• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道耻骨后无张力吊带术与迷你吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验

A randomised trial of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, Kent, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2010 May;117(6):730-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02513.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02513.x
PMID:20175874
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare a mini-sling with a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).

DESIGN

Randomised trial.

SETTING

Urogynaecology unit in large UK district general hospital.

POPULATION

Women with USI resistant to conservative management and requiring a suburethral sling.

METHODS

A total of 71 women with SUI and confirmed USI were randomised to undergo treatment with either a retropubic TVT or mini-sling. Follow-up was at 6 weeks, with a history, examination and quality of life questionnaire, and at 6 months with further subjective evaluation and twin-channel subtraction cystometry and pressure-flow studies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The presence of SUI at 6 weeks and 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

The mini-sling was associated with a significantly higher rate of persistent SUI at 6 weeks (OR 9.49, 95% CI 2.8-32.6) and 6 months (OR 8.14, 95% CI 2.7-24.7), and of USI at 6 months (OR 7.58, 95% CI 2.7-24.7). The rate of complication was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The mini-sling is associated with a higher failure rate than a retropubic TVT. Longer term and multicentre outcome data are necessary to explore these findings further. Until this is available, the mini-sling should be used with caution.

摘要

目的

比较迷你吊带与经耻骨后无张力阴道吊带(TVT)治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)和尿动力学压力性尿失禁(USI)的效果。

设计

随机试验。

地点

英国大型地区综合医院泌尿科。

人群

经保守治疗无效且需要尿道下吊带的 USI 女性。

方法

共有 71 名 SUI 合并确诊 USI 的女性患者被随机分为经耻骨后 TVT 或迷你吊带治疗组。在 6 周时进行随访,包括病史、检查和生活质量问卷,在 6 个月时进行进一步的主观评估和双通道减法膀胱测压和压力流研究。

主要观察指标

治疗后 6 周和 6 个月时 SUI 的存在情况。

结果

迷你吊带在治疗后 6 周和 6 个月时持续性 SUI 的发生率明显更高(OR 9.49,95%CI 2.8-32.6;OR 8.14,95%CI 2.7-24.7),且 USI 的发生率在 6 个月时也更高(OR 7.58,95%CI 2.7-24.7)。两组的并发症发生率相似。

结论

迷你吊带的失败率高于经耻骨后 TVT。需要进一步探索这些发现的长期和多中心结局数据。在获得这些数据之前,应谨慎使用迷你吊带。

相似文献

1
A randomised trial of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence.经阴道耻骨后无张力吊带术与迷你吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验
BJOG. 2010 May;117(6):730-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02513.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
2
Tension-free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium-term follow-up.无张力阴道吊带术与自体腹直肌筋膜耻骨后阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的中期随访
Med Princ Pract. 2008;17(3):209-14. doi: 10.1159/000117794. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
3
One-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and trans-obturator suburethral tape from inside to outside (TVT-O) for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a prospective randomised trial.无张力阴道吊带术(TVT)与经闭孔从内向外尿道下吊带术(TVT-O)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的一年随访:一项前瞻性随机试验
Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1376-82; discussion 1383-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.066. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
4
Single-incision mini-sling compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.经阴道单切口迷你吊带术与经阴道无张力吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):328-37. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318242a849.
5
Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicentre randomised trial.无张力阴道吊带术与经闭孔吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的比较:一项多中心随机试验的结果
Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.059. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
6
Randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator for urodynamic stress incontinence in women.经阴道无张力吊带术与经阴道无张力吊带-闭孔器术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验
J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.064. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
7
Trans-obturator urethral sling for the surgical correction of female stress urinary incontinence: outside-in (Monarc) versus inside-out (TVT-O). Are the two ways reassuring?经闭孔尿道悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的手术矫正:由外向内(Monarc)与由内向外(TVT-O)。两种方法是否可靠?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Aug;133(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.05.015. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
8
Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow-up.经阴道无张力吊带治疗尿动力学压力性尿失禁:10 年随访的疗效和不良反应。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):939-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.038. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
9
Editorial comment on: tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicentre randomised trial.关于“无张力阴道吊带术与经闭孔吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的多中心随机试验结果”的编辑评论
Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1490-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.060.
10
Two-year comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape for female urinary stress incontinence.无张力阴道吊带术与经闭孔吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的两年比较
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;30(3):281-4. doi: 10.3109/01443610903551756.

引用本文的文献

1
Instruments Used for the Assessment of SUI Severity in Urogynecologic Surgical Trials: A Scoping Review.用于妇科泌尿外科学手术试验中压力性尿失禁严重程度评估的器械:一项范围综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2255-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05934-w. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
2
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.经阴道单切口吊带术治疗女性尿失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
3
A new promising approach to urodynamic stress urinary incontinence care can help menopausal women.
一种治疗尿动力学压力性尿失禁的新的有前景的方法可以帮助更年期女性。
Prz Menopauzalny. 2023 Sep;22(3):121-125. doi: 10.5114/pm.2023.131058. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.单切口迷你吊带(MiniArc)与经闭孔中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010283.
5
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
6
Minimally invasive treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with the adjustable single-incision sling system (AJUST ™) in an elderly and overweight population.可调式单切口吊带系统(AJUST™)对老年超重女性压力性尿失禁的微创治疗
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):280-288. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0751. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
7
Transobturator versus single incision slings: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial.经闭孔吊带术与单切口吊带术:一项随机对照试验的1年结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Mar;28(3):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3128-z. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
8
Safety and efficacy of single-incision sling for female stress urinary incontinence: 3 years' results.单切口吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的安全性和有效性:3年结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Nov;27(11):1667-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3001-0. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
9
Transobturator Midurethral Slings versus Single-Incision Slings for Stress Incontinence in Overweight Patients.经闭孔尿道中段吊带术与单切口吊带术治疗超重患者压力性尿失禁的比较
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):714-21. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0209.
10
Non-compliance with randomised allocation and missing outcome data in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions: a systematic review.评估手术干预措施的随机对照试验中随机分配方案的不依从性及结局数据缺失情况:一项系统评价
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 2;8:403. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1364-9.