Steven A. Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, American Legacy Foundation, Washington DC, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3 Suppl):S351-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.011.
Only large increases in adult cessation will rapidly reduce population smoking prevalence. Evidence-based smoking-cessation treatments and treatment policies exist but are underutilized. More needs to be done to coordinate the widespread, efficient dissemination and implementation of effective treatments and policies. This paper is the first in a series of three to demonstrate the impact of an integrated, comprehensive systems approach to cessation treatment and policy. This paper provides an analytic framework and selected literature review that guide the two subsequent computer simulation modeling papers to show how critical leverage points may have an impact on reductions in smoking prevalence. Evidence is reviewed from the U.S. Public Health Service 2008 clinical practice guideline and other sources regarding the impact of five cessation treatment policies on quit attempts, use of evidence-based treatment, and quit rates. Cessation treatment policies would: (1) expand cessation treatment coverage and provider reimbursement; (2) mandate adequate funding for the use and promotion of evidence-based state-sponsored telephone quitlines; (3) support healthcare systems changes to prompt, guide, and incentivize tobacco treatment; (4) support and promote evidence-based treatment via the Internet; and (5) improve individually tailored, stepped-care approaches and the long-term effectiveness of evidence-based treatments. This series of papers provides an analytic framework to inform heuristic simulation models in order to take a new look at ways to markedly increase population smoking cessation by implementing a defined set of treatments and treatment-related policies with the potential to improve motivation to quit, evidence-based treatment use, and long-term effectiveness.
只有大幅提高成年人的戒烟率,才能迅速降低人口吸烟率。虽然存在基于证据的戒烟治疗方法和政策,但这些方法和政策尚未得到充分利用。需要进一步努力,协调广泛、有效地传播和实施有效的治疗方法和政策。本文是三篇系列论文中的第一篇,旨在展示综合全面的系统方法对戒烟治疗和政策的影响。本文提供了一个分析框架和文献综述,为后续两篇计算机模拟建模论文提供了指导,以展示关键的撬动因素可能如何对吸烟率的降低产生影响。本文从美国卫生与公众服务部 2008 年临床实践指南和其他来源审查了五项戒烟治疗政策对戒烟尝试、基于证据的治疗方法的使用和戒烟率的影响。戒烟治疗政策将:(1)扩大戒烟治疗的覆盖面和提供者的报销范围;(2)为使用和推广州政府资助的基于电话的戒烟热线提供足够的资金;(3)支持医疗保健系统的改变,以促进、指导和激励烟草治疗;(4)通过互联网支持和推广基于证据的治疗方法;(5)改善个体化、分级护理方法和基于证据的治疗方法的长期效果。这一系列论文提供了一个分析框架,为启发式模拟模型提供信息,以便通过实施一套明确的治疗方法和相关政策,以显著提高人口戒烟率,从而采用新的方法来显著提高人口戒烟率,这些方法和政策有可能提高戒烟动机、使用基于证据的治疗方法并提高长期效果。