Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Laboratory of Sport Psychology, Bellaterra, Spain.
Int J Sports Med. 2010 May;31(5):336-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248319. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
The present study was performed to compare R-R interval data and heart rate variability indices obtained from the Polar S810i and the Omega Wave Sport System for a total of 96 adults in a supine position. Data were simultaneously recorded with the Polar S810i and the Omega Wave Sport System and processed by unique software. Bland-Altman analysis for the R-R intervals shows minimal bias for free and paced breathing. No significant differences were observed for heart rate variability indices derived from the signal from both devices, except for the power of the high frequency band and the acceleration changes index during either free or paced breathing. Coefficients of correlations were all above 0.96. These data suggest that both systems are valid to record R-R interval signals and to obtain a valid analysis of heart rate variability. However, Omega Wave Sport System enables data to be collected without any artifacts making the analysis of heart rate variability easier than the analysis of Polar S810i. Nevertheless, Polar S810i continues to be more practical in clinical and applied situations due to the affordability of the device.
本研究旨在比较在 96 名仰卧位成年人中同时使用 Polar S810i 和 Omega Wave Sport 系统获得的 R-R 间期数据和心率变异性指数。使用 Polar S810i 和 Omega Wave Sport 系统同步记录数据,并使用独特的软件进行处理。R-R 间期的 Bland-Altman 分析显示,自由呼吸和起搏呼吸时的偏差最小。除了在自由或起搏呼吸时高频带的功率和加速度变化指数外,两种设备信号衍生的心率变异性指数无显著差异。相关系数均高于 0.96。这些数据表明,两种系统均能有效记录 R-R 间期信号并对心率变异性进行有效分析。然而,Omega Wave Sport 系统能够采集无伪差的数据,使心率变异性分析比 Polar S810i 更容易。然而,由于设备的价格实惠,Polar S810i 在临床和应用环境中仍然更实用。