• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价不同麻醉技术对颞下颌关节关节腔穿刺应用的患者舒适度和影响,比较 Gow-Gates 下颌支阻滞麻醉与耳颞神经阻滞。

Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul 34854, Turkey.

Private Practice, Bursa 16000, Turkey.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2022 Aug 31;2022:4206275. doi: 10.1155/2022/4206275. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/4206275
PMID:36090766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9453085/
Abstract

AIM

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinical situations that are characterized by pain, sound, and irregular movements of the temporomandibular joints. The most common method in the treatment of TMDs is arthrocentesis. This study aims to compare the effect of conventional extraoral auriculotemporal nerve block (ANB) and Gow-Gates (GG) mandibular anesthesia techniques on patient comfort in an arthrocentesis procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed this study on 40 patients who underwent TMJ arthrocentesis with ANB ( = 20) or GG ( = 20) mandibular anesthesia techniques at the Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry between 2016 and 2019. The predictor variable was the type of an anesthesia technique, and the outcome variables included were pain, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and protrusive movement (PM). They were compared at the preoperative period and 3 and 6 month periods. Statistical analysis included means with standard deviations, a one-way ANOVA for continuous data, and the results were evaluated at the significance level of < 0.05.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed between the VAS values, MMO, and PM averages of preoperative, 3 and 6 months of ANB and GG (=0.142, =0.209, and =0.148).

CONCLUSION

Both anesthesia techniques have provided effective results in terms of pain and functional jaw movements in the postoperative period in arthrocentesis treatment.

摘要

目的

颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)是一种以颞下颌关节疼痛、声响和运动异常为特征的临床情况。TMD 的最常见治疗方法是关节腔穿刺术。本研究旨在比较常规的颊部耳颞神经阻滞(ANB)和 Gow-Gates(GG)下颌麻醉技术对关节腔穿刺术中患者舒适度的影响。

材料与方法

我们在 2016 年至 2019 年间,在马尔马拉大学牙科学院对 40 例接受 TMJ 关节腔穿刺术的患者进行了研究,这些患者分别接受了 ANB( = 20)或 GG( = 20)下颌麻醉技术。预测变量是麻醉技术类型,结果变量包括疼痛、最大张口度(MMO)和前伸运动(PM)。这些变量在术前、术后 3 个月和 6 个月进行比较。统计分析包括平均值和标准差、连续数据的单因素方差分析,结果在 < 0.05 的显著性水平进行评估。

