake of ideas in two Australian states.健康的社会决定因素与地方政府:对澳大利亚两个州相关理念的理解和采纳。
一个用于监测和评估健康影响评估的新框架:利用法国案例研究和评估文献。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;21(9):1240. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091240.
4
Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review.高收入国家的人口健康和减少健康不平等的跨部门合作治理:一项基于复杂性理论的系统评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2780-2792. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6550. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Apr;41(2):204-209. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12584. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
4
Urban regeneration as population health intervention: a health impact assessment in the Bay of Pasaia (Spain).城市更新作为人口健康干预措施:西班牙帕萨亚湾的健康影响评估
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Sep 15;15(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0424-7.
5
Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments: A Synthesis of Data From Five Impact Evaluation Reports.健康影响评估的有效性:来自五份影响评估报告的数据综合
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 30;13:E84. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150559.
6
What makes health impact assessments successful? Factors contributing to effectiveness in Australia and New Zealand.是什么让健康影响评估取得成功?澳大利亚和新西兰影响其有效性的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 3;15:1009. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2319-8.
7
European Healthy Cities come to terms with health network governance.欧洲健康城市着手处理健康网络治理问题。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30 Suppl 1:i32-i44. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav040.
8
Health impact assessment: improving its effectiveness in the enhancement of health and well-being.健康影响评估:提高其在增进健康和福祉方面的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 3;12(4):3847-52. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120403847.
9
An evaluation of health impact assessments in the United States, 2011-2014.2011 - 2014年美国健康影响评估情况评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Feb 19;12:E23. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140376.
10
[Health impact assessment of regeneration projects in Pasaia Bay (Spain): perceptions of the affected population].[西班牙帕萨亚湾再生项目的健康影响评估:受影响人群的看法]
Gac Sanit. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):442-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Aug 6.