Hairol Mohd Izzuddin, Waugh Sarah J
Anglia Vision Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
Vision Res. 2010 Apr 21;50(9):889-903. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
Foveal detection thresholds for luminance-modulated (LM) and contrast-modulated (CM) blobs in the presence of fixed modulation, laterally placed noise blobs (separations of 0-6 degrees ) were measured in four observers with normal vision. Detection thresholds measured for LM blobs placed between highly visible LM flankers (111) and for CM blobs placed between highly visible CM flankers (222) produces a similar pattern of lateral interaction effects, i.e. masking where the stimuli overlap and facilitation for separations of 4-8x blob sd units. The region of facilitation is not matched by shallow psychometric function slopes. Detection thresholds measured for LM blobs placed between highly visible CM flankers (212) are generally facilitatory but relatively raised for separations of 0.5-2 degrees . For CM blobs placed between highly visible LM flankers (121), facilitation is stronger in the 0.5-2 degrees region. A significant correlation between thresholds and psychometric function slopes is found only for the 212 condition. We propose a model with two separate but interacting processing streams for the detection of LM and CM targets that may engage different cortical loci.
在固定调制条件下,对四名视力正常的观察者测量了在存在横向放置的噪声斑点(间隔为0 - 6度)时,亮度调制(LM)和对比度调制(CM)斑点的中央凹检测阈值。对置于高度可见的LM侧翼(111)之间的LM斑点以及置于高度可见的CM侧翼(222)之间的CM斑点测量的检测阈值产生了类似的横向相互作用效应模式,即刺激重叠处的掩蔽以及4 - 8倍斑点标准差单位间隔处的促进作用。促进作用区域与浅心理测量函数斜率不匹配。对置于高度可见的CM侧翼(212)之间的LM斑点测量的检测阈值通常具有促进作用,但在0.5 - 2度间隔处相对升高。对于置于高度可见的LM侧翼(121)之间 的CM斑点,在0.5 - 2度区域促进作用更强。仅在212条件下发现阈值与心理测量函数斜率之间存在显著相关性。我们提出了一个模型,该模型具有两个独立但相互作用的处理流来检测LM和CM目标,这两个处理流可能涉及不同的皮质位点。