• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节成形术登记数据的统计分析。

Statistical analysis of arthroplasty register data.

机构信息

Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedics, Lund University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):10-4. doi: 10.3109/17453671003587168.

DOI:10.3109/17453671003587168
PMID:20175657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2856199/
Abstract

Data from arthroplasty registers are often analyzed using survival methods. Several methodological problems exist, for example relating to competing events, non-random censoring, non-proportional hazards and dependent observations. League tables and ranking of specific survival results leds to further methodological difficulties. Most of these problems are, however, well known and a number of methods for dealing successfully with the problems have been developed. These methods are usually accessible in commercially available statistical software packages. The statistical analysis and reporting of data from arthroplasty registers can thus be improved. Development of arthroplasty register guidelines for statistical analysis could play an important role in making these registers even more useful.

摘要

关节置换术注册处的数据通常使用生存分析法进行分析。存在一些方法学问题,例如与竞争事件、非随机删失、非比例风险和相关观测有关的问题。联赛排名和特定生存结果的排名导致了进一步的方法学困难。然而,这些问题大多是已知的,已经开发出了一些成功处理这些问题的方法。这些方法通常在商业上可用的统计软件包中可用。因此,可以改进关节置换术注册处数据的统计分析和报告。制定关节置换术注册处统计分析指南可能在使这些注册处更加有用方面发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/2856199/8dc975fbd4a2/ORT-1745-3674-81-010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/2856199/8dc975fbd4a2/ORT-1745-3674-81-010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/2856199/8dc975fbd4a2/ORT-1745-3674-81-010-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Statistical analysis of arthroplasty register data.关节成形术登记数据的统计分析。
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):10-4. doi: 10.3109/17453671003587168.
2
Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. I. Introduction and background.关节成形术数据的统计分析。一、引言与背景。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):253-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588862.
3
Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. II. Guidelines.关节成形术数据的统计学分析。II. 指南。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):258-67. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588863.
4
Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.挪威关节成形术登记处的登记完整性。
Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):49-56. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045696.
5
[Experiences with the German Endoprosthesis Register].[德国人工关节置换登记系统的经验]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Apr;95(3):203-8.
6
Shortcomings of the National Joint Registry: a survey of consultants' views.国家联合注册中心的不足之处:顾问观点调查
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Mar;87(2):109-12; discussion 112. doi: 10.1308/1478708051603.
7
Joint Registries: a Ptolemaic model of data interpretation?联合注册机构:数据解读的托勒密模型?
Bone Joint J. 2013 Dec;95-B(12):1585-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.33353.
8
A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).斯堪的纳维亚地区注册协作经验:北欧关节置换登记协会(NARA)。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:13-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00951.
9
The International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries: overview and summary.国际骨科学注册机构联盟:概述与总结
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:1-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01125.
10
Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register.国家关节成形术登记成功的关键因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Dec;89(12):1567-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.19409.

引用本文的文献

1
The "true" 1-year incidence of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: validation of an algorithm identifying dislocations in the Danish National Patient Register based on 5,415 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.初次全髋关节置换术后脱位的“真实”1年发生率:基于丹麦髋关节置换登记处5415例患者,对丹麦国家患者登记处中识别脱位的算法进行验证
Acta Orthop. 2024 Jul 17;95:380-385. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41064.
2
Does changes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty practice pattern influence reasons for revision?单髁膝关节置换术实践模式的改变是否会影响翻修原因?
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Dec 4;4(12):923-931. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0096.R1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression.通过加权Cox回归估计平均风险比。
Stat Med. 2009 Aug 30;28(19):2473-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.3623.
2
Health-care quality registers: outcome-orientated ranking of hospitals is unreliable.医疗质量登记册:以结果为导向的医院排名不可靠。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Dec;90(12):1558-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.21172.
3
[Ranking in health care results in wrong conclusions].[医疗保健中的排名会导致错误结论]。
Risk factors for revision due to prosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty based on 62,087 knees in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2020.
基于芬兰关节置换登记处 2014 年至 2020 年的 62087 例全膝关节置换术后因假体关节感染而翻修的风险因素。
Acta Orthop. 2023 May 3;94:215-223. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.12307.
4
Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty due to metastatic bone disease: a retrospective cohort study evaluating the postoperative dislocation risk across different articulating solutions.髋关节置换术后因转移性骨病导致的脱位率:一项回顾性队列研究,评估不同关节解决方案的术后脱位风险。
Acta Orthop. 2023 Mar 6;94:107-114. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.10311.
5
Outcomes of trabecular metal total ankle replacement: a longitudinal observational cohort study of 239 consecutive cases from the Swedish Ankle Registry.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后迟发性出血的危险因素分析:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jul 27;93:689-695. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4387.
6
Optimized medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty outcome: learning from 20 years of propensity score matched registry data.优化的内侧单髁膝关节置换术效果:从 20 年的倾向评分匹配登记数据中学习。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Apr 6;93:390-396. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2265.
7
Higher use of fixed-bearing over mobile-bearing and posterior-stabilized over medial pivot designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers from England and Wales, Australia, Norway, New Zealand, Germany and Switzerland.全膝关节置换术(TKA)中固定轴承相对于活动轴承、后稳定型相对于内侧枢轴型的更高使用率:来自英国和威尔士、澳大利亚、挪威、新西兰、德国和瑞士的全球关节置换登记处的系统比较分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Feb;143(2):1021-1029. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04410-8. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Patient-reported outcome after dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasties: a cross-sectional study derived from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.初次全髋关节置换术后脱位的患者报告结局:来自丹麦髋关节置换登记处的一项横断面研究。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jan 3;93:29-36. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1983973.
9
Risk factors for prosthetic joint infections following total hip arthroplasty based on 33,337 hips in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 2014 to 2018.2014 年至 2018 年芬兰关节置换登记处 33337 髋全髋关节置换术后假体关节感染的危险因素。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Dec;92(6):665-672. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1944529. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease-When Decisions at End-of-Life Really Makes the Difference.转移性骨病的外科治疗——临终决策何时真正产生影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 25;13(11):2581. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112581.
Lakartidningen. 2008;105(35):2313-4.
4
Competing events influence estimated survival probability: when is Kaplan-Meier analysis appropriate?竞争事件会影响估计的生存概率:Kaplan-Meier分析何时适用?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Sep;462:229-33. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180986753.
5
Variation in outcome and ranking of hospitals: an analysis from the Swedish knee arthroplasty register.医院治疗结果及排名的差异:来自瑞典膝关节置换登记处的分析
Acta Orthop. 2006 Jun;77(3):487-93. doi: 10.1080/17453670610046442.
6
How many patients? How many limbs? Analysis of patients or limbs in the orthopaedic literature: a systematic review.多少患者?多少肢体?骨科文献中患者或肢体的分析:一项系统评价。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):41-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00272.
7
Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function.基于累积发病率函数伪值的竞争风险数据回归建模
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):223-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.031209.x.
8
Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients.来自47355名患者的55782例初次髋关节置换术生存分析中的依赖性问题。
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 30;23(20):3227-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.1905.
9
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.在分析生存情况时最大限度地利用生命表法。
J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699-712. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7.
10
No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.分析膝关节假体翻修风险时不存在忽略双侧性的偏差:对瑞典国家膝关节置换登记处44590例患者的55298个膝关节假体的基于人群的样本进行分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 Feb 5;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-1.