Division of Head and Neck Surgery, The Laryngeal Dynamics Laboratory, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
J Voice. 2011 Jan;25(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.005. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
To assess the accuracy of the indentation method for stiffness measurements and to estimate the Young's modulus of the vocal fold using this technique.
Basic science.
Indentation tests were performed using a range of indenter diameters and indentation depths on single- and double-layer silicone rubber models with various cover-layer thicknesses with known geometry and Young's moduli. Measurements were repeated on intact vocal folds and isolated muscle and cover-layer samples from three cadaveric human larynges.
Indentation on single-layer rubber models yielded Young's moduli with acceptable accuracy when the indentation depth was equal to or smaller than the indenter diameter, and both were smaller than the physical dimensions of the material sample. On two-layer models, the stiffness estimation was similarly influenced by indenter diameter and indentation depth, and acceptable accuracy was reached when indentation depth was much smaller than the height of the top cover layer. Measurements on midmembranous vocal fold tissue revealed location-dependent Young's moduli (in kPa) as follows: intact hemilarynx, 8.6 (range=5.3-13.1); isolated inferior medial surface cover, 7.5 (range=7-7.9); isolated medial surface cover, 4.8 (range=3.9-5.7); isolated superior surface cover, 2.9 (range=2.7-3.2); and isolated thyroarytenoid muscle, 2.0 (range=1.3-2.7).
Indenter diameter, indentation depth, and material thickness are important parameters in the measurement of vocal fold stiffness using the indentation technique. Measurements on human larynges showed location-dependent differences in stiffness. The stiffness of the vocal folds was also found to be higher when the vocal fold structure was still attached to the laryngeal framework compared with that when the vocal fold was separated from the framework.
评估压痕法测量硬度的准确性,并使用该技术估计声带的杨氏模量。
基础科学。
使用各种覆盖层厚度的单层和双层硅橡胶模型进行压痕测试,这些模型具有已知的几何形状和杨氏模量。使用各种直径和压痕深度的压头进行测试。测试在三个尸体人喉的完整声带、分离的肌肉和覆盖层样本上重复进行。
在单层橡胶模型上进行压痕时,如果压痕深度等于或小于压头直径,并且两者均小于材料样本的物理尺寸,则杨氏模量的测量具有可接受的精度。在双层模型上,压头直径和压痕深度同样会影响硬度估计,当压痕深度远小于顶层覆盖层的高度时,可达到可接受的精度。对中膜性声带组织的测量显示,杨氏模量(kPa)随位置而异,如下所示:完整半喉,8.6(范围=5.3-13.1);分离的下内侧表面覆盖层,7.5(范围=7-7.9);分离的内侧表面覆盖层,4.8(范围=3.9-5.7);分离的上表面覆盖层,2.9(范围=2.7-3.2);和分离的甲状软骨肌,2.0(范围=1.3-2.7)。
压头直径、压痕深度和材料厚度是使用压痕技术测量声带硬度的重要参数。对人喉的测量显示,硬度存在位置依赖性差异。与声带从框架上分离时相比,当声带结构仍然附着在喉框架上时,声带的硬度也更高。