Willems Sylvie, Dedonder Jonathan, Van der Linden Martial
University of Liège, Belgium.
Exp Psychol. 2010;57(3):185-92. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000023.
In line with Whittlesea and Price (2001), we investigated whether the memory effect measured with an implicit memory paradigm (mere exposure effect) and an explicit recognition task depended on perceptual processing strategies, regardless of whether the task required intentional retrieval. We found that manipulation intended to prompt functional implicit-explicit dissociation no longer had a differential effect when we induced similar perceptual strategies in both tasks. Indeed, the results showed that prompting a nonanalytic strategy ensured performance above chance on both tasks. Conversely, inducing an analytic strategy drastically decreased both explicit and implicit performance. Furthermore, we noted that the nonanalytic strategy involved less extensive gaze scanning than the analytic strategy and that memory effects under this processing strategy were largely independent of gaze movement.
与惠特尔西和普赖斯（2001年）的研究一致，我们调查了用内隐记忆范式（单纯曝光效应）和外显识别任务测量的记忆效应是否依赖于知觉加工策略，而不管该任务是否需要有意提取。我们发现，当我们在两个任务中诱导相似的知觉策略时，旨在促使功能性内隐-外显分离的操作不再产生差异效应。事实上，结果表明，促使采用非分析性策略可确保两个任务的表现均高于随机水平。相反，诱导采用分析性策略会大幅降低外显和内隐表现。此外，我们注意到，非分析性策略涉及的注视扫描范围比分析性策略小，并且在这种加工策略下的记忆效应在很大程度上与注视运动无关。
