Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), 505, boul. De Maisonneuve Ouest, Montreal, QC, H3A 3C2, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jul;109(4):577-90. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1389-7. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Different back muscle reflex assessment protocols have shown abnormally longer reflex latency responses of back muscles in chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, many confounding variables are difficult to control, such as the load magnitude and the preactivation of trunk muscles. The aims of this study were to evaluate, in 30 subjects with CLBP and 30 healthy controls, the activation levels of back muscles during pre-loading and their reflex responses to sudden loading. After subjected to six practice perturbations, 20 sudden and unexpected forward perturbations of the trunk were applied in 30 CLBP subjects (14 women) and 31 controls (17 women), while attempting to minimize the confounding effect of preactivation level and perturbation amplitude. Reflex latency and amplitudes were computed from the surface EMG signals of four back muscles (bilaterally at L5, L3, L1, T10 vertebral levels). EMG was also collected from abdominal muscles. Subjects with CLBP significantly increased the preactivation of back muscles (abdominal preactivation the same) relative to controls while no sex effect was observed. While adjusting statistically for these differences, reflex amplitude was significantly higher in subjects with CLBP and men, compared to healthy controls and women, respectively. Interestingly, contrary to most of the literature available, no between-group effects were detected for reflex latency, which could potentially be explained by an appropriate control of confounding variables, but this remains to be clarified in future research.
不同的背部肌肉反射评估方案已经表明,慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的背部肌肉反射潜伏期反应异常延长。然而,许多混杂变量很难控制,例如负荷大小和躯干肌肉的预激活。本研究的目的是在 30 名 CLBP 患者和 30 名健康对照组中评估,在预加载过程中背部肌肉的激活水平及其对突然加载的反射反应。在进行了六次练习扰动后,在 30 名 CLBP 患者(14 名女性)和 31 名对照组(17 名女性)中施加了 20 次突然和意外的躯干向前扰动,同时尽量减少预激活水平和扰动幅度的混杂影响。从四个背部肌肉(L5、L3、L1、T10 椎体水平双侧)的表面肌电图信号中计算出反射潜伏期和幅度。还从腹部肌肉中收集了肌电图。与对照组相比,CLBP 患者的背部肌肉预激活明显增加(腹部预激活相同),但未观察到性别影响。在对这些差异进行统计学调整后,与健康对照组和女性相比,CLBP 患者和男性的反射幅度明显更高。有趣的是,与大多数现有文献相反,反射潜伏期没有检测到组间差异,这可能是由于对混杂变量进行了适当控制,但这仍需在未来的研究中阐明。