Suppr超能文献

来自布匿迦太基的骨骼残骸并不支持系统地牺牲婴儿。

Skeletal remains from Punic Carthage do not support systematic sacrifice of infants.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Feb 17;5(2):e9177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009177.

Abstract

Two types of cemeteries occur at Punic Carthage and other Carthaginian settlements: one centrally situated housing the remains of older children through adults, and another at the periphery of the settlement (the "Tophet") yielding small urns containing the cremated skeletal remains of very young animals and humans, sometimes comingled. Although the absence of the youngest humans at the primary cemeteries is unusual and worthy of discussion, debate has focused on the significance of Tophets, especially at Carthage, as burial grounds for the young. One interpretation, based on two supposed eye-witness reports of large-scale Carthaginian infant sacrifice [Kleitarchos (3(rd) c. BCE) and Diodorus Siculus (1(st) c. BCE)], a particular translation of inscriptions on some burial monuments, and the argument that if the animals had been sacrificed so too were the humans, is that Tophets represent burial grounds reserved for sacrificial victims. An alternative hypothesis acknowledges that while the Carthaginians may have occasionally sacrificed humans, as did their contemporaries, the extreme youth of Tophet individuals suggests these cemeteries were not only for the sacrificed, but also for the very young, however they died. Here we present the first rigorous analysis of the largest sample of cremated human skeletal remains (348 burial urns, N = 540 individuals) from the Carthaginian Tophet based on tooth formation, enamel histology, cranial and postcranial metrics, and the potential effects of heat-induced bone shrinkage. Most of the sample fell within the period prenatal to 5-to-6 postnatal months, with a significant presence of prenates. Rather than indicating sacrifice as the agent of death, this age distribution is consistent with modern-day data on perinatal mortality, which at Carthage would also have been exacerbated by numerous diseases common in other major cities, such as Rome and Pompeii. Our diverse approaches to analyzing the cremated human remains from Carthage strongly support the conclusion that Tophets were cemeteries for those who died shortly before or after birth, regardless of the cause.

摘要

在布匿迦太基和其他迦太基人定居点存在两种类型的墓地

一种位于中心位置,埋葬着年龄较大的儿童和成年人的遗体;另一种位于定居点的外围(“托菲特”),里面有盛放着非常年幼的动物和人类火化骨骼遗骸的小骨灰盒,有时这些遗骸是混合在一起的。虽然主要墓地中没有最年幼的人类是不寻常的,值得讨论,但争论的焦点一直是托菲特的意义,尤其是在迦太基,作为年轻人生存的墓地。一种解释是基于两个据称是对大规模迦太基婴儿祭祀的目击报告[克莱塔克斯(公元前 3 世纪)和狄奥多罗斯·西库卢斯(公元前 1 世纪)],对一些埋葬纪念碑上铭文的特定翻译,以及如果动物被牺牲了,那么人类也会被牺牲的观点,即托菲特代表了专门为祭祀牺牲者保留的墓地。另一种假设承认,尽管迦太基人可能偶尔会像他们的同时代人那样牺牲人类,但托菲特个体的极端年幼表明,这些墓地不仅是为祭祀牺牲者准备的,也是为非常年幼的人准备的,无论他们是如何死亡的。在这里,我们首次对来自迦太基托菲特的最大规模火化人类骨骼遗骸样本(348 个骨灰盒,N=540 个人)进行了严格的分析,这些样本基于牙齿形成、牙釉质组织学、头颅和后颅骨测量以及热诱导骨骼收缩的潜在影响。样本中的大部分都处于产前到 5-6 个月产后的阶段,而且有很多早产儿。这种年龄分布与现代围产期死亡率的数据一致,而不是表明牺牲是死亡的原因,这与迦太基的情况一致,在那里,许多常见于其他主要城市的疾病,如罗马和庞贝,也会使围产期死亡率恶化。我们采用多种方法分析来自迦太基的火化人类遗骸,这有力地支持了托菲特是那些在出生前后不久死亡的人的墓地的结论,而不论其死因如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bc4/2822869/fec28a6fc93e/pone.0009177.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验