Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):754-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.181.
Context High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with atherothrombotic events following coronary stent implantation. Objective To evaluate the capability of multiple platelet function tests to predict clinical outcome. Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective, observational, single-center cohort study of 1069 consecutive patients taking clopidogrel undergoing elective coronary stent implantation between December 2005 and December 2007. On-treatment platelet reactivity was measured in parallel by light transmittance aggregometry, Verify Now P2Y12 and Platelet works assays, and the IMPACT-R and the platelet function analysis system (PFA-100) (with the Dade PFA collagen/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) cartridge and Innovance PFA P2Y). Cutoff values for high on-treatment platelet reactivity were established by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Main Outcome Measurement The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point included TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) criteria major and minor bleeding. Results Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that at 1-year follow-up, the primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity when assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (52 [11.7%; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 8.9%-15.0%] vs 36 [6.0%;95%CI, 4.2%-8.2%] P.001; n=1049),Verify Now (54 [13.3%; 95% CI, 10.2%-17.0%] vs 37 [5.7%; 95% CI, 4.1%-7.8%]P.001; n=1052), Platelet works (33 [12.6%; 95% CI, 8.8%-17.2%] vs 21 [6.1%;95% CI, 3.8%-9.2%] P=.005; n=606), and Innovance PFA P2Y (18 [12.2%; 95%CI; 7.4%-18.6%] vs 28 [6.3%; 95% CI, 4.3%-8.9%] P=.02; n=588). ROC-curve analysis demonstrated that light transmittance aggregometry (area under the curve[AUC], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), Verify Now (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.57-0.67), and Platelet works (AUC, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.69) had modest ability to discriminate between patients with and without primary end point at 1-year follow-up. The IMPACT-R(n=905) and the Siemens PFA Collagen/ADP (n=812) were unable to discriminate between patients with and without the primary end point at 1-year follow-up (all AUCs included 0.50 in the CI). None of the tests identified patients at risk for bleeding. Conclusions Of the platelet function tests assessed, light transmittance aggregometry,Verify Now, Platelet works, and Innovance PFA P2Y were significantly associated with the primary end point. However, the predictive accuracy of these 4 tests was only modest. None of the tests provided accurate prognostic information to identify patients at higher risk of bleeding following stent implantation. Trial Registration clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT00352014 [corrected].
治疗中血小板反应性高与冠状动脉支架植入术后动脉血栓事件有关。目的:评估多种血小板功能检测预测临床结果的能力。设计、地点和患者:前瞻性、观察性、单中心队列研究,纳入 1069 例连续服用氯吡格雷行择期冠状动脉支架植入术的患者,研究时间为 2005 年 12 月至 2007 年 12 月。在治疗中通过光透射聚集法、VerifyNow P2Y12 和血小板工作测定、IMPACT-R 和血小板功能分析系统(PFA-100)(使用 Dade PFA 胶原/腺苷二磷酸(ADP)试剂盒和 Innovance PFA P2Y)平行测量血小板反应性。通过接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析确定高治疗中血小板反应性的截断值。主要终点:定义为全因死亡、非致死性急性心肌梗死、支架血栓形成和缺血性卒中的复合终点。主要安全性终点包括 TIMI(血栓形成性心肌梗死)标准主要和次要出血。结果:Kaplan-Meier 分析表明,在 1 年随访时,用光透射聚集法评估时,高治疗中血小板反应性患者的主要终点发生率更高(52 例[11.7%;95%置信区间(CI),8.9%-15.0%]比 36 例[6.0%;95%CI,4.2%-8.2%]P.001;n=1049),VerifyNow(54 例[13.3%;95%CI,10.2%-17.0%]比 37 例[5.7%;95%CI,4.1%-7.8%]P.001;n=1052),血小板工作法(33 例[12.6%;95%CI,8.8%-17.2%]比 21 例[6.1%;95%CI,3.8%-9.2%]P=.005;n=606),和 Innovance PFA P2Y(18 例[12.2%;95%CI,7.4%-18.6%]比 28 例[6.3%;95%CI,4.3%-8.9%]P=.02;n=588)。ROC 曲线分析表明,光透射聚集法(曲线下面积[AUC],0.63;95%CI,0.58-0.68)、VerifyNow(AUC,0.62;95%CI,0.57-0.67)和血小板工作法(AUC,0.61;95%CI,0.53-0.69)在 1 年随访时具有适度区分有和无主要终点的能力。IMPACT-R(n=905)和西门子 PFA 胶原/ADP(n=812)不能在 1 年随访时区分有和无主要终点的患者(所有 AUC 均包含 0.50 的 CI)。这些检测方法均不能识别出血风险高的患者。结论:在所评估的血小板功能检测中,光透射聚集法、VerifyNow、血小板工作法和 Innovance PFA P2Y 与主要终点显著相关。然而,这些 4 种检测方法的预测准确性仅为中等。这些检测方法均未提供准确的预后信息来识别支架植入术后出血风险较高的患者。试验注册:临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT00352014[更正]。