Poorterman J H G, Dikkes B T, Brand H S
Sectie Sociale Tandheelkunde en Voorlichtingskunde van het Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA).
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2010 Jan;117(1):35-9. doi: 10.5177/ntvt2010.01.09107.
Some dental students in the Netherlands have a job in a dental practice next to their study, as the Individual Health Care Professions Act (introduced in 1997 as Law BIG) allows. The aim of the study was to determine how many dental students of the Academie Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam actually work in a dental practice, which kinds of dental activities they perform and whether these meet the requirements of the Act mentioned before. All dental students (n = 947) received a questionnaire by e-mail. The response was 44% (427 students). Of these students, 71% had a job next to their study; 25% worked in a dental practice. Study progress and age were positively correlated with working in a dental practice. Their activities mainly involved chair assistance, giving brushing instructions and fluoride applications, and dental cleaning. These students asseemed that they were better informed about the Individual Health Care Professions Act than other students. The source of this information was not, however, the practice where they worked. It was evident, moreover, that they felt the need for more information concerning the delegation of restricted dental activities.
荷兰的一些牙科学生在学习之余会根据《个体医疗保健职业法》(1997年作为《BIG法》引入)的规定,在牙科诊所工作。该研究的目的是确定阿姆斯特丹牙科学院的牙科学生中实际在牙科诊所工作的人数、他们从事的牙科活动类型以及这些活动是否符合上述法律的要求。所有牙科学生(n = 947)都通过电子邮件收到了一份问卷。回复率为44%(427名学生)。在这些学生中,71%在学习之余有工作;25%在牙科诊所工作。学习进度和年龄与在牙科诊所工作呈正相关。他们的活动主要包括椅旁协助、提供刷牙指导和涂氟以及牙齿清洁。这些学生似乎比其他学生更了解《个体医疗保健职业法》。然而,他们获取这些信息的来源并非他们工作的诊所。此外,很明显他们觉得需要更多关于受限牙科活动委托的信息。