Smith A T, Edgar G K
Department of Psychology, University of Wales College of Cardiff, U.K.
Vision Res. 1991;31(2):321-6. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90121-k.
McKee, Silverman and Nakayama (1986; Vision Research, 26, 609-619) have shown that velocity discrimination performance is little affected by quite large random changes in the spatial frequency, and hence temporal frequency, of the grating patterns to be discriminated. We show that the converse is also true: temporal frequency discrimination can be performed despite random changes in velocity. This casts doubt on McKee et al.'s conclusion that velocity is the fundamental dimension of the temporal mechanisms mediating discrimination and that temporal frequency has to be inferred indirectly from velocity and spatial frequency. We suggest instead that both velocity and temporal frequency are represented in the visual system but that the two dimensions are only partially separable at the perceptual level.
麦基、西尔弗曼和中山(1986年;《视觉研究》,第26卷,609 - 619页)已经表明,速度辨别性能受待辨别光栅图案的空间频率以及因此的时间频率相当大的随机变化影响很小。我们表明反之亦然:尽管速度存在随机变化,时间频率辨别仍可进行。这对麦基等人的结论提出了质疑,即速度是介导辨别的时间机制的基本维度,并且时间频率必须从速度和空间频率间接推断出来。相反,我们认为速度和时间频率在视觉系统中都有表征,但这两个维度在感知层面仅部分可分离。