• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂(PPI)试验对韩国患者胃食管反流病(GERD)检测的诊断价值及与PPI反应性相关的因素。

Diagnostic value of the PPI test for detection of GERD in Korean patients and factors associated with PPI responsiveness.

作者信息

Cho Yu Kyung, Choi Myung-Gyu, Lim Chul Hyun, Nam Kwan Woo, Chang Jae Hyuck, Park Jae Myung, Lee In Seok, Kim Sang Woo, Choi Kyu Yong, Chung In-Sik

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;45(5):533-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521003650172.

DOI:10.3109/00365521003650172
PMID:20180645
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Data supporting the use of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test as a diagnostic test of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Asia are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of the PPI test and factors associated with responsiveness to PPIs.

METHODS

The PPI test was evaluated using lansoprazole (30 mg bid) for two weeks. All patients underwent endoscopy after symptom assessment. Patients without erosive esophagitis (ERD) underwent 48 h esophageal Bravo pH monitoring. Subjects were considered to be responsive to PPIs if they reported a > 50% reduction in reflux symptom score.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (M:F = 40:37, 47 +/- 13 years) were enrolled. We identified 46 patients with ERD, 18 patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and 9 patients without GERD. The PPI response rate was higher in patients with GERD than in patients without GERD (49/64, 77% vs. 4/9, 44%; p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 77%, 56%, 92% and 25%, respectively. The PPI responsiveness was 80% (37/46) in the ERD group and 67% (12/18) in the NERD group. PPI response was not affected by age, sex, Helicobacter pylori, the psychological characteristics or cytochrome P2C genotypes. ERD and symptom-reflux association were the factors affecting PPI responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPI test was modestly sensitive and specific for diagnosing GERD. However, it would be useful for discriminating patients with ERD. In the NERD group, patients with positive symptom-reflux association would be most benefit from PPI treatment.

摘要

目的

在亚洲,缺乏支持将质子泵抑制剂(PPI)试验用作胃食管反流病(GERD)诊断试验的数据。本研究的目的是评估PPI试验的诊断特征以及与PPI反应性相关的因素。

方法

使用兰索拉唑(30mg,每日两次)进行为期两周的PPI试验。所有患者在症状评估后接受内镜检查。无糜烂性食管炎(ERD)的患者接受48小时食管Bravo pH监测。如果患者报告反流症状评分降低>50%,则认为其对PPI有反应。

结果

纳入73例患者(男:女 = 40:37,47±13岁)。我们确定了46例ERD患者、18例非糜烂性反流病(NERD)患者和9例无GERD患者。GERD患者的PPI反应率高于无GERD患者(49/64,77%对4/9,44%;p<0.05)。敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为77%、56%、92%和25%。ERD组的PPI反应性为80%(37/46),NERD组为67%(12/18)。PPI反应不受年龄、性别、幽门螺杆菌、心理特征或细胞色素P2C基因型的影响。ERD和症状-反流关联是影响PPI反应性的因素。

