• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ROSE(急诊科晕厥风险分层研究)。

The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.049.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.049
PMID:20170806
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical decision rule (CDR) to predict 1-month serious outcome and all-cause death in patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department.

BACKGROUND

Syncope is a common, potentially serious condition accounting for many hospital admissions.

METHODS

This was a single center, prospective, observational study of adults presenting to the emergency department with syncope. A CDR was devised from 550 patients in a derivation cohort and tested in a validation cohort of a further 550 patients.

RESULTS

One-month serious outcome or all-cause death occurred in 40 (7.3%) patients in the derivation cohort. Independent predictors were brain natriuretic peptide concentration > or =300 pg/ml (odds ratio [OR]: 7.3), positive fecal occult blood (OR: 13.2), hemoglobin < or =90 g/l (OR: 6.7), oxygen saturation < or =94% (OR: 3.0), and Q-wave on the presenting electrocardiogram (OR: 2.8). One-month serious outcome or all-cause death occurred in 39 (7.1%) patients in the validation cohort. The ROSE (Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department) rule had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.2% and 65.5%, respectively, and a negative predictive value of 98.5%. An elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration alone was a major predictor of serious cardiovascular outcomes (8 of 22 events, 36%) and all-cause deaths (8 of 9 deaths, 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ROSE rule has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value in the identification of high-risk patients with syncope. As a component, BNP seems to be a major predictor of serious cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death. The ROSE rule and BNP measurement might be valuable risk stratification tools in patients with emergency presentations of syncope and should now be subjected to external validation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在制定并验证一种临床决策规则(CDR),以预测因晕厥就诊于急诊科的患者 1 个月内的严重结局和全因死亡。

背景

晕厥是一种常见的潜在严重疾病,可导致许多患者住院。

方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究,纳入了因晕厥就诊于急诊科的成年患者。从 550 例患者的推导队列中制定了 CDR,并在进一步的 550 例患者的验证队列中进行了测试。

结果

推导队列中,40 例(7.3%)患者在 1 个月内出现严重结局或全因死亡。独立预测因素为脑钠肽浓度> =300 pg/ml(优势比[OR]:7.3)、粪便潜血阳性(OR:13.2)、血红蛋白< =90 g/l(OR:6.7)、氧饱和度< =94%(OR:3.0)和入院时心电图 Q 波(OR:2.8)。验证队列中,有 39 例(7.1%)患者在 1 个月内出现严重结局或全因死亡。ROSE(急诊科晕厥风险分层)规则的敏感性和特异性分别为 87.2%和 65.5%,阴性预测值为 98.5%。单独升高的 B 型利钠肽(BNP)浓度是严重心血管结局(8 例事件,36%)和全因死亡(9 例死亡,89%)的主要预测因素。

结论

ROSE 规则在识别高危晕厥患者方面具有较高的敏感性和阴性预测值。作为一个组成部分,BNP 似乎是严重心血管结局和全因死亡的主要预测因素。ROSE 规则和 BNP 测量可能是急诊晕厥患者有价值的风险分层工具,现在应进行外部验证。

相似文献

1
The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study.ROSE(急诊科晕厥风险分层研究)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.049.
2
One-year prognosis after syncope and the failure of the ROSE decision instrument to predict one-year adverse events.晕厥后 1 年预后及 ROSE 决策工具预测 1 年不良事件失败。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;58(3):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.021. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
3
The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines.急诊科晕厥风险分层(ROSE)试点研究:现有晕厥指南的比较
Emerg Med J. 2007 Apr;24(4):270-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.042739.
4
Role of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in risk stratification of adult syncope.脑钠肽(BNP)在成人晕厥风险分层中的作用。
Emerg Med J. 2007 Nov;24(11):769-73. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.048413.
5
Utility of brain natriuretic peptide assay as a predictor of short term outcomes in patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department.脑钠肽检测在急诊科晕厥患者短期预后预测中的应用价值
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Jun;6(3):234-40. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.03.06.
6
Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.用于预测具有短期严重后果患者的旧金山晕厥规则的推导。
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;43(2):224-32. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00823-0.
7
Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.未能在独立的急诊科人群中验证旧金山晕厥规则。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;52(2):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.007. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
8
Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope.急诊科晕厥患者心电图监测时间。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1396-1406. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036088.
9
Do High-sensitivity Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Predict Death or Serious Cardiac Outcomes After Syncope?高敏肌钙蛋白和利钠肽能否预测晕厥后死亡或严重心脏结局?
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May;26(5):528-538. doi: 10.1111/acem.13709. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
10
A New Feasible Syncope Risk Score Appropriate for Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study.一种适用于急诊科的新型可行晕厥风险评分:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Sep;17(3):151-154. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000146.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of syncope short-term outcomes prediction by machine learning models in an Italian emergency department cohort.意大利急诊科队列中机器学习模型对晕厥短期结局预测的验证
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-04034-x.
2
Quantitative Analysis of Diagnostic Reasoning Using Initial Electronic Medical Records.使用初始电子病历对诊断推理进行定量分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;15(12):1561. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121561.
3
Risk-stratification tools for emergency department patients with syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct evidence for SAEM GRACE.
急诊科晕厥患者的风险分层工具:SAEM GRACE直接证据的系统评价与荟萃分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;32(1):72-86. doi: 10.1111/acem.15041. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
4
Interhospital variability in hospital admissions for patients with low-risk syncope presenting to the emergency department.急诊科收治的低风险晕厥患者的院间差异。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jun 18;5(7):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.006. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Development and Validation of a Novel Predictive Model for the Early Differentiation of Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Syncope.一种用于心脏性和非心脏性晕厥早期鉴别诊断的新型预测模型的开发与验证
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Mar 6;17:841-853. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S454521. eCollection 2024.
6
A Hybrid Model for 30-Day Syncope Prognosis Prediction in the Emergency Department.急诊科30天晕厥预后预测的混合模型
J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 20;14(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010004.
7
Application of five risk stratification tools for syncope in older adults.老年人晕厥的五种风险分层工具的应用。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231220894. doi: 10.1177/03000605231220894.
8
Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review.在急救医疗服务和急诊部门中用于晕厥患者的风险分层工具:范围综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 18;31(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z.
9
Implementation of the Canadian syncope pathway: a pilot non-randomized stepped wedge trial.加拿大晕厥诊疗路径的实施:一项非随机阶梯楔形试验试点研究
CJEM. 2023 Oct;25(10):808-817. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00570-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
10
Comparison of syncope risk scores in predicting the prognosis of patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope.比较晕厥风险评分在预测因晕厥就诊于急诊科的患者预后中的作用。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2727-2734. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03395-6. Epub 2023 May 12.