• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国 2006 年新的针对脑死亡供体肾脏的全国分配方案。

A New UK 2006 National Kidney Allocation Scheme for deceased heart-beating donor kidneys.

机构信息

Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Fox Den Road, Stoke Gifford, Bristol BS34 8RR, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2010 Feb 27;89(4):387-94. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c9029d.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c9029d
PMID:20177339
Abstract

In 2004, it was agreed that a new allocation scheme for kidneys from deceased heart-beating donors was required in the United Kingdom to address observed inequities in access to transplant. The 2006 National Kidney Allocation Scheme (2006 NKAS) was developed to meet agreed objectives and preparatory work included a review of the criteria for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching and simulation evidence about the effectiveness of alternative schemes. ALGORITHM FOR 2006 NKAS: The 2006 NKAS gives absolute priority to all 000 HLA-A, -B, -DR-mismatched patients and well-matched pediatric patients (<18 years), and then a points score defines priorities for allocation with waiting time being most influential. Points for age and HLA mismatch are linked in a novel approach to ensure well-matched transplants for younger patients while recognizing that HLA matching is less important for older patients as retransplantation is less likely to be required. To improve equity for difficult to match patients, rare HLA specificities were defaulted to more common, related specificities. IMPACT OF 2006 NKAS: After 3 years, the scheme is already making good progress in achieving its objectives, with overall results similar to those observed in the simulations. There has been a significant benefit for patients waiting more than 5 years for transplant. A number of other advantages of the scheme are also apparent with equity of access improving in many respects, including the achievement of equity of access to transplant for HLA-DR homozygous patients, but geographical inequity of access will take a number of years to address fully.

摘要

2004 年,英国一致认为需要为已故心跳捐献者的肾脏制定新的分配方案,以解决移植中观察到的机会不平等问题。2006 年国家肾脏分配方案(2006NKAS)的制定是为了实现既定目标,准备工作包括审查人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配标准和替代方案的模拟证据。

2006NKAS 算法:2006NKAS 为所有 000 HLA-A、-B、-DR 错配患者和匹配良好的儿科患者(<18 岁)提供绝对优先权,然后根据分配优先权的积分来定义分配优先级,等待时间的影响最大。年龄和 HLA 错配的积分通过一种新方法联系在一起,以确保为年轻患者提供匹配良好的移植,同时认识到 HLA 匹配对年龄较大的患者不太重要,因为不太可能需要再次移植。为了提高难以匹配患者的公平性,将罕见的 HLA 特异性默认为更常见的相关特异性。

2006NKAS 的影响:3 年后,该方案在实现其目标方面已经取得了良好的进展,总体结果与模拟结果相似。对于等待移植超过 5 年的患者,方案已经产生了显著的益处。该方案的其他一些优势也很明显,包括在许多方面提高了准入公平性,包括实现 HLA-DR 同型患者的移植机会公平性,但要完全解决地理上的准入不公平问题还需要数年时间。

相似文献

1
A New UK 2006 National Kidney Allocation Scheme for deceased heart-beating donor kidneys.英国 2006 年新的针对脑死亡供体肾脏的全国分配方案。
Transplantation. 2010 Feb 27;89(4):387-94. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c9029d.
2
Impact of the 1998 UK National Allocation Scheme for deceased heartbeating donor kidneys.1998 年英国全国已故有心搏供者肾脏分配计划的影响。
Transplantation. 2010 Feb 27;89(4):372-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c90270.
3
Factors influencing outcome after deceased heart beating donor kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom: an evidence base for a new national kidney allocation policy.影响英国脑死亡供体肾移植后结局的因素:新国家肾脏分配政策的证据基础。
Transplantation. 2010 Feb 27;89(4):379-86. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c90287.
4
Outcome and allocation of deceased heart-beating donor kidneys in the United kingdom.英国已故心脏跳动供体肾脏的分配与结果
Transplantation. 2010 Feb 27;89(4):371. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181cb3eac.
5
Allocation of deceased donor kidneys in São Paulo, Brazil: effect of human leukocyte antigen compatibility on graft survival.巴西圣保罗已故供体肾脏的分配:人类白细胞抗原相容性对移植物存活的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):93-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.051.
6
Renal transplantation in the UK and Republic of Ireland.英国和爱尔兰共和国的肾移植
Clin Transpl. 2000:105-13.
7
A new national allocation scheme for adult kidneys in the United Kingdom. United Kingdom Transplant Support Service Authority (UKTSSA) Users' Kidney Advisory Group and its Task Forces.英国一项新的成人肾脏全国分配计划。英国移植支持服务管理局(UKTSSA)用户肾脏咨询小组及其特别工作组。
Clin Transpl. 1998:107-13.
8
The OPTN/UNOS Renal Transplant Registry.器官获取与移植网络/美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处
Clin Transpl. 2005:1-16.
9
An algorithm for cadaver kidney allocation based on a multivariate analysis of factors impacting on cadaver kidney graft survival and function.一种基于对影响尸体肾移植存活和功能的因素进行多变量分析的尸体肾分配算法。
Transpl Int. 2000;13 Suppl 1:S259-62. doi: 10.1007/s001470050337.
10
Development of a central matching system for the allocation of cadaveric kidneys: a simulation of clinical effectiveness versus equity.尸体肾分配中央匹配系统的开发:临床有效性与公平性的模拟
Med Decis Making. 1994 Apr-Jun;14(2):124-36. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400205.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Asian and Black Donor and Recipient Ethnicity on the Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United Kingdom.英国的研究表明,在已故供体肾移植中,供体和受者的亚洲及黑人种族对结果有影响。
Transpl Int. 2024 Apr 22;37:12605. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12605. eCollection 2024.
2
Waiting, strange: transplant recipient experience, medical time and queer/crip temporalities.等待,很奇怪:移植受者的体验、医学时间和酷儿/残障的时间性。
Med Humanit. 2021 Dec;47(4):447-455. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012141. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
Associations with kidney transplant survival and eGFR decline in children and young adults in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study.
英国儿童和青年肾移植存活率和 eGFR 下降的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Nov 18;21(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02156-2.
4
The Toxic Impact of Honey Adulteration: A Review.蜂蜜掺假的毒性影响:综述
Foods. 2020 Oct 26;9(11):1538. doi: 10.3390/foods9111538.
5
UK renal transplant outcomes in low and high BMI recipients: the need for a national policy.英国低 BMI 和高 BMI 受者的肾脏移植结局:国家政策的必要性。
J Nephrol. 2020 Apr;33(2):371-381. doi: 10.1007/s40620-019-00654-7. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Equity-Efficiency Trade-offs Associated With Alternative Approaches to Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: A Patient-level Simulation.与不同的 deceased donor kidney allocation 方法相关的公平-效率权衡:基于患者水平的模拟研究。
Transplantation. 2020 Apr;104(4):795-803. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002910.
7
Barriers to living donor kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom: a national observational study.英国活体供肾移植的障碍:一项全国性观察性研究。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 May 1;32(5):890-900. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx036.
8
Patient preferences, knowledge and beliefs about kidney allocation: qualitative findings from the UK-wide ATTOM programme.患者对肾脏分配的偏好、知识和信念:英国全国性ATTOM项目的定性研究结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 27;7(1):e013896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013896.
9
Should Children Be Given Priority in Kidney Allocation?儿童在肾脏分配中应享有优先权吗?
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Dec;13(4):535-545. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9737-x. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
10
Predicting patient survival after deceased donor kidney transplantation using flexible parametric modelling.使用灵活参数模型预测尸体供肾移植后的患者生存率。
BMC Nephrol. 2016 May 25;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0264-0.