• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去十年间城市儿科急诊科家长就诊原因的变化。

Change in parental reasons for use of an urban pediatric emergency department in the past decade.

作者信息

Stockwell Melissa S, Findley Sally E, Irigoyen Matilde, Martinez Raquel Andres, Sonnett Meridith

机构信息

Division of General Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):181-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfc7.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfc7
PMID:20179661
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes over the past decade in parental reasons associated with nonurgent visits to pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) during regular primary care office hours.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of cross-sectional surveys of families of children younger than 3 years visiting a PED in a low-socioeconomic area in New York City conducted in 1997 and 2006. We performed multivariable analyses to assess differences in parental reported reasons for PED use over the period, controlling for sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

Most children (95.6%) had a usual source of care across both periods. Compared with those seen in 1997, children seen in 2006 were far less likely to be brought to the PED during regular primary care office hours for parental perceived urgency (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.024-0.24; P < 0.001). At the same time, these children were more likely to be brought to the PED for limited access to their usual source of care (AOR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.24-9.02; P < 0.05) and greater trust in the medical expertise of the PED (AOR, 5.95 95% CI, 1.20-29.45; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last decade, despite the presence of a usual source of care, a greater number of parents report visiting this urban PED during regular office hours for reasons unrelated to parental perceived urgency. Limited access to care and greater trust in the medical expertise available in PEDs have played important roles. Approaches to decreasing nonurgent visits must take into account all of these factors.

摘要

目的

评估过去十年间,在常规初级保健办公时间内,与非紧急情况下带孩子前往儿科急诊科(PED)就诊相关的家长原因的变化。

方法

对1997年和2006年在纽约市一个低社会经济地区前往儿科急诊科就诊的3岁以下儿童家庭进行的横断面调查进行二次分析。我们进行了多变量分析,以评估在此期间家长报告的前往儿科急诊科就诊原因的差异,并控制社会人口学因素。

结果

在这两个时期,大多数儿童(95.6%)都有固定的医疗保健来源。与1997年就诊的儿童相比,2006年就诊的儿童在常规初级保健办公时间因家长认为紧急而被带到儿科急诊科的可能性要小得多(调整后的优势比[AOR]为0.076;95%置信区间[CI]为0.024 - 0.24;P < 0.001)。与此同时,这些儿童因难以联系到其常规医疗保健来源而被带到儿科急诊科的可能性更大(AOR为3.35;95%CI为1.24 - 9.02;P < 0.05),并且对儿科急诊科医疗专业知识的信任度更高(AOR为5.95;95%CI为1.20 - 29.45;P < 0.05)。

结论

在过去十年中,尽管有固定的医疗保健来源,但仍有更多家长报告在常规办公时间前往这家城市儿科急诊科就诊,原因与家长认为的紧急情况无关。获得医疗服务的机会有限以及对儿科急诊科医疗专业知识的信任度更高起到了重要作用。减少非紧急就诊的方法必须考虑到所有这些因素。

相似文献

1
Change in parental reasons for use of an urban pediatric emergency department in the past decade.过去十年间城市儿科急诊科家长就诊原因的变化。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):181-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfc7.
2
Effect of telephone calls from primary care practices on follow-up visits after pediatric emergency department visits: evidence from the Pediatric Emergency Department Links to Primary Care (PEDLPC) randomized controlled trial.基层医疗诊所电话随访对儿科急诊科就诊后复诊的影响:来自儿科急诊科与基层医疗联系(PEDLPC)随机对照试验的证据。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):505-11. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.45.
3
Maternal and child factors affecting high-volume pediatric emergency department use.影响儿科急诊高就诊量的母婴因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 May;22(5):301-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000215138.29039.15.
4
Urban minority children with asthma: substantial morbidity, compromised quality and access to specialists, and the importance of poverty and specialty care.患有哮喘的城市少数民族儿童:发病率高、医疗质量受影响且难以获得专科医疗服务,以及贫困和专科护理的重要性。
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):392-8. doi: 10.1080/02770900802712971.
5
Nonurgent use of hospital emergency departments: urgency from the patient's perspective.医院急诊科的非紧急使用:从患者角度看的紧迫性
J Fam Pract. 1996 May;42(5):491-6.
6
Routine emergency department use for sick care by children in the United States.美国儿童在急诊科进行常规疾病护理的情况。
Pediatrics. 1996 Jul;98(1):28-34.
7
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
8
The increasing use of pediatric emergency facilities in the evening.儿科急诊设施在夜间的使用日益增加。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Mar;23(3):142-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3180328cab.
9
Diverting managed care Medicaid patients from pediatric emergency department use.引导管理式医疗的医疗补助计划患者减少儿科急诊科的使用。
Pediatrics. 1995 Feb;95(2):170-8.
10
Parental reasons for utilization of an urban pediatric emergency department during the 2009 H1N1 influenza epidemic.2009年甲型H1N1流感流行期间城市儿科急诊科的家长就诊原因
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Apr;27(4):261-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182131420.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Determining Parents' Decisions to Bring Their Children to the Pediatric Emergency Department for a Minor Illness.决定父母是否带孩子因小病前往儿科急诊的因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Aug 28;23:4141-4148. doi: 10.12659/msm.902639.
2
Parental decision making associated with pediatric emergency department use for asthma.与小儿急诊科哮喘就诊相关的家长决策
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Nov;117(5):490-494. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Assessing Fever Frequency After Pediatric Live Attenuated Versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccination.
评估儿童接种减毒活疫苗与灭活流感疫苗后的发热频率。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):e7-e14. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piw028.
4
Pediatric Use of Emergency Medical Services: The Role of Chronic Illnesses and Behavioral Health Problems.儿科对紧急医疗服务的使用:慢性病和行为健康问题的作用。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 May-Jun;20(3):362-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1115928.
5
Why Do Parents Bring Their Children to the Emergency Department? A Systematic Inventory of Motives.家长为何带孩子去急诊科?动机的系统梳理
Int J Family Med. 2015;2015:978412. doi: 10.1155/2015/978412. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Understanding Low-Acuity Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department.了解小儿急诊科的低 acuity 就诊情况。 (注:这里的“acuity”常见释义为“敏锐;尖锐;(视力、思维、感官等的)敏锐度” ,结合语境推测这里可能是指病情严重程度较低的就诊情况,但仅从字面准确翻译就是上述译文 )
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0128927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128927. eCollection 2015.
7
Effect of a URI-related educational intervention in early head start on ED visits.与上呼吸道感染相关的早期开端教育干预对急诊就诊的影响。
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):e1233-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2350. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
The burden of inappropriate emergency department pediatric visits: why Italy needs an urgent reform.不适当的儿科急诊就诊负担:意大利为何需要紧急改革。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug;49(4):1290-305. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12161. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
9
Determinants of nonurgent use of the emergency department for pediatric patients in 12 hospitals in Belgium.比利时 12 家医院儿科患者非紧急使用急诊的决定因素。
Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Dec;171(12):1829-37. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1853-y. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
10
How parents' negative experiences at immunization visits affect child immunization status in a community in New York City.父母在免疫接种访视中的负面经历如何影响纽约市一个社区的儿童免疫接种状况。
Public Health Rep. 2011 Jul-Aug;126 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):24-32. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S204.