结论

PPI试验在诊断GERD方面具有一定程度的敏感性和特异性。然而,它对于鉴别ERD患者是有用的。在NERD组中,症状-反流关联阳性的患者将最受益于PPI治疗。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic value of the PPI test for detection of GERD in Korean patients and factors associated with PPI responsiveness.质子泵抑制剂(PPI)试验对韩国患者胃食管反流病(GERD)检测的诊断价值及与PPI反应性相关的因素。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;45(5):533-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521003650172.
2
The proton pump inhibitor test and the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.质子泵抑制剂试验与胃食管反流病的诊断。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;4(4):423-7. doi: 10.1586/egh.10.38.
3
Clinically distinct characteristics in patients younger than 40 years old with non-cardiac chest pain.非心因性胸痛的 40 岁以下患者的临床特征明显不同。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;27(9):1484-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07174.x.
4
Demographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics of the heartburn groups classified using the Rome III criteria and factors associated with the responsiveness to proton pump inhibitors in the gastroesophageal reflux disease group.使用罗马III标准分类的烧心组的人口统计学、临床和心理特征以及胃食管反流病组中与质子泵抑制剂反应性相关的因素。
Digestion. 2009;79(3):131-6. doi: 10.1159/000209848. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
5
Limited ability of the proton-pump inhibitor test to identify patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.质子泵抑制剂试验识别胃食管反流病患者的能力有限。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Dec;10(12):1360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.06.030. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
6
Proton pump inhibitor responders who are not confirmed as GERD patients with impedance and pH monitoring: who are they?质子泵抑制剂反应者,经阻抗和 pH 监测未被确认为 GERD 患者:他们是谁?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12221. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
7
Comparison of one-week and two-week empirical trial with a high-dose rabeprazole in non-cardiac chest pain patients.高剂量雷贝拉唑对非心源性胸痛患者进行一周和两周经验性试验的比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1504-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05859.x.
8
Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.食管酸暴露接近胃食管交界处的测量对诊断准确性和事件-症状相关性的影响:使用无线双 pH 监测的前瞻性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec;104(12):2918-25. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.506. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
9
Prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux in patients with functional dyspepsia based on the Rome III criteria.基于罗马 III 标准的功能性消化不良患者病理性食管酸反流的患病率和症状模式。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;105(12):2626-31. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.351. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
10
Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis.非糜烂性反流病患者与反流性食管炎患者之间不同的临床特征。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jun;5(6):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.023. Epub 2007 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Poliprotect vs Omeprazole in the Relief of Heartburn, Epigastric Pain, and Burning in Patients Without Erosive Esophagitis and Gastroduodenal Lesions: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.波利特与奥美拉唑在缓解无糜烂性食管炎和胃十二指肠病变的烧心、上腹痛和烧灼感患者中的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 1;118(11):2014-2024. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002360. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
2
Clinical Implications of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Reflux Symptom Index in Patients With Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.胃食管反流病问卷和反流症状指数在疑似喉咽反流症状患者中的临床意义
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Oct 30;28(4):599-607. doi: 10.5056/jnm21235.
3
A case of laryngopharyngeal reflux-associated chronic cough: Misinterpretation of treatment efficacy causes diagnostic delay.
1例喉咽反流相关慢性咳嗽:对治疗效果的误解导致诊断延误。
J Gen Fam Med. 2020 Jul 18;21(6):258-260. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.348. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
Assessing different diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.评估胃食管反流病的不同诊断测试:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 21;12:1756284819890537. doi: 10.1177/1756284819890537. eCollection 2019.
5
Validation of the Korean Version of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.用于诊断胃食管反流病的《胃食管反流病问卷》韩文版的验证
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):91-99. doi: 10.5056/jnm18133.
6
Pharmacological and Safety Profile of Dexlansoprazole: A New Proton Pump Inhibitor - Implications for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Asia Pacific Region.右兰索拉唑的药理及安全性概况:一种新型质子泵抑制剂——对亚太地区胃食管反流病治疗的启示
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jul 30;22(3):355-66. doi: 10.5056/jnm15150.
7
Recurrence and Its Impact on the Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Follow-up Analysis.胃食管反流病患者的复发情况及其对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性随访分析
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jan 31;22(1):86-93. doi: 10.5056/jnm15124.
8
Factors influencing treatment outcome in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: outcome of a prospective pragmatic trial in Asian patients.影响胃食管反流病患者治疗结局的因素:一项针对亚洲患者的前瞻性实用试验的结果
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 9;14:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-156.
9
Symptom characteristics and psychosomatic profiles in different spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease.不同胃食管反流病谱患者的症状特征和身心状况。
Gut Liver. 2014 Mar;8(2):165-9. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.2.165. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
The value of early wireless esophageal pH monitoring in diagnosing functional heartburn in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.早期无线食管 pH 监测在诊断难治性胃食管反流病功能性烧心中的价值。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Oct;58(10):2933-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2728-4. Epub 2013 Jun 14.