Fritsch Jenna, Petronio Sandra, Helft Paul R, Torke Alexia M
Indiana University School of Medicine,Indianapolis, Indiana USA.
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):125-34.
Hospitalized older adults frequently have impaired cognition and must rely on surrogates to make major medical decisions. Ethical standards for surrogate decision making are well delineated, but little is known about what factors surrogates actually consider when making decisions.
To determine factors surrogate decision makers consider when making major medical decisions for hospitalized older adults, and whether or not they adhere to established ethical standards.
Semi-structured interview study of the experience and process of decision making.
A public safety-net hospital and a tertiary referral hospital in a large city in the Midwest United States.
The study included 35 surrogates with a recent decision-making experience for an inpatient aged 65 or older.
The key factors that surrogates considered when making decisions. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using the grounded theory method of qualitative analysis.
Surrogates considered patient-centered factors and surrogate-centered factors. Patient-centered factors included: (1) respecting the patient's input, (2) using past knowledge of the patient to infer the patient's wishes, and (3) considering what is in the patient's best interests. Some surrogates expressed a desire for more information about the patient's prior wishes. Surrogate-centered factors included: (1) surrogate's wishes as a guide, (2) surrogate's religious beliefs and/or spirituality, (3) surrogate's interests, and (4) family consensus.
Our study indicates that surrogate decision making is more complex than the standard ethical models, which are limited to considerations of the patient's autonomy and beneficence. Because surrogates also imagine what they would want under the circumstances and consider their own needs and preferences, models of surrogate decision making must account for these additional considerations. Surrogates' desire for more information about patients' preferences suggests a need for greater advance care planning.
住院的老年人经常存在认知障碍,必须依靠代理人来做出重大医疗决策。代理人决策的伦理标准已明确界定,但对于代理人在做决策时实际考虑哪些因素却知之甚少。
确定代理人在为住院老年人做出重大医疗决策时所考虑的因素,以及他们是否遵循既定的伦理标准。
关于决策经验和过程的半结构化访谈研究。
美国中西部一个大城市的一家公共安全网医院和一家三级转诊医院。
该研究纳入了35名近期有过为65岁及以上住院患者做决策经历的代理人。
代理人在做决策时考虑的关键因素。访谈记录采用定性分析的扎根理论方法进行编码和分析。
代理人考虑了以患者为中心的因素和以代理人为中心的因素。以患者为中心的因素包括:(1)尊重患者的意见,(2)利用对患者过去的了解来推断患者的意愿,以及(3)考虑什么对患者最有利。一些代理人表示希望获得更多关于患者先前意愿的信息。以代理人为中心的因素包括:(1)以代理人的意愿为指导,(2)代理人的宗教信仰和/或精神信仰,(3)代理人的利益,以及(4)家庭共识。
我们的研究表明,代理人决策比标准伦理模型更为复杂,后者仅限于考虑患者的自主性和受益。由于代理人还会设想自己在这种情况下会想要什么,并考虑自己的需求和偏好,因此代理人决策模型必须考虑这些额外因素。代理人对更多关于患者偏好信息的渴望表明需要加强预先护理规划。