Harbach P R, Rostami H J, Aaron C S, Wiser S K, Grzegorczyk C R
Genetic Toxicology Research, Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI 49007.
Mutat Res. 1991 Apr;252(2):139-48. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(91)90014-y.
The in vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay measures DNA repair (incorporation of [3H]thymidine) following in vitro treatment of rat primary hepatocytes. The autoradiographic method was used to detect UDS by counting developed silver grains in the photographic emulsion overlaying nuclei and cytoplasmic areas of the hepatocytes. In this communication we report results using 4 scoring methods: (1) the 2 most heavily labeled cytoplasmic areas adjacent to the nucleus (our standard method), (2) the cytoplasmic area left of the nucleus, (3) the cytoplasmic areas left and right of the nucleus, and (4) 2 cytoplasmic areas whose positions were selected at random. Rat primary hepatocyte cultures treated with a medium control, a solvent control (dimethyl sulfoxide) and 5 known genotoxic chemicals (2-acetylaminofluorene, dimethylnitrosamine, diethylnitrosamine, methyl methanesulfonate and ethyl methanesulfonate) were scored using these 4 methods. The average or maximum cytoplasmic grain count was subtracted from the nuclear grain count to yield net grains/nucleus (NG). In general, NG counts for Methods 2, 3 and 4 were similar, although shifted about 3-10 grains higher than Method 1 for controls and most treated groups. Methods 2, 3 and 4 showed more experiment-to-experiment variability in sensitivity for detecting statistically significant increases in treated groups than did our standard method. Thus, the alternative methods afforded no consistent improvements in sensitivity or reduction of variability for this assay. Subtraction of the average or the highest cytoplasmic count had virtually no effect on the sensitivity of the assay, but simply requires an appropriate adjustment of the criteria for a positive response.
体外非预定DNA合成(UDS)试验用于检测大鼠原代肝细胞体外处理后的DNA修复情况([3H]胸腺嘧啶核苷的掺入)。采用放射自显影法,通过对覆盖肝细胞细胞核和细胞质区域的感光乳剂中显影的银粒进行计数来检测UDS。在本通讯中,我们报告了使用4种评分方法的结果:(1)紧邻细胞核的2个标记最强烈的细胞质区域(我们的标准方法),(2)细胞核左侧的细胞质区域,(3)细胞核左右两侧的细胞质区域,以及(4)随机选择位置的2个细胞质区域。使用这4种方法对用培养基对照、溶剂对照(二甲基亚砜)和5种已知的遗传毒性化学物质(2-乙酰氨基芴、二甲基亚硝胺、二乙基亚硝胺、甲基磺酸甲酯和乙基磺酸甲酯)处理的大鼠原代肝细胞培养物进行评分。从细胞核银粒计数中减去平均或最大细胞质银粒计数,以得出净银粒/细胞核(NG)。一般来说,方法2、3和4的NG计数相似,尽管对于对照和大多数处理组,它们比方法1高出约3 - 10个银粒。与我们的标准方法相比,方法2、3和4在检测处理组中统计学上显著增加的敏感性方面,实验间的变异性更大。因此,对于该试验,替代方法在敏感性或变异性降低方面没有一致的改进。减去平均或最高细胞质计数对试验的敏感性几乎没有影响,只是需要对阳性反应的标准进行适当调整。