• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症、护理目标与人格:一项关于替代决策者的信念和价值观的研究。

Dementia, goals of care, and personhood: a study of surrogate decision makers' beliefs and values.

作者信息

Kaldjian Lauris C, Shinkunas Laura A, Bern-Klug Mercedes, Schultz Susan K

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Sep;27(6):387-97. doi: 10.1177/1049909109358660. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1177/1049909109358660
PMID:20167835
Abstract

Surrogate decision makers for persons with advanced dementia play a key role in making decisions about medical treatments for their loved ones. We conducted in-depth interviews of 20 surrogates to examine their goals of care preferences and beliefs about personhood. All surrogates believed the goal of comfort was important, and 30.0% believed that curing physical problems was important. Significant proportions of surrogates acknowledged dementia-related changes in patients' ability to reason, communicate, and relate to others. Qualitative findings demonstrated diverse beliefs regarding the impact of dementia on factors related to personhood, for example, dignity, respect from others, and having a life worth living. In conclusion, the surrogates we interviewed expressed diverse preferences regarding goals of care and diverse assessments about the impact of dementia on personhood.

摘要

晚期痴呆症患者的替代决策者在为其亲人做出医疗治疗决策方面发挥着关键作用。我们对20名替代决策者进行了深入访谈,以研究他们的护理偏好目标以及对人格的看法。所有替代决策者都认为舒适的目标很重要,30.0%的人认为治愈身体问题很重要。相当比例的替代决策者承认患者在推理、沟通和与他人交往能力方面与痴呆症相关的变化。定性研究结果表明,对于痴呆症对与人格相关因素(如尊严、他人的尊重以及有价值的生活)的影响,存在不同的看法。总之,我们采访的替代决策者在护理目标方面表达了不同的偏好,对痴呆症对人格的影响也有不同的评估。

相似文献

1
Dementia, goals of care, and personhood: a study of surrogate decision makers' beliefs and values.痴呆症、护理目标与人格:一项关于替代决策者的信念和价值观的研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Sep;27(6):387-97. doi: 10.1177/1049909109358660. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
2
Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.超越替代判断:代理人如何进行临终决策。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00911.x.
3
Family surrogate decision making at the end of life: seeing them through with care and respect.临终时的家庭替代决策:悉心且尊重地陪伴他们度过。
Qual Health Res. 2004 Feb;14(2):204-25. doi: 10.1177/1049732303260501.
4
A voice for the dying.为垂死者发声。
Clin Nurs Res. 2004 Nov;13(4):326-42. doi: 10.1177/1054773804267725.
5
Surrogate decision making for patients with end-stage dementia.终末期痴呆患者的代理决策。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;27(10):1045-52. doi: 10.1002/gps.2820. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
6
A prospective study of primary surrogate decision makers' knowledge of intensive care.一项关于初级替代决策者重症监护知识的前瞻性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2008 May;36(5):1633-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a0784.
7
Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia.医生、护士及亲属对患有痴呆症的疗养院患者临终决策的态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.016. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
8
The process used by surrogate decision makers to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining measures in an intensive care environment.在重症监护环境中,替代决策者用以 withhold 和 withdraw 维持生命措施的过程。 (注:这里“withhold”和“withdraw”在医学语境较难准确翻译,可理解为“停止给予”和“撤销”等意思,但按要求保留英文未完全翻译)
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Mar;34(2):331-9. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.331-339.
9
Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: can surrogates accurately predict patients' preferences?临终决策中患者与代理人的分歧:代理人能否准确预测患者的偏好?
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):524-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08315244. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
10
Surrogate decision making for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者的替代决策制定
J Trauma Nurs. 2011 Oct-Dec;18(4):204-12. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0b013e31823a453a.

引用本文的文献

1
Social networks, social capital and end-of-life care for people with dementia: a realist review.社交网络、社会资本与痴呆患者的临终关怀:一项现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 9;9(12):e030703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030703.
2
Outcomes of Patients With Syncope and Suspected Dementia.晕厥与疑似痴呆患者的预后。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(8):880-890. doi: 10.1111/acem.13414. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
3
Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期痴呆症护理目标干预的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.
4
Ethical frameworks for surrogates' end-of-life planning experiences.代孕者临终规划经历的伦理框架。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Feb;24(1):46-69. doi: 10.1177/0969733016638145. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
Development and testing of a decision aid on goals of care for advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症护理目标决策辅助工具的开发与测试
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Apr;15(4):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.020. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
6
Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.为住院老年人做决策:家庭代理人考虑的伦理因素。
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):125-34.