Suppr超能文献

尿动力学检查的陷阱。

Pitfalls of urodynamic testing.

作者信息

O'Donnell P D

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

出版信息

Urol Clin North Am. 1991 May;18(2):257-68.

PMID:2017808
Abstract

Urodynamic studies are one of the most useful clinical techniques available for the evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Urodynamic data are of immense value in the diagnosis and treatment of many disorders of bladder and urethral function. However, there are problems of measurement that can limit the clinical applications of information obtained. First, the urologist should have a special interest in the neurophysiology of lower urinary tract disorders. Second, the standardized ICS concepts and terminology should be used in the descriptions of the findings. Third, the clinical value and limitations of each segment of the studies should be appreciated by the urologist. Fourth, careful attention should be given to the testing methodology and the calibration of the instruments. Finally, an investigative scientific approach should be taken to the interpretation of the data obtained.

摘要

尿动力学检查是评估下尿路功能障碍最有用的临床技术之一。尿动力学数据在膀胱和尿道功能的许多疾病的诊断和治疗中具有巨大价值。然而,存在一些测量问题,可能会限制所获信息的临床应用。首先,泌尿外科医生应特别关注下尿路疾病的神经生理学。其次,在描述检查结果时应使用标准化的国际尿控学会(ICS)概念和术语。第三,泌尿外科医生应了解研究各部分的临床价值和局限性。第四,应仔细注意检测方法和仪器校准。最后,对所获数据的解释应采用科学的研究方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验