Organ Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Fox Den Road, Stoke Gifford, Bristol BS34 8RR, United Kingdom.
Transplantation. 2010 Feb 27;89(4):387-94. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c9029d.
In 2004, it was agreed that a new allocation scheme for kidneys from deceased heart-beating donors was required in the United Kingdom to address observed inequities in access to transplant. The 2006 National Kidney Allocation Scheme (2006 NKAS) was developed to meet agreed objectives and preparatory work included a review of the criteria for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching and simulation evidence about the effectiveness of alternative schemes. ALGORITHM FOR 2006 NKAS: The 2006 NKAS gives absolute priority to all 000 HLA-A, -B, -DR-mismatched patients and well-matched pediatric patients (<18 years), and then a points score defines priorities for allocation with waiting time being most influential. Points for age and HLA mismatch are linked in a novel approach to ensure well-matched transplants for younger patients while recognizing that HLA matching is less important for older patients as retransplantation is less likely to be required. To improve equity for difficult to match patients, rare HLA specificities were defaulted to more common, related specificities. IMPACT OF 2006 NKAS: After 3 years, the scheme is already making good progress in achieving its objectives, with overall results similar to those observed in the simulations. There has been a significant benefit for patients waiting more than 5 years for transplant. A number of other advantages of the scheme are also apparent with equity of access improving in many respects, including the achievement of equity of access to transplant for HLA-DR homozygous patients, but geographical inequity of access will take a number of years to address fully.
2004 年,英国一致认为需要为已故心跳捐献者的肾脏制定新的分配方案,以解决移植中观察到的机会不平等问题。2006 年国家肾脏分配方案(2006NKAS)的制定是为了实现既定目标,准备工作包括审查人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配标准和替代方案的模拟证据。
2006NKAS 算法:2006NKAS 为所有 000 HLA-A、-B、-DR 错配患者和匹配良好的儿科患者(<18 岁)提供绝对优先权,然后根据分配优先权的积分来定义分配优先级,等待时间的影响最大。年龄和 HLA 错配的积分通过一种新方法联系在一起,以确保为年轻患者提供匹配良好的移植,同时认识到 HLA 匹配对年龄较大的患者不太重要,因为不太可能需要再次移植。为了提高难以匹配患者的公平性,将罕见的 HLA 特异性默认为更常见的相关特异性。
2006NKAS 的影响:3 年后,该方案在实现其目标方面已经取得了良好的进展,总体结果与模拟结果相似。对于等待移植超过 5 年的患者,方案已经产生了显著的益处。该方案的其他一些优势也很明显,包括在许多方面提高了准入公平性,包括实现 HLA-DR 同型患者的移植机会公平性,但要完全解决地理上的准入不公平问题还需要数年时间。