Department of Surgery, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Gotenstraße 6-8, 65929, Frankfurt a. M., Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0600-y. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
This study evaluates medical and economic effects of a clinical pathway (CP) for open lobectomy and bilobectomy with respect to process quality, outcome quality, and hospital cost.
We compared 38 consecutive patients who underwent open lobectomy or bilobectomy between April 2007 and June 2008 and were treated with a CP (CP group) with 43 consecutive patients treated without CP between 2005 and 2007 (pre-pathway group). Indicators for process quality were duration of catheter placement, pain intensity, respiratory exercising, and mobilization. Outcome quality was measured through morbidity, mortality, re-operations, and re-admissions. Cost of hospital stay was calculated using an imputed daily rate.
Central venous catheters were used in 90% of patients in the CP group (pre-pathway group 40%; p < 0.0001). Epidural catheters were placed in 84% of patients in the CP group (pre-pathway group 56%; p = 0.01). Variation in duration of catheter placement was reduced in the CP group. The reduction of hospital stay was 3 days (-19%, p = 0.003). Perioperative outcome quality remained unchanged. There was a significant cost reduction of 1,614 euros per stay after CP introduction (-19%; p = 0.003).
After CP implementation for open lobectomy the quality and standardization of care improved. Although length of hospital stay was significantly reduced, there was no significant increase of re-admissions or morbidity. Patients benefited from a shortened hospital stay while the hospital achieved cost reduction. This early analysis shows that the implementation of CP for open lobectomy has positive effects in terms of quality and cost of care.
本研究评估了临床路径(CP)对开胸肺叶切除术和双肺叶切除术在流程质量、结果质量和医院成本方面的医疗和经济影响。
我们比较了 2007 年 4 月至 2008 年 6 月期间接受开胸肺叶切除术或双肺叶切除术且采用 CP(CP 组)治疗的 38 例连续患者与 2005 年至 2007 年期间未采用 CP 治疗的 43 例连续患者(前路径组)。流程质量的指标包括导管留置时间、疼痛强度、呼吸锻炼和活动能力。结果质量通过发病率、死亡率、再次手术和再次入院来衡量。使用估算的每日费率计算住院费用。
CP 组 90%的患者使用中心静脉导管(前路径组 40%;p<0.0001),CP 组 84%的患者使用硬膜外导管(前路径组 56%;p=0.01)。CP 组的导管留置时间差异减少。住院时间减少了 3 天(-19%,p=0.003)。围手术期结果质量保持不变。引入 CP 后,住院费用减少了 1614 欧元(-19%,p=0.003)。
开胸肺叶切除术后实施 CP 可提高护理质量和标准化。尽管住院时间明显缩短,但再次入院或发病率没有显著增加。患者受益于缩短的住院时间,而医院则实现了成本节约。这项早期分析表明,实施开胸肺叶切除术 CP 具有提高护理质量和降低成本的积极影响。