• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射状腓骨瓣中种植体的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of implants in radiated fibula flaps.

作者信息

Salinas Thomas J, Desa Valmont P, Katsnelson Alexander, Miloro Michael

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;68(3):524-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.104.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.104
PMID:20171471
Abstract

PURPOSE

The success of osseointegrated implants in the radiated fibula flap used for mandibular reconstruction is variable, and there are few long-term data available in the literature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate implant success in radiated fibula flaps and the native mandible after ablative tumor surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 44 patients who underwent resection and reconstruction of the mandible from 1994 to 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 206 implants were placed; 144 were placed in a fibula flap, and 92 were placed in the native mandible. Before implant placement, 22 patients (50%) received adjuvant tumoricidal doses of radiation therapy (>6,000 cGy). All patients who received radiation received a standard regimen of 20 preoperative and 10 postoperative hyperbaric oxygen treatments. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 108 months (mean, 41.1 months). Comparisons were made between groups regarding long-term implant success based on several variables.

RESULTS

Implants were considered to be successful if there was no radiographic evidence of peri-implant bone loss and if they were clinically osseointegrated. Of 206 implants, 31 failed, with an overall success rate of 85%. The success rate of implants placed in fibula flaps was 82.4%, and the success rate in native mandibles was 88%. Most of the failures in the fibula (90%) occurred within the first 6 months after implant placement, whereas most of the failures in the mandible occurred after 6 months. The cumulative survival rate was 91.9%, and there was no difference in survival between implants placed in the fibula versus the native mandible or depending on whether the patient received radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Acceptable long-term implant success rates may be achieved in the radiated mandible with vascularized fibula flap reconstruction.

摘要

目的

用于下颌骨重建的带血管蒂腓骨瓣中骨整合种植体的成功率各不相同,且文献中几乎没有长期数据。本研究的目的是评估在肿瘤切除术后的带血管蒂腓骨瓣及天然下颌骨中种植体的成功率。

材料与方法

回顾性分析1994年至2006年期间44例行下颌骨切除及重建手术患者的病历。共植入206枚种植体;144枚植入腓骨瓣,92枚植入天然下颌骨。在植入种植体前,22例患者(50%)接受了辅助性肿瘤杀伤剂量的放射治疗(>6000 cGy)。所有接受放疗的患者均接受了标准方案的术前20次和术后10次高压氧治疗。随访期为4至108个月(平均41.1个月)。基于多个变量对各亚组间的长期种植体成功率进行比较。

结果

若影像学检查未发现种植体周围骨丢失且临床检查种植体实现骨整合,则认为种植成功。206枚种植体中,31枚失败,总体成功率为85%。植入腓骨瓣的种植体成功率为82.4%,天然下颌骨中的成功率为88%。腓骨瓣中大多数失败(90%)发生在种植体植入后的前6个月,而下颌骨中的大多数失败发生在6个月后。累积生存率为91.9%,植入腓骨瓣与天然下颌骨的种植体生存率无差异,也与患者是否接受放射治疗无关。

结论

采用带血管蒂腓骨瓣重建放疗后的下颌骨可获得可接受的长期种植体成功率。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of implants in radiated fibula flaps.放射状腓骨瓣中种植体的临床评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;68(3):524-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.104.
2
Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of fibula free-flap reconstructed mandibles: a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center review of prognostic factors and implant outcomes.游离腓骨瓣重建下颌骨的种植修复:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心对预后因素和种植结果的回顾
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):738-46.
3
Immediate loading of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps: a clinical report on 2 consecutive patients.即刻种植于血管化游离腓骨瓣中的牙种植体:2例连续病例的临床报告
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):906-12.
4
Life table analysis and clinical evaluation of oral implants supporting prostheses after resection of malignant tumors.恶性肿瘤切除术后口腔种植支持修复体的生命表分析及临床评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Sep-Oct;14(5):673-80.
5
Evaluation of osseointegration of endosseous implants in radiated, vascularized fibula flaps to the mandible: a pilot study.评估辐射后的带血管腓骨瓣与下颌骨内种植体的骨结合:一项初步研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Jun;53(6):640-4; discussion 644-5. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90158-2.
6
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Osseointegrated Dental Implantation of Fibula Free Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction.评估游离腓骨瓣在下颌骨重建中进行骨整合种植牙的临床效果。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 May 1;18(3):201-6. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2271.
7
Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on the functional result of implants placed during ablative surgery for oral cancer.术后放疗对口腔癌根治性手术中植入物功能结果的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;35(9):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.007. Epub 2006 May 11.
8
[Long-term complications of radiotherapy after mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bnoe graft].[带血管蒂骨移植下颌骨重建术后放疗的远期并发症]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000;Suppl 125:109S-111S.
9
A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.一项对使用Le Fort I型截骨术和植入骨移植重建严重吸收的上颌骨后植入的两种不同种植体表面进行的长期回顾性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):911-8.
10
Oral rehabilitation after treatment for head and neck malignancy.头颈部恶性肿瘤治疗后的口腔修复
Head Neck. 2005 Jun;27(6):459-70. doi: 10.1002/hed.20176.

引用本文的文献

1
Implant-Supported Oral Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A 20-Year Single-Center Study (2005-2024).头颈部癌症患者的种植体支持式口腔修复:一项为期20年的单中心研究(2005 - 2024年)
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5435. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155435.
2
Meta-analysis of the survival rate and postoperative infection rate of primary and secondary implants after vascularized fibula transplantation for reconstruction of jaw defects.吻合血管腓骨移植重建颌骨缺损后一期和二期种植体的存活率和术后感染率的荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Dec 18;9(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00514-x.
3
Bone Tissue Engineering (BTE) of the Craniofacial Skeleton, Part I: Evolution and Optimization of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Repair of Defects.
颅颌面骨组织工程(BTE),第一部分:用于修复缺损的 3D 打印支架的演变和优化。
J Craniofac Surg. 2023 Oct 1;34(7):2016-2025. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009593. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
What Is the Success of Implants Placed in Fibula Flap? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腓骨瓣植入的成功率如何?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2022 Mar 31;13(1):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13103. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
5
Risk factor analysis of dental implants in patients with irradiated head and neck cancer.头颈部放疗后患者行牙种植术的风险因素分析。
Head Neck. 2022 Aug;44(8):1816-1824. doi: 10.1002/hed.27080. Epub 2022 May 12.
6
Surgical Margins After Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.计算机辅助下颌骨重建术后的手术切缘:一项回顾性研究
Front Oral Health. 2022 Jan 13;2:806477. doi: 10.3389/froh.2021.806477. eCollection 2021.
7
Clinical long-term and patient-reported outcomes of dental implants in oral cancer patients.口腔癌患者种植体的临床长期和患者报告结局。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 13;7(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00373-4.
8
Dental Implant Survival in Vascularized Bone Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管化骨瓣中牙种植体的存活率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Sep;146(3):637-648. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007077.
9
Fibular osteofasciocutaneous flap in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: technical aspects in oral malignancies.计算机辅助下颌骨重建中的腓骨骨筋膜皮瓣:口腔恶性肿瘤的技术要点
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016 Dec;36(6):469-478. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1282.
10
Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview.下颌骨重建:概述
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Dec;15(4):425-441. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5. Epub 2015 Apr 19.