Suppr超能文献

容积旋转调强弧形治疗中准直器轨道的优化:脊柱旁 SBRT 的开发与评估。

Optimization of collimator trajectory in volumetric modulated arc therapy: development and evaluation for paraspinal SBRT.

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jun 1;77(2):591-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.056. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop a collimator trajectory optimization paradigm for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and evaluate this technique in paraspinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

We propose a novel VMAT paradigm, Coll-VMAT, which integrates collimator rotation with synchronized gantry rotation, multileaf collimator (MLC) motion, and dose-rate modulation. At each gantry angle a principal component analysis (PCA) is applied to calculate the primary cord orientation. The collimator angle is then aligned so that MLC travel is parallel to the PCA-derived direction. An in-house VMAT optimization follows the geometry-based collimator trajectory optimization to obtain the optimal MLC position and monitor units (MU) at each gantry angle. A treatment planning study of five paraspinal SBRT patients compared Coll-VMAT to standard VMAT (fixed collimator angle) and static field IMRT plans. Plan evaluation statistics included planning target volume (PTV) V95%, PTV-D95%, cord-D05%, and total beam-on time.

RESULTS

Variation of collimator angle in Coll-VMAT plans ranges from 26 degrees to 54 degrees , with a median of 40 degrees . Patient-averaged PTV V95% (94.6% Coll-VMAT vs. 92.1% VMAT and 93.3% IMRT) and D95% (22.5 Gy vs. 21.4 Gy and 22.0 Gy, respectively) are highest with Coll-VMAT, and cord D05% (9.8 Gy vs. 10.0 Gy and 11.7 Gy) is lowest. Total beam-on time with Coll-VMAT (5,164 MU) is comparable to standard VMAT (4,868 MU) and substantially lower than IMRT (13,283 MU).

CONCLUSION

Collimator trajectory optimization-based VMAT provides an additional degree of freedom that can improve target coverage and cord sparing of paraspinal SBRT plans compared with standard VMAT and IMRT approaches.

摘要

目的

开发一种适用于容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)的准直器轨迹优化范例,并在脊柱旁立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)中评估该技术。

方法和材料

我们提出了一种新的 VMAT 范例,即 Coll-VMAT,它将准直器旋转与同步旋转机架、多叶准直器(MLC)运动和剂量率调制相结合。在每个机架角度应用主成分分析(PCA)来计算主要脊髓方向。然后对准准直器角度,使 MLC 行程与 PCA 得出的方向平行。随后进行基于几何形状的准直器轨迹优化,以获得最佳 MLC 位置和每个机架角度的监测器单位(MU)。对五例脊柱旁 SBRT 患者的治疗计划研究将 Coll-VMAT 与标准 VMAT(固定准直器角度)和静态场调强放疗计划进行了比较。计划评估统计包括计划靶区(PTV)V95%、PTV-D95%、脊髓-D05%和总束照射时间。

结果

Coll-VMAT 计划中的准直器角度变化范围为 26 度至 54 度,中位数为 40 度。患者平均 PTV V95%(94.6% Coll-VMAT 比 92.1% VMAT 和 93.3% IMRT)和 D95%(22.5 Gy 比 21.4 Gy 和 22.0 Gy)最高,脊髓 D05%(9.8 Gy 比 10.0 Gy 和 11.7 Gy)最低。Coll-VMAT 的总束照射时间(5164 MU)与标准 VMAT(4868 MU)相当,明显低于 IMRT(13283 MU)。

结论

基于准直器轨迹优化的 VMAT 提供了一个额外的自由度,与标准 VMAT 和 IMRT 方法相比,可以提高脊柱旁 SBRT 计划的靶区覆盖率和脊髓保护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验