Suppr超能文献

实时 PCR 比多重 PCR 更敏感,可用于诊断和血清分型儿童中培养阴性的肺炎球菌侵袭性疾病。

Realtime PCR is more sensitive than multiplex PCR for diagnosis and serotyping in children with culture negative pneumococcal invasive disease.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009282.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumococcal serotyping is usually performed by Quellung reaction, considered the gold standard test. However the method cannot be used on culture-negative samples. Molecular methods can be a useful alternative. The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of Multiplex-sequential-PCR (MS-PCR) or Realtime-PCR on blood samples for diagnosis and serotyping of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in a pediatric clinical setting.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Sensitivity and specificity of MS-PCR and Realtime-PCR have been evaluated both on 46 well characterized pneumococcal isolates and on 67 clinical samples from children with culture-negative IPD. No difference in sensitivity and specificity between MS-PCR and Realtime PCR was found when the methods were used on isolates: both methods could type 100% isolates and the results were always consistent with culture-based methods. On the contrary, when used on clinical samples 43/67 (64.2%) were typeable by MS-PCR and 61/67 (91.0%) by Realtime-PCR (p = 0.0004,K Cohen 0.3, McNemar's p<0.001). Non-typeability by MS-PCR was associated in 18/20 cases (90.0%) with low bacterial load. The difference between the two methods was present both when they were used on normally sterile fluids (respectively 31/33 (93.9%) typeable samples for Realtime-PCR and 24/33 (72.7%) for MS-PCR, p = 0.047, 95%CL 0.03-0.98; K Cohen 0.3; McNemar's p = 0.0016) and when they were used on nasopharyngeal swabs (respectively 30/34 (88.2%) typeable samples for Realtime-PCR and 19/34 (55.9%) for MS-PCR, p = 0.007, 95%CL 0.04-0.66); the presence of multiple pneumococcal serotypes in nasopharyngeal swabs was found more frequently by Realtime PCR (19/30; 63.3%) than by Multiplex-sequential PCR (3/19; 15.8%; p = 0.003;95%CL 1.87-39.97).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In conclusion, both MS-PCR and Realtime PCR can be used for pneumococcal serotyping of most serotypes/serogroups directly on clinical samples from culture-negative patients but Realtime-PCR appears more sensitive.

摘要

背景

肺炎球菌血清分型通常通过胶乳增强反应进行,被认为是金标准检测方法。然而,该方法不能用于培养阴性样本。分子方法可能是一种有用的替代方法。本研究旨在评估多重序列-PCR(MS-PCR)或实时 PCR 用于血液样本中儿童侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)的诊断和血清分型。

方法/主要发现:MS-PCR 和 Realtime-PCR 的敏感性和特异性已在 46 株特征明确的肺炎球菌分离株和 67 例培养阴性 IPD 患儿的临床样本上进行了评估。当在分离株上使用这些方法时,MS-PCR 和 Realtime-PCR 的敏感性和特异性无差异:两种方法均可对 100%的分离株进行分型,结果始终与基于培养的方法一致。相反,当在临床样本上使用时,43/67(64.2%)可通过 MS-PCR 进行分型,61/67(91.0%)可通过 Realtime-PCR 进行分型(p=0.0004,K 科恩 0.3,McNemar's p<0.001)。20 例(90.0%)非 MS-PCR 可分型病例与细菌载量低有关。两种方法之间的差异均存在于正常无菌液中(分别为 Realtime-PCR 33/33(93.9%)可分型样本和 MS-PCR 24/33(72.7%)可分型样本,p=0.047,95%置信区间 0.03-0.98;K 科恩 0.3;McNemar's p=0.0016)和鼻咽拭子(分别为 Realtime-PCR 34/34(88.2%)可分型样本和 MS-PCR 19/34(55.9%)可分型样本,p=0.007,95%置信区间 0.04-0.66);鼻咽拭子中发现多种肺炎球菌血清型的情况更为常见 Realtime-PCR(19/30;63.3%)比 Multiplex-sequential PCR(3/19;15.8%;p=0.003;95%置信区间 1.87-39.97)。

结论

总之,MS-PCR 和 Realtime-PCR 均可直接从培养阴性患者的临床样本中对大多数血清型/血清群进行肺炎球菌血清分型,但 Realtime-PCR 似乎更敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a53/2824814/cde075ac36d3/pone.0009282.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验