Ziegler Christoph M, Wiechnik Jan, Mühling Joachim
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, St Olavs University Hospital, Norwegian University for Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;68(3):622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.049.
PURPOSE: A number of reports have shown a direct analgesic effect of opioids by way of the peripheral receptors. Nevertheless, only a very few studies have reported using opioids in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and nearly all of them were connected to surgical patient groups. The present study was designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of repeated intra-articular morphine applications compared with a local anesthetic and saline solution in the management of TMJ pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 48 patients with articular pain related to the TMJ were entered in a clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center study. The analgesic effect of repeated intra-articular infiltration with morphine (5 or 10 mg morphine sulfite), bupivacaine 0.5% (Carbostesin; AstraZeneca, London, UK), and isotonic saline solution as a placebo in the TMJ was examined. The efficiency after 3 injections of the same substance with an interval of 48 hours between each application was measured using a pain relief scale, visual analog scale, pain intensity scale, and the potential need for accessory peripheral analgesics (paracetamol). RESULTS: All patients showed, independent of the treatment group, pain relief within 60 minutes after the first injection. Patients with saline and Carbostesin reported almost complete pain recurrence before the second injection. At 1 week after the last and third injection, the 10-mg morphine group still showed a distinct effect, with 16.7% reporting complete (no pain) and 41.7% distinct pain relief. In addition, 33.3% had a poor response and 8.3% had no improvement. None of the other groups reported complete improvement; however, 25% of the patients who received 5 mg morphine had distinct pain relief, and 50% had at least poor pain relief. In the Carbostesin group, distinct improvement was reported by 8.3%, with a poor response in 41.7%, and no effect in the remaining 50%. Patients treated with saline had a poor response in 16.7%, but most (83.3%) reported no improvement 1 week after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of the applied substances, initial pain relief can be registered in the TMJ: either from the arthrocentesis effect or at least the placebo effect. Morphine at a dosage of 10 mg showed the best and most long-lasting analgesic efficiency. Morphine, in general (5 and 10 mg), and, with limitations, Carbostesin were more or less efficient for postoperative pain control but without distinct effects in the long term. With regard to our results, we can recommend intra-articular morphine application at a dose of 10 mg for pain management. Carbostesin showed no promising long-term effects.
目的:多项报告显示阿片类药物可通过外周受体产生直接镇痛作用。然而,仅有极少数研究报道过在颞下颌关节(TMJ)使用阿片类药物,且几乎所有研究都与手术患者群体相关。本研究旨在评估与局部麻醉药和生理盐水相比,重复关节内注射吗啡治疗TMJ疼痛的镇痛效果及安全性。 患者与方法:48例与TMJ相关的关节疼痛患者纳入一项临床、前瞻性、随机、双盲、单中心研究。研究了重复关节内注射吗啡(5或10mg亚硫酸吗啡)、0.5%布比卡因(卡波卡因;阿斯利康,英国伦敦)和等渗生理盐水作为安慰剂在TMJ的镇痛效果。在每次注射间隔48小时,注射3次相同物质后,使用疼痛缓解量表、视觉模拟量表、疼痛强度量表以及辅助外周镇痛药(对乙酰氨基酚)的潜在需求来衡量疗效。 结果:所有患者,无论治疗组如何,在首次注射后60分钟内均出现疼痛缓解。注射生理盐水和卡波卡因的患者在第二次注射前几乎完全出现疼痛复发。在最后一次(第三次)注射后1周,10mg吗啡组仍显示出明显效果,16.7%的患者报告完全(无疼痛)缓解,41.7%的患者报告疼痛明显缓解。此外,33.3%的患者反应较差,8.3%的患者无改善。其他组均未报告完全改善;然而,接受5mg吗啡的患者中25%疼痛明显缓解,50%的患者至少疼痛缓解较差。在卡波卡因组,8.3%的患者报告明显改善,41.7%的患者反应较差,其余50%的患者无效果。注射生理盐水治疗的患者中16.7%反应较差,但大多数(83.3%)在治疗后1周报告无改善。 结论:无论使用何种物质,TMJ均可出现初始疼痛缓解:可能源于关节穿刺效果或至少是安慰剂效应。10mg剂量的吗啡显示出最佳且最持久的镇痛效果。一般而言,吗啡(5mg和10mg)以及在一定程度上卡波卡因对术后疼痛控制或多或少有效,但长期效果不明显。基于我们的研究结果,我们推荐10mg剂量的关节内注射吗啡用于疼痛管理。卡波卡因未显示出有前景的长期效果。
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007-6
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018-12
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015-1-30