结果

ANB 和 GG 的 VAS 值、MMO 和 PM 平均值在术前、术后 3 个月和 6 个月之间均无统计学差异(=0.142、=0.209 和 =0.148)。

结论

在关节腔穿刺治疗中,两种麻醉技术在术后疼痛和功能性下颌运动方面均取得了有效的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c8/9453085/36e0f9723186/PRM2022-4206275.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c8/9453085/36e0f9723186/PRM2022-4206275.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c8/9453085/36e0f9723186/PRM2022-4206275.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block.评价不同麻醉技术对颞下颌关节关节腔穿刺应用的患者舒适度和影响,比较 Gow-Gates 下颌支阻滞麻醉与耳颞神经阻滞。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Aug 31;2022:4206275. doi: 10.1155/2022/4206275. eCollection 2022.
2
Injectable platelet-rich fibrin as treatment for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.注射用富血小板纤维蛋白治疗颞下颌关节骨关节炎的随机对照临床试验。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Jul;50(7):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.不同治疗方法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的等级:一项随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan;48(1):9-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
4
Clinical outcomes of patients with bilateral anterior disc displacement without reduction and erosive change of the temporomandibular joint after performance of unilateral arthrocentesis and stabilisation splint therapy.单侧关节腔穿刺冲洗及稳定夹板治疗后伴双侧前盘移位但无复位和颞下颌关节侵蚀性改变患者的临床转归。
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Mar;47(3):307-312. doi: 10.1111/joor.12897. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
5
The Short-Term Results of the Modified Concentric-Needle Technique for Single-Puncture Arthrocentesis: A Preliminary Study.改良同心针技术单穿刺关节穿刺术的短期疗效:初步研究。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Jun;34(6):717-722. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.06.717.
6
Is Repeated Arthrocentesis Beneficial in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Retrospective Study.反复关节穿刺术对颞下颌关节紊乱病的治疗有益吗:一项回顾性研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;77(7):1359-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.041. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Management of patients with disk displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joint by arthrocentesis alone, plus hyaluronic acid or plus platelet-rich plasma.单纯通过关节穿刺术治疗颞下颌关节不可复性盘移位患者,联合透明质酸或富血小板血浆。
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Jul-Sep;56(3):265-272. doi: 10.17219/dmp/109329.
8
Does the Use of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin After Arthrocentesis for Disc Displacement Without Reduction Improve Clinical Outcomes?关节穿刺后注射富含血小板纤维蛋白治疗未复位椎间盘移位是否能改善临床疗效?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun;81(6):689-697. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
Does the Cannula Diameter Affect Outcomes of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Arthrocentesis?套管直径会影响颞下颌关节(TMJ)关节腔穿刺术的结果吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;80(3):431-436. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.09.015. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
Five-year retrospective evaluation of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis.颞下颌关节关节腔穿刺术的五年回顾性评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;32(3):263-7. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2003.0371.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurological Complications Following Temporomandibular Joint Injections in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Reported Adverse Events.颞下颌关节紊乱病患者颞下颌关节注射后的神经并发症:已报道不良事件的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 15;14(16):5770. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165770.
2
Treatment of temporomandibular joint internal derangement using MESNA injection.使用 MESNA 注射治疗颞下颌关节内紊乱。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 4;24(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04615-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of patients with bilateral anterior disc displacement without reduction and erosive change of the temporomandibular joint after performance of unilateral arthrocentesis and stabilisation splint therapy.单侧关节腔穿刺冲洗及稳定夹板治疗后伴双侧前盘移位但无复位和颞下颌关节侵蚀性改变患者的临床转归。
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Mar;47(3):307-312. doi: 10.1111/joor.12897. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
2
Evaluation of the efficacy of different treatment modalities for painful temporomandibular disorders.评价不同治疗方式治疗颞下颌关节紊乱相关疼痛的疗效。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 May;49(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
3
Clinical and intra-operative factors affecting the outcome of arthrocentesis in disc displacement without reduction: A retrospective study.
影响未复位型盘突关节移位关节腔穿刺术疗效的临床和术中因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Aug;46(8):699-703. doi: 10.1111/joor.12808. Epub 2019 May 12.
4
Comparison of Efficacy of Halstead, Vazirani Akinosi and Gow Gates Techniques for Mandibular Anesthesia.哈尔斯特德法、瓦齐拉尼-阿基诺西法和戈-盖茨法在下颌麻醉中的疗效比较。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Dec;17(4):570-575. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1092-5. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Efficacy of Classical and Gow-Gates Technique for Providing Anesthesia During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Split Mouth Design.一项比较经典技术和Gow-Gates技术在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中麻醉效果的随机对照研究:一项自身对照设计。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017 Jun;16(2):186-191. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0960-0. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
6
Re: Comparison of local and general anaesthesia for arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint.关于:颞下颌关节关节穿刺术局部麻醉与全身麻醉的比较
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;55(6):645. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of three different treatment methods for temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction.三种不同治疗方法对不可复性颞下颌关节盘移位的疗效比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 May;46(5):603-609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
Effect of combination therapy of arthrocentesis and occlusal splint on nonreducing temporomandibular joint disk displacement.关节穿刺术与牙合垫联合治疗对不可复性颞下颌关节盘移位的影响。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2015 Dec;159(4):677-80. doi: 10.5507/bp.2014.044. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
9
A modified technique for auriculotemporal nerve blockade when performing selective scalp nerve block for craniotomy.开颅手术进行选择性头皮神经阻滞时改良的耳颞神经阻滞技术。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul;26(3):271-2. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000032.
10
Effect of simultaneous therapy of arthrocentesis and occlusal splints on temporomandibular disorders: anterior disc displacement without reduction.关节穿刺术与牙合垫同步治疗对颞下颌关节紊乱病的影响:不可复性盘前移位
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;39(1):14-20. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.1.14. Epub 2013 Feb 21.