Rutkunas Vygandas, Sabaliauskas Vaidotas
Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius university Zalgirio str. 115, 08217 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Stomatologija. 2009;11(4):102-12.
OBJECTIVES. To investigate repolishing effect of stained provisional prosthetic materials in vitro. METHODS. Thirty two cylindrical specimens (10 x 2 mm) were prepared for each of light-polymerized composites (Revotek LC, Rx-Create), bis-acryl composites (Structur Premium, Protemp Garant3, Luxatemp Fluorescence), methyl-methacrylate (UnifastTRAD) and ethyl-methacrylate (DentalonPlus) based provisional material using a mould. The specimens were divided into 4 groups (n=8) according to different repolishing techniques. The specimens were stored for 24 hours at 37 degrees C in distilled water, and then transferred into 4 different staining agents. The colour was measured with a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade) before exposure and after repolishing procedures, and colour changes (DeltaE) were calculated.
three-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post-hoc test (p<0.05). RESULTS. The influence of type of provisional material, polishing procedure, food colorants and combinations of them on colour change was significant (p<0.05). After the repolishing procedures, all the specimens stored in distilled water achieved an unnoticeable colour change (DeltaE<3.7), except Dentalon Plus, Rx Create, Unifast TRAD. A similar tendency was observed in artificial food colourant solution following subsequent repolishing of the specimens. As for the red wine, all repolished specimens attained unnoticeable colour change (DeltaE<3.7), except Dentalon Plus using Rx polishing paste, Enhance polishing set or repeated glazing procedure. CONCLUSION. Repolishing was found to be an effective way to improve aesthetic appearance for provisional prosthetic materials by partially removing staining observed on the surface of the restorations.
目的。体外研究染色的临时修复材料的再抛光效果。方法。使用模具为光固化复合材料(Revotek LC、Rx-Create)、双丙烯酸复合材料(Structur Premium、Protemp Garant3、Luxatemp Fluorescence)、甲基丙烯酸甲酯(UnifastTRAD)和基于甲基丙烯酸乙酯(DentalonPlus)的临时材料制备32个圆柱形试件(10×2毫米)。根据不同的再抛光技术将试件分为4组(n = 8)。将试件在37℃的蒸馏水中储存24小时,然后转移到4种不同的染色剂中。在暴露前和再抛光程序后用分光光度计(Vita Easyshade)测量颜色,并计算颜色变化(ΔE)。
三因素方差分析,Tukey HSD事后检验(p<0.05)。结果。临时材料类型、抛光程序、食用色素及其组合对颜色变化的影响显著(p<0.05)。再抛光程序后,除了Dentalon Plus、Rx Create、Unifast TRAD外,所有储存在蒸馏水中的试件颜色变化不明显(ΔE<3.7)。在对试件进行后续再抛光后,在人工食用色素溶液中也观察到类似趋势。至于红酒,除了使用Rx抛光膏、Enhance抛光套装或重复上釉程序的Dentalon Plus外,所有再抛光的试件颜色变化不明显(ΔE<3.7)。结论。发现再抛光是一种有效的方法,通过部分去除修复体表面观察到的染色来改善临时修复材料的美学外观。