Kim Sangwoo, Bae Sung Uk, Jeong Woon Kyung, Baek Seong Kyu, Son Young-Gil
Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Mar;104(3):156-163. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.156. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) remains the most widely adopted technique despite mounting evidence that intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) offers several advantages. This study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of ICA and ECA and to investigate the effect of ICA on postoperative ileus after LRC.
This retrospective study included 45 patients who underwent ICA and 63 who underwent ECA in LRC for right-sided colonic diseases between January 2015 and December 2019.
There were no significant differences in total operation time, blood loss, total length of incisions, tolerance of diet, postoperative pain score on postoperative days 1 and 2, or length of hospital stays between the 2 groups. However, the ICA group had a significantly shorter time to first flatus passage (3.0 ± 0.9 days 3.8 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.013). The rate of postoperative ileus was significantly higher in the ECA group (2.2% 14.3%, P = 0.033); however, there was no significant difference in the overall morbidity within 30 days after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the ECA technique (odds ratio [OR], 0.098; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.011-0.883, P = 0.038) and previous abdominal operation (OR, 5.269; 95% CI, 1.193-23.262; P = 0.028) were independent risk factors for postoperative ileus.
The postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent LRC with ICA or ECA were comparable, and ICA could reduce the incidence of postoperative ileus after LRC compared with ECA.
尽管越来越多的证据表明体内吻合术(ICA)具有诸多优势,但腹腔镜右半结肠切除术(LRC)加体外吻合术(ECA)仍是应用最广泛的技术。本研究旨在比较ICA和ECA的术后结果,并探讨ICA对LRC术后肠梗阻的影响。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年1月至2019年12月期间因右侧结肠疾病接受LRC且采用ICA的45例患者和采用ECA的63例患者。
两组在总手术时间、失血量、切口总长度、饮食耐受性、术后第1天和第2天的术后疼痛评分或住院时间方面均无显著差异。然而,ICA组首次排气时间明显更短(3.0±0.9天对3.8±1.9天,P=0.013)。ECA组术后肠梗阻发生率明显更高(2.2%对14.3%,P=0.033);然而,术后30天内的总体发病率无显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,ECA技术(比值比[OR],0.098;95%置信区间[CI]:0.011-0.883,P=0.038)和既往腹部手术(OR,5.269;95%CI,1.193-23.262;P=0.028)是术后肠梗阻的独立危险因素。
接受ICA或ECA的LRC患者的术后结果具有可比性,与ECA相比,ICA可降低LRC术后肠梗阻的发生率。