• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助与全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的短期和中期结果比较:一项病例对照研究。

Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Aosta Valley Regional Hospital Umberto Parini, via Adamello, 16, 11100, Aosta, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2085-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0902-8. Epub 2010 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-0902-8
PMID:20174945
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the short- and medium-term results obtained by totally laparoscopic right colectomy (TL) with those obtained by laparoscopically assisted right colectomy (LAC) for the treatment of right colon cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study compared two nonstatistically different groups (50 TL and 50 LAC cases) managed for nonmetastatic malignant tumors. The study outcomes included operative time, length of minilaparotomy, intraoperative complications, postoperative pain, time to resumption of the gastrointestinal functions, permanence of abdominal drain, analgesic therapy duration, postoperative complications, hospitalization time, number of harvested lymph nodes, and distant metastases onset.

RESULTS

The mean operative times were 78 ± 25 min (TL group) and 92 ± 22 min (LAC group) (p < 0.05). The findings showed a lower postoperative pain level associated with a reduction in analgesic consumption (p > 0.05) and earlier restoration of digestive function in the TL group than in the LAC group. The mean hospital stays were approximately 5 days (TL) and 7 days (LAC) (p < 0.05). No complications occurred either intra- or postoperatively, and similarly, the TL group experienced no mortality. In comparison, the LAC group had a 30% complication rate (p < 0.05). The complications included one case of intraoperative small bowel lesion, three cases of postoperative respiratory infections, three cases of anastomotic leakage, two cases of intestinal occlusion, three cases of minilaparotomy infection, one case of postoperative femoral neurosis, one case of postoperative heart attack, and one case of postoperative pancreatitis. The mortality rate was 0%. Neither group had a recurrence of the neoplastic disease during a 4-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings seem to demonstrate that TL right colectomy is feasible and safe, yielding results comparable with those of the open approach but offering improved postoperative patient comfort. The limits of this retrospective comparative study do not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn despite the encouraging data for the next prospective randomized studies.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术(TL)与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术(LAC)治疗右半结肠癌的短期和中期结果。

方法

回顾性研究比较了两组非统计学差异的患者(TL 组 50 例,LAC 组 50 例),均为非转移性恶性肿瘤。研究结果包括手术时间、小切口长度、术中并发症、术后疼痛、胃肠道功能恢复时间、引流管留置时间、镇痛治疗持续时间、术后并发症、住院时间、淋巴结清扫数量和远处转移发生情况。

结果

TL 组和 LAC 组的平均手术时间分别为 78±25 分钟和 92±22 分钟(p<0.05)。TL 组术后疼痛程度较低,镇痛药物消耗减少(p>0.05),消化功能恢复较早。TL 组和 LAC 组的平均住院时间分别约为 5 天和 7 天(p<0.05)。TL 组无术中或术后并发症,无死亡病例;而 LAC 组并发症发生率为 30%(p<0.05),包括术中小肠损伤 1 例,术后呼吸感染 3 例,吻合口漏 3 例,肠梗阻 2 例,小切口感染 3 例,术后股神经病变 1 例,心肌梗死 1 例,胰腺炎 1 例。两组在 4 年随访期间均无肿瘤疾病复发。

结论

TL 右半结肠切除术是可行且安全的,其结果与开放手术相当,但可提高术后患者舒适度。尽管数据令人鼓舞,但本回顾性比较研究的局限性不允许得出明确结论,需要进一步进行前瞻性随机研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study.腹腔镜辅助与全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的短期和中期结果比较:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2085-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0902-8. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
2
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term outcomes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:短期结局是否存在优势?我们中心的前瞻性对比评估。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2613-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2799-5. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
3
Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically-assisted vs. transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study.腹腔镜辅助与横切口开放右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌的短期疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2007 May 11;5:49. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-49.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Dec;14(6):329-34. doi: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.329.
5
Clinical outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal resection, anastomosis, and retrieval of specimen.经阴道切除、吻合和取出标本的腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的临床结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1473-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f1cc17.
6
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术的比较。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 May 4.
7
Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer.腹腔镜由内侧向外侧入路治疗右侧结肠癌根治术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jun;14(6):1878-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9153-2. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
8
[Short-term efficacy of preservation versus non-preservation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic-assisted radical resection for left hemicolon cancer].[腹腔镜辅助左半结肠癌根治术中保留与不保留肠系膜下动脉的短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 25;23(11):1074-1080. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.441530-20191124-00495.
9
[Short-term efficacy of totally laparoscopic left colon cancer radical resection with overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis technique].完全腹腔镜下左半结肠癌根治术采用重叠三角吻合技术的短期疗效
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;42(6):507-512. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20190707-00415.
10
Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy.机器人辅助与标准腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2012 Sep;99(9):1219-26. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8841.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress on surgical approach and intestinal anastomosis methods for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: A review.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的手术入路及肠吻合方法的研究进展:综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43956. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043956.
2
Elevating surgical standards: The role of intraperitoneal isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis in colon cancer surgery.提升手术标准:结肠内同向蠕动端端吻合术在结肠癌手术中的作用
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):106645. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106645.
3
Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: an affiliated study of a multicenter snapshot study.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery.术后恢复的多模式方法。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Aug;15(4):355-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe7.
2
The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit.腹腔镜结肠切除术的学习曲线:一名大学结直肠科外科住院医师的经验
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1603-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0497-0. Epub 2009 May 19.
3
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.
腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后体外与体内侧侧吻合的短期结局:一项多中心横断面研究的附属研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2630-2640. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11592-w. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
4
Comparison of different surgical techniques and anastomosis methods in short-term outcomes of right colon cancer: a network meta-analysis of open surgery, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis.不同手术技术和吻合方法对右结肠癌短期预后的比较:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术联合体外和体内吻合的网状Meta分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):309-325. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02096-2. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
5
Laparoscopic assisted colectomy versus laparoscopic complete colectomy: a cost analysis.腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术与腹腔镜全结肠切除术:成本分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Oct;76(6):2151-2162. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01876-6. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review of the evidence.机器人与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:系统评价证据。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 11;18(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01862-5.
7
The value of mesenteric closure after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a scoping review.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术系膜关闭的价值:范围综述。
BMC Surg. 2023 May 17;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02033-3.
8
Pathological and perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic transverse colon cancer resection: retrospective multicentre study.腹腔镜横结肠癌切除术中体外与体内吻合的病理和围手术期结果:回顾性多中心研究。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad045.
9
Intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中体内吻合与体外吻合的术中和术后短期结局
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 12;13:1145579. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1145579. eCollection 2023.
10
Effect of intracorporeal anastomosis on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy.体内吻合对腹腔镜右半结肠切除术后肠梗阻的影响
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Mar;104(3):156-163. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.156. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
4
Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease.腹腔镜及微创切除恶性结直肠疾病
Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;88(5):1047-72, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2008.05.009.
5
Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients.标准化腹腔镜体内右半结肠切除术治疗癌症:111例未经筛选患者的短期结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Sep;51(9):1350-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9341-1. Epub 2008 May 14.
6
Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠手术中的手辅助或腹腔镜辅助入路:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Aug;22(8):1769-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9857-4. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
7
Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的长期结果
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD003432. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003432.pub2.
8
Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌手术后伤口感染的危险因素。
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1138-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9528-6.
9
[Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs. open technique].结肠癌右半结肠切除术:一项比较腹腔镜与开放技术的前瞻性随机研究
Chir Ital. 2008 Jan-Feb;60(1):1-7.
10
[Colon cancer and laparoscopy: state of the art in 2007].
Bull Cancer. 2007 Dec;94(12):1053-8. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2007.0520.