相似文献
1
The value of arthroplasty registry data.
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):8-9. doi: 10.3109/17453671003667184.
2
[The inclusion of data documentation in the endoprosthesis registry. An effective instrument for quality assurance in endoprosthetics].
Chirurg. 1997 Nov;68(11):Suppl 347-8.
3
Statistical analysis of arthroplasty register data.
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):10-4. doi: 10.3109/17453671003587168.
4
[National registries for shoulder and elbow arthroplasties are established].
Lakartidningen. 1999 Jul 28;96(30-31):3338.
5
A new universal, standardized implant database for product identification: a unique tool for arthroplasty registries.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jul;135(7):919-26. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2238-2. Epub 2015 May 10.
6
Shortcomings of the National Joint Registry: a survey of consultants' views.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Mar;87(2):109-12; discussion 112. doi: 10.1308/1478708051603.
7
Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. I. Introduction and background.
Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):253-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588862.
8
The importance of outcome measurement in orthopaedics.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3409-11. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3224-z. Epub 2013 Aug 10.
9
Osteoarthritis: Virtual joint replacement as an outcome measure in OA.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Mar 30;8(4):187-8. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.34.
10
Thoughts on the orthopedic guidelines and joint replacement registry.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Jun;42(6):257-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Developing a Classification of Spinal Medical Devices: Has the Time Come? Review of the Literature and a Proposal for Spine Registries.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;12(8):853. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080853.
2
Arthroplasty registries at a glance: an initiative of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) to facilitate access, understanding, and reporting of registry data from an international perspective.
Acta Orthop. 2025 Jan 24;96:116-126. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42706.
3
Long-term survivorship and results in lower limb arthroplasty: a registry-based comparison study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 19;24(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06398-7.
4
Identification of implant outliers in joint replacement registries.
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Jan 27;8(1):11-17. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0058.
5
Total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) and the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA): comparison of patient and procedure characteristics in 475,685 cases.
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1843875. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Are Lipped Polyethylene Liners Associated with Increased Revision Rates in Patients with Uncemented Acetabular Components? An Observational Cohort Study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):581-589. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001039.
7
An international comparison of THA patients, implants, techniques, and survivorship in Sweden, Australia, and the United States.
Acta Orthop. 2019 Apr;90(2):148-152. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1574395. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
An optimum prosthesis combination of low-risk total knee arthroplasty options in all five primary categories of design results in a 60% reduction in revision risk: a registry analysis of 482,373 prostheses.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1418-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5115-z. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Editorial Comment: 6th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1164-1165. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000534688.76623.00.
10
Meta-analysis of individual registry results enhances international registry collaboration.
Acta Orthop. 2018 Aug;89(4):369-373. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1454383. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
Zotero 插件