• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:我们负担得起吗?

Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: can we afford it?

作者信息

Casali Gianluca, Walker William S

机构信息

Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.11.008
PMID:19136272
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy offers advantages with regard to pain, respiratory function and mobility, concern is often expressed concerning the cost of stapling devices and increased operative time. We have therefore compared the costs of VATS and open lobectomy in order to assess the overall economic sustainability of a VATS programme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2006 346 patients underwent pulmonary lobectomy mainly for stage I or II lung cancer (93 VATS lobectomy, 253 thoracotomy). In the VATS group 47% of patients had an upper lobectomy versus 52% in the open group (p=ns). Direct medical costs (disposables, theatre time, high dependency unit stay, hospital stay) were determined and stratified by lobectomy type.

RESULTS

Mean theatre cost for a VATS lobectomy was 2533+/-230 euro versus 1280+/-54 euro for a thoracotomy lobectomy (p=0.00001). Mean high dependency unit (HDU) cost was 1713+/-236 euro and 2571+/-80 euro for a VATS and a thoracotomy lobectomy, respectively (p=0.00001). Mean cost of hospital stay for a VATS lobectomy was 3776+/-281 euro versus 4325+/-154 euro for an open one (p=0.00001). The overall cost for a VATS lobectomy was 8023+/-565 euro which was less than an open lobectomy 8178+/-167 euro (p=0.0002). VATS bilobectomy was slightly more expensive than an open one: 8702+/-350 euro versus 8655+/-466 euro but this difference (47 euro) was not significant (p=ns).

CONCLUSION

VATS lobectomy is less expensive than conventional lobectomy. Increased theatre costs (disposables and time) are counteracted by shorter hospital stay. Importantly, the reduced HDU and ward bed stays free resources for other patients.

摘要

引言

尽管电视辅助胸腔镜(VATS)肺叶切除术在疼痛、呼吸功能和活动能力方面具有优势,但人们常常对缝合器械的成本和手术时间增加表示担忧。因此,我们比较了VATS和开胸肺叶切除术的成本,以评估VATS手术方案的整体经济可持续性。

材料与方法

2004年1月至2006年12月期间,346例患者接受了肺叶切除术,主要用于治疗I期或II期肺癌(93例VATS肺叶切除术,253例开胸手术)。在VATS组中,47%的患者接受了上叶切除术,而开胸组为52%(p=无统计学意义)。确定了直接医疗成本(一次性用品、手术时间、重症监护病房停留时间、住院时间),并按肺叶切除术类型进行分层。

结果

VATS肺叶切除术的平均手术成本为2533±230欧元,而开胸肺叶切除术为1280±54欧元(p=0.00001)。VATS和开胸肺叶切除术的平均重症监护病房(HDU)成本分别为1713±236欧元和2571±80欧元(p=0.00001)。VATS肺叶切除术的平均住院成本为3776±281欧元,而开胸手术为4325±154欧元(p=0.00001)。VATS肺叶切除术的总成本为8023±565欧元,低于开胸肺叶切除术的8178±167欧元(p=0.0002)。VATS双叶切除术比开胸手术略贵:8702±350欧元对8655±466欧元,但这种差异(47欧元)不显著(p=无统计学意义)。

结论

VATS肺叶切除术比传统肺叶切除术成本更低。手术成本增加(一次性用品和时间)被缩短的住院时间所抵消。重要的是,HDU和病房停留时间的减少为其他患者释放了资源。

相似文献

1
Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: can we afford it?电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:我们负担得起吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
2
Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients.13619 例患者的电视辅助胸腔镜与开胸肺叶切除术比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 May;89(5):1563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.026.
3
Morbidity in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: is VATS lobectomy really safe?临床I期非小细胞肺癌电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的发病率:电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术真的安全吗?
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Apr;57(3):156-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039267. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
4
Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)与开胸手术治疗肺癌的肺叶切除术对比
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul;138(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.030.
5
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.对于临床I期非小细胞肺癌的切除,电视辅助胸腔镜手术比开胸手术更具优势。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jun;83(6):1965-70. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.049.
6
Evolution to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after training: initial results of the first 30 patients.培训后向电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的转变:前30例患者的初步结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
7
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统开胸肺叶切除术治疗临床ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;6(5):614-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.157701. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
8
Ninety-day costs of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer.肺癌电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸肺叶切除术 90 天费用比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 May 10.
9
Thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy: differential impairment of cellular immunity.胸腔镜与开胸手术行肺叶切除术:对细胞免疫的不同损害
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1735-44. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.001.
10
Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy.机器人辅助、电视辅助胸腔镜手术及开胸手术三种肺叶切除方法的成本比较
Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Aug;18(3):297-300, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.05.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Video-Assisted vs Robotic-Assisted Lung Lobectomies for Operating Room Resource Utilization and Patient Outcomes.电视辅助与机器人辅助肺叶切除术对手术室资源利用及患者预后的影响
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e248881. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8881.
2
Intersurgeon variations in postoperative length of stay after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术后外科医生之间的术后住院时间差异。
JTCVS Open. 2024 Jan 8;18:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.01.003. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
A Retrospective Analysis Comparing VATS Cost Discrepancies and Outcomes in Primary Lung Cancer vs. Second Primary Lung Cancer Patients.
一项比较原发性肺癌与第二原发性肺癌患者电视辅助胸腔镜手术成本差异及结果的回顾性分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;11(12):1745. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121745.
4
Is robotic lobectomy cheaper? A micro-cost analysis.机器人肺叶切除术更便宜吗?一项微观成本分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1441-1450. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01377-x. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Thoracoscopy: The past, the present and the future! A personal journey.胸腔镜检查:过去、现在与未来!一段个人历程。
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 3;24(1). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2018.v24i1.182. eCollection 2018.
6
Is video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy associated with higher overall costs compared with open surgery? Results of best evidence topic analysis.与开放手术相比,电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术是否会增加总费用?最佳证据主题分析结果。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Mar;12(5):567-579. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13708. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Factors Affecting the Number of Stapler Cartridges in Complete Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.影响非小细胞肺癌全胸腔镜肺叶切除术吻合器钉仓数量的因素
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr 5;53(2):53-57. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.2.53.
8
First experiences and complications in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at a thoracic surgery center.一家胸外科中心电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术的首次经验及并发症
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018 Jan 9;26(1):116-122. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.13641. eCollection 2018 Jan.
9
Comparison of costs of hospitalization of patients with primary lung cancer after lobectomy with access through classic thoracotomy and VATS in the conditions of financing based on diagnosis-related groups.在基于诊断相关组的融资条件下,对原发性肺癌患者行肺叶切除术后经传统开胸手术和电视辅助胸腔镜手术的住院费用进行比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Aug;11(8):3490-3495. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.90.
10
Is incentive spirometry beneficial for patients with lung cancer receiving video-assisted thoracic surgery?激励式肺量计对接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术的肺癌患者是否有益?
BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0885-